OL question for K9...

[Jetstream Green]

It seemed against the Seahawks that it was not just the lack of physical talent with Shipley and Watford, but also they where being asked to pull or move to cover blocks which was not realistic to ask of them. You have done some brilliant critiques in the past of the OL from a series and was wondering, if you are able, could review some of the plays from the game, the pass and the run. We have some great posters on here which also include the likes of Mitch and Harry and what I like about this forum is the wealth of football knowledge I can glean from another. Yes, the Seahawks and the Rams have great players up front but does our offensive scheme make those advantages more pronounced when maybe they could be simplified by giving our OL a better chance to perform in my opinion

 

[pmacLean]

.....
,,, snip snip ...
,,,,,,,

Yes, the Seahawks and the Rams have great players up front but does our offensive scheme make those advantages more pronounced when maybe they could be simplified by giving our OL a better chance to perform in my opinion

One of those 'great players' the Seahawks had in on their D-line was playing his first game in approx 3 years... and he still beat the crap out of our sad sacks...(maybe we should go get DWash) ... meaning, our D Line also sucks, because all this would be readily apparent in practice if 1 line was great and the other line sucked... so BOTH our lines suck... end of story