xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
He is not even the greatest tennis player of the 21st century.
The king of what? Tennis people are divided between Djokovich, Federer, Nadal and Serena Williams. My picks are Federer and Serena. Novak is undoubtedly the greatest at pouting and making excuses.He easily is. Fed is my favorite but Novak is the king.
It’s difficult to assess how Rod Laver would have fared against the players of today, but I suspect the redheaded Aussie would have done just fine. It’s hard to argue with the “Rockets” record. He was ranked number one in the world for seven straight years (1964 – 1970), and he has more career titles (200) than anyone in the history of the game.
He is the only player to have twice won the Grand Slam, doing it once as an amateur in 1962 and again as a pro in 1969. If Laver was not excluded from the Grand Slam tournaments during a five-year period in the mid-1960s, who knows how many he would have won. During this time period, the pre-open era, the Grand Slam tournaments were for amateurs only. The “open era” in tennis did not begin until 1968, when professionals were finally allowed to compete in the Grand Slam events. Given that Laver was ranked number one in the world during this five-year period, it’s likely he would have won many more Grand Slam titles.
I agree; however, he stated the 21st century. This argument exists in every sport. I believe that Laver was the best in his time, but the sport was limited and new professionally.I always thought Rod Laver was the king. Here's a write up that I find hard to argue with:
The king of what? Tennis people are divided between Djokovich, Federer, Nadal and Serena Williams. My picks are Federer and Serena. Novak is undoubtedly the greatest at pouting and making excuses.
As much as I am a tennis fan, I cannot say anyone is a better athlete than Labron.