OAK cuts Dominic Rhodes

BigShtank

The heat dun frieded my brain
Joined
Oct 10, 2007
Posts
417
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
RB stable next year: Edge, Hightower, Rhodes.........now that sound pretty decent to me.......you can flip flop Hightower/Rhodes or Rhodes/Hightower............let the back-up battle begin...

If we can sign Rhodes to what Shipp is making or less, it would be a great team of RB's to have. Ship and JJ get cut which is long overdue IMO.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,120
Reaction score
1,908
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
So we dont need a guy who averaged 4 yards a carry behind a worse OL then ours last year. A guy who can be counted on to get us 100 yard games if he had to start. A guy that is better then JJ or Shipp? He can improve on any one of those two guys and if he can be an improvement why dont we need him. He isnt going to cost much.

Oakland's Ol is actually the exact opposite of our OL. Very good in the running game, but not that strong protection the QB.

Oakland finished #6 in total rushing and #11 in rushing average. Pretty solid.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
To get to 450-500 carries by our running backs we're going to need one or two guys other than Edge to get 100-200. Who do we have right now that can do that effectively?
 

HookemCards

Have at you!!!!!
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Posts
1,323
Reaction score
38
Location
Temple, Texas
Bring in Dominic, cut Edge maybe to save cap room to get a Q deal done?

Just a thought. I'd hate to see Edge go though.

Not positive but I think cutting Edge actually eats up caproom. Besides why would we do that, Rhodes has never proven he can be a reliable 25 carries a game, 16 games a year back. I'd be for signing Rhodes and jettisoning Shipp and JJ, I think he is a better back than both of them combined.

nvm: would be savings, but still wouldnt' do it
 
Last edited:

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
dont need him.

We need any RB that has started for a NL team last year. If Dallas can take the BA they just signed Rhodes is a Sunday School Teacher. Cut one of our turkeys. I doubt Rhodes will just fall down if someone looks at him. We probably need a BA RB.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
I brought this up in the draft thread. I figured they would cut someone, honestly I thought it would be Lamont Jordan. I would bring in Rhodes and let him compete. It may slow down the progress of Hightower, but it also makes for a great insurance policy.

RB's do not progress much. After a couple of games they can either run or not. They are ready to run the ball when they arrive or not. Keep Hightower and let one of the other guys go who we know cannot run (Arrington for starters).
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
You know I would be interested in LaMont Jordan if he is released. He may not be a speed back but he would be a great 1yr stop gap until next year's first rounder gets used on a RB.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,132
Posts
5,433,721
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top