- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,684
- Reaction score
- 39,000
^^ You call him a great player when he played, then why is he not a great player, period?
How long does his career have to be for you to call him a great player?
Great player when he played but he played less than 100 games in his NFL career at a position where great ones play many more games.
I think of Palmer as an injury prone guy, and a very good NFL career with a few great years, he played nearly 100 more games than Luck, more than twice as many.
Objectively Luck had 3 great seasons as an NFL QB, 14, 16 and 18. His rookie year was somewhat remarkable in that he inherited a team that had been terrible(2-14) and took them to an 11-5 record, with an interim coach(Arians) but I wouldn't call it a great year. It was just evidence of what the difference is between no NFL caliber qb and an NFL caliber QB as a rookie, with good coaching and an improved team around him. winning 9 more games was pretty impressive as a rookie.
If you ask me in 14, 16 or 18 was he a great QB the answer would be yes, those years he was. Over the career is he a great NFL QB, I'd have to say no he just didn't play long enough.
I'm amazed more guys don't retire early with all the evidence of long term health problems.