OT: Carson Wentz traded to the Commanders

Ronin

In yo city!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
145,967
Reaction score
67,693
Location
Crowley, TX
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,844
Reaction score
41,759
Location
UK
Nice trade for both teams, but man, the Colts need a QB bad.

I don't really know what they are doing. I thought Wentz had a good year.

He was 27/7 and had the 13th best passer rating in the league. For his 1st year with a new coach, scheme, players that's good. He was 9th in QBR too.

Maybe the rumours about him being a bit of a dick were true?

That's not a lot to trade for a talented 30 year old QB earning 28 mil
 
Last edited:

Ronin

In yo city!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
145,967
Reaction score
67,693
Location
Crowley, TX
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,320
Reaction score
23,957
I don't really know what they are doing. I thought Wentz had a good year.

He was 27/7 and had the 13th best passer rating in the league. For his 1st year with a new coach, scheme, players that's good. He was 9th in QBR too.

Maybe the rumours about him being a bit of a dick were true?

That's not a lot to trade for a talented 30 year old QB earning 28 mil
A lot of Colts fans are saying otherwise. You’re most likely missing some context behind those numbers, cause you don’t give up even the biggest dick in the world if his play is worth it. Especially after trading a 1st rounder for him.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,284
Reaction score
39,917
The claim is the Colts were really disappointed in him because the run game was so good with Taylor that they really didn't have to ask much of Wentz, but when they did, they felt he came up short. Stats look good, he made plays against us when he had to but with that level of a run game I guess they expected more big plays.

Maybe Andrew Luck is coming out of retirement (-:
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,844
Reaction score
41,759
Location
UK
A lot of Colts fans are saying otherwise. You’re most likely missing some context behind those numbers, cause you don’t give up even the biggest dick in the world if his play is worth it. Especially after trading a 1st rounder for him.

His passer rating and QBR suggest the fans are wrong.
 

Cardinal Bob

Glutton for Punishment
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Posts
2,451
Reaction score
279
Location
Garwood, NJ
DVontel is right. The numbers look good, but if you watched the Colts more than just the game against us, you would've seen how Wentz was holding that offense back with bad decisions & bad throws. He's lucky he only had 7 INTs.
 

mjb21aztd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
16,116
Reaction score
8,390
Big nf news week with qbs lets see how much longer till murray magic inks his new deal :) hopin soon

Hope wentz works in washington they beeen lookin for a qb longer thsn cards lol
 

Dan H

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
6,287
Reaction score
5,381
Location
Circle City, IN
A lot of Colts fans are saying otherwise. You’re most likely missing some context behind those numbers, cause you don’t give up even the biggest dick in the world if his play is worth it. Especially after trading a 1st rounder for him.
Captain Checkdown. He didn’t have a ton of weapons but he didn’t take a lot of risks either. And when they needed him to make a play to win games, he couldn’t do it.
 

AZman5103

Hall of Famer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
1,673
Reaction score
1,767
Location
Idaho
I dont think Wentz is much better than Heineke. I would have stayed with him over this trade.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,297
Reaction score
35,913
Location
BirdGangThing
DVontel is right. The numbers look good, but if you watched the Colts more than just the game against us, you would've seen how Wentz was holding that offense back with bad decisions & bad throws. He's lucky he only had 7 INTs.
True...I think the Colts wanted him taking more chances, like BA did with Palmer, and not worry so much about INTs.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,500
Reaction score
34,510
Location
Charlotte, NC
I don't really know what they are doing. I thought Wentz had a good year.

He was 27/7 and had the 13th best passer rating in the league. For his 1st year with a new coach, scheme, players that's good. He was 9th in QBR too.

Maybe the rumours about him being a bit of a dick were true?

That's not a lot to trade for a talented 30 year old QB earning 28 mil
I think others have hit the nail on the head. With the offense he had around him, his play was a bit underwhelming.

But again though...his contract isn't terrible. He's basically playing for a reasonable number and I don't quite think that the compensation puts the Colts in position to replace him.

It's kind of like the people calling for the firing of Kingsbury: the alternative might be significantly worse than Kingsbury. You don't move away from a guy coaching or playing winning football when you don't have a better replacement.
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,844
Reaction score
41,759
Location
UK
I’m positive they watched way more Carson Wentz than you did this past season. Think it’s wise to trust them more than your numbers without context.

Numbers don't lie. QBR and passer rating systems have been used for years and are considered generally accurate measurements of performance.

He threw 27 TDs on a team with a strong running game. That was 10th in the league.

I'm not saying he's elite but he's clearly capable. I'd take him over Jimmy G or any of the FA QBs and for two 3rds that's decent value.
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,809
Reaction score
9,631
Location
milan-italy
Numbers don't lie. QBR and passer rating systems have been used for years and are considered generally accurate measurements of performance.

He threw 27 TDs on a team with a strong running game. That was 10th in the league.

I'm not saying he's elite but he's clearly capable. I'd take him over Jimmy G or any of the FA QBs and for two 3rds that's decent value.
So u must love Cousins a lot
Frankly i don't get your point defending him, colts fans were disappointed about his decisions when it matters most
They watched every single snaps so i would trust them on being so critical
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,844
Reaction score
41,759
Location
UK
I think others have hit the nail on the head. With the offense he had around him, his play was a bit underwhelming.

But again though...his contract isn't terrible. He's basically playing for a reasonable number and I don't quite think that the compensation puts the Colts in position to replace him.

It's kind of like the people calling for the firing of Kingsbury: the alternative might be significantly worse than Kingsbury. You don't move away from a guy coaching or playing winning football when you don't have a better replacement.

What weapons? Pittman had over 1000 yards and the next best received was Zach Pascal on 380.

No other WR started more than 9 games and they ran through their whole depth chart.
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,844
Reaction score
41,759
Location
UK
So u must love Cousins a lot
Frankly i don't get your point defending him, colts fans were disappointed about his decisions when it matters most

Well. If Cousins was traded for two 3rds I'd say that was good value too.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,320
Reaction score
23,957
Numbers don't lie. QBR and passer rating systems have been used for years and are considered generally accurate measurements of performance.

He threw 27 TDs on a team with a strong running game. That was 10th in the league.

I'm not saying he's elite but he's clearly capable. I'd take him over Jimmy G or any of the FA QBs and for two 3rds that's decent value.
So why did the Colts’ FO decided to get rid of him after one year after spending a *first* for him, Brit?

Why are Colts’ fans happy? Is it because they watched way more of his snaps compared to you & realize those numbers are misguiding? Could that be it?

Why are a majority of Washington fans not happy?
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,844
Reaction score
41,759
Location
UK
So why did the Colts’ FO decided to get rid of him after one year after spending a *first* for him, Brit?

Why are Colts’ fans happy? Is it because they watched way more of his snaps compared to you & realize those numbers are misguiding? Could that be it?

Why are a majority of Washington fans not happy?

Maybe he's a dick? Lots of rumours around that he rubs team mates the wrong way.

But he's obviously better than two 3rd round picks. That's all I'm saying.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,697
Reaction score
30,542
Location
Gilbert, AZ
He’s not very coachable, is what I’ve heard. Injury case and makes mistakes at the worst times plus high salary is why he got moved. Literally both Coach and GM couldn’t say nice things about him at the Combine.
 
OP
OP
BritCard

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,844
Reaction score
41,759
Location
UK
He’s not very coachable, is what I’ve heard. Injury case and makes mistakes at the worst times plus high salary is why he got moved. Literally both Coach and GM couldn’t say nice things about him at the Combine.

Yeah I think it's a personality thing rather than a talent thing. He was considered an MVP level player just a few years ago. He didn't forget how to play football.

I think it's a smart move by Washington. There is plenty of upside in it for two 3rd round picks. If anyone is used to dealing with a difficult personality it's Ron Rivera.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,537
Posts
5,436,588
Members
6,330
Latest member
Trainwreck20
Top