OK, who else was laughing during the Super Bowl...

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
The Cardinals have never played in the Super Bowl without DRC at CB. :p
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,063
Reaction score
13,835
Didn't say I'd take him over Peterson I don't think I'd take any CB over Peterson considering he's still got plenty of upside
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Didn't say I'd take him over Peterson I don't think I'd take any CB over Peterson considering he's still got plenty of upside

Seven years in the league, and you still want to talk "upside" ?

DRC is what he is.
 
OP
OP
Jetstream Green

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,477
Reaction score
16,651
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Seven years in the league, and you still want to talk "upside" ?

DRC is what he is.

Finito was talking about Peterson having upside but I think Peterson's upside is already on the mountain top, just play smart and do not have metal lapses and fall off the summit of what he is capable of because he knows what to do. I think the two are close to the same coverage ability excepts DRC suffers from more mental lapses and makes Deon Sanders looked like a tackling machine lol
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
Finito was talking about Peterson having upside but I think Peterson's upside is already on the mountain top, just play smart and do not have metal lapses and fall off the summit of what he is capable of because he knows what to do. I think the two are close to the same coverage ability excepts DRC suffers from more mental lapses and makes Deon Sanders looked like a tackling machine lol

:yeahthat:
 

desertdawg

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Posts
21,831
Reaction score
1
Location
@Desertdawg777
I've always called him Doesn't Really Care in here, the recent retirement junk goes right along with his tackling desire, he doesn't even care if he's back on the Broncos. But he'll make millions (again), even if he doesn't care.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
I've always called him Doesn't Really Care in here, the recent retirement junk goes right along with his tackling desire, he doesn't even care if he's back on the Broncos. But he'll make millions (again), even if he doesn't care.
He'll make millions because he can cover, man to man, any WR in the league and that's what CB's get paid to do. Being a good tackler is a bonus.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
All I know is DRC is more productive than Kolb. If we could undo that trade I'm pretty sure everyone would, like him or not. We lost value and ate money.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,668
Location
CA
PP + DRC= one of the top 3 CB tandems in football. Despite his warts DRC= a far above average CB. That trade was so bad...
 

jw7

Woof!
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Posts
8,194
Reaction score
7
Location
Ahwatukee
I laughed at this vid. Marshawn Lynch asks his coach if it okay to score more points.

NFL.com Linky
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,318
Reaction score
11,395
Who did the Eagles end up taking with that pick anyway? ... and more to the point, who was still on the board that the Cards would have likely taken?

What a disaster of a trade.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
Who did the Eagles end up taking with that pick anyway? ... and more to the point, who was still on the board that the Cards would have likely taken?

What a disaster of a trade.
They took OLB Vinny Curry who I think has eaten himself into a DT. He plays but that's about it. When you consider DRC did nothing for them and Curry isn't much of anything, it wasn't all that great a trade from the Philly standpoint either.

The players taken after that pick and were available aren't any of significance:
Kelechi Osemele: he's a starter for Bmore
LaMichael James- Limited impact
Casey Hayward: had a good rookie year but then nothing. NOt sure if he was injured or not, didn't play much.
Reuben Randle: probably not on the Cards radar with Roberts/Fitz/ and they still had Doucet at that point.

next pick was round 3.

I wouldn't call it a disaster. I'd call it a trade that didn't work out for either team.
 
Last edited:

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,318
Reaction score
11,395
I dont really care how it worked out for the Eagles, but from the Cardinals stand point it was absolutely a disaster. There is no other way to characterize it. Two wasted wasted seasons, a lost pick, a lost asset in DRC, a bunch of salary, a bunch of dead cap on this season.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
I dont really care how it worked out for the Eagles, but from the Cardinals stand point it was absolutely a disaster. There is no other way to characterize it. Two wasted wasted seasons, a lost pick, a lost asset in DRC, a bunch of salary, a bunch of dead cap on this season.
Then why did you start out by asking "who did the Eagles take anyway" ? :shrug:
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
They took OLB Vinny Curry who I think has eaten himself into a DT. He plays but that's about it. When you consider DRC did nothing for them and Curry isn't much of anything, it wasn't all that great a trade from the Philly standpoint either.

The players taken after that pick and were available aren't any of significance:
Kelechi Osemele: he's a starter for Bmore
LaMichael James- Limited impact
Casey Hayward: had a good rookie year but then nothing. NOt sure if he was injured or not, didn't play much.
Reuben Randle: probably not on the Cards radar with Roberts/Fitz/ and they still had Doucet at that point.

next pick was round 3.

I wouldn't call it a disaster. I'd call it a trade that didn't work out for either team.

It was a disaster because the Cards gave up a solid cover guy and then over paid millions for a QB who just wasn't any good. Kolb got worse every game he played and then he'd get hurt. Did it in Philly and then repeated the process in Arizona and Buffalo. A typical desperation disaster.

Just like letting Leonard Davis go and passing on Adrian Peterson to draft Leonard Davis. :p:devil:
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
82,071
Reaction score
41,877
Location
South Scottsdale
All I know is DRC is more productive than Kolb. If we could undo that trade I'm pretty sure everyone would, like him or not. We lost value and ate money.

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk

And a second round pick
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,318
Reaction score
11,395
Then why did you start out by asking "who did the Eagles take anyway" ? :shrug:

Because I was wondering who the Cardinals could have had, thats why I said "and more to the point, who was still on the board that the Cards would have likely taken?"


 

CtCardinals78

ASFN Addict
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Posts
7,256
Reaction score
2
They took OLB Vinny Curry who I think has eaten himself into a DT. He plays but that's about it. When you consider DRC did nothing for them and Curry isn't much of anything, it wasn't all that great a trade from the Philly standpoint either.

The players taken after that pick and were available aren't any of significance:
Kelechi Osemele: he's a starter for Bmore
LaMichael James- Limited impact
Casey Hayward: had a good rookie year but then nothing. NOt sure if he was injured or not, didn't play much.
Reuben Randle: probably not on the Cards radar with Roberts/Fitz/ and they still had Doucet at that point.

next pick was round 3.

I wouldn't call it a disaster. I'd call it a trade that didn't work out for either team.


I was just looking over that draft. There were some real steals to be had in the third round, Russell Wilson, Nick Foles, Kirk Cousins and T.Y. Hilton. Not saying anything about who the Cards should or shouldn't have picked, but those four teams got great values for those picks.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
I was just looking over that draft. There were some real steals to be had in the third round, Russell Wilson, Nick Foles, Kirk Cousins and T.Y. Hilton. Not saying anything about who the Cards should or shouldn't have picked, but those four teams got great values for those picks.

But that happens every single year. Great to very good players taken in later rounds.

Kolb was the best and only option out there so Whiz and RG rolled the dice and they came up craps. If Kolb could have stayed healthy then Whiz would still probably still be our HC. Not saying that's a good or bad thing but Kolb was light years better than Bones, Lindley and the rest of that craptastic group.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
I was just looking over that draft. There were some real steals to be had in the third round, Russell Wilson, Nick Foles, Kirk Cousins and T.Y. Hilton. Not saying anything about who the Cards should or shouldn't have picked, but those four teams got great values for those picks.
Other than Wilson, I think all those guys were there when the Cards picked in round 3 and they went with Jamal Fleming. So, who's to say of they would have pick any of them. I guess they may have looked at QB if they didn't have Kolb, but you never know.

Either way, it turned out to be a nothing trade for both teams and no need re-hash all the could've beens.
 
Top