OT: labor talks

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
82,069
Reaction score
41,875
Location
South Scottsdale
Yeah - I think a floor is useful and as mentioned I think it should tie into revenue sharing as well

Teams shouldn't be able to survive on a combination of league revenue and low payroll

The lack of floor, long path to the highest tier and service time manipulation take the NFL thought of competing with rookie deals and putting it on hyper speed.

I haven't heard players fighting a floor though??
If you have a floor it has to be balanced with a ceiling.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,920
Reaction score
6,830
Location
Goodyear
Balance for whom?

How is balance provided?

What is the benefit?

Honestly not trying to be obtuse, just really don't understand.

If it's competitive balance, MLB is already at par with the other leagues - how does a cap and a floor change that?

What would be the intended impact?
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
82,069
Reaction score
41,875
Location
South Scottsdale
Balance for whom?

How is balance provided?

What is the benefit?

Honestly not trying to be obtuse, just really don't understand.

If it's competitive balance, MLB is already at par with the other leagues - how does a cap and a floor change that?

What would be the intended impact?
You are missing the part of the conversation about the fact that teams have 1/6 of the payroll of the top teams.

The spread is part of the problem. Teams should have to spend a certain amount. And teams shouldn't be able to spend unlimited.

You don't think it's an issue. Many do.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,920
Reaction score
6,830
Location
Goodyear
Teams are limited currently though the luxury tax though.

They bargained this to start at $210M. I find less of a problem with teams spending 2x of the league average then those spending 1/5

For limits, why specifically a hard cap?
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
82,069
Reaction score
41,875
Location
South Scottsdale
Teams are limited currently though the luxury tax though.

They bargained this to start at $210M. I find less of a problem with teams spending 2x of the league average then those spending 1/5

For limits, why specifically a hard cap?
But they aren't limited - teams go over the luxury cap.

Without a hard cap, there are too many loopholes.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,920
Reaction score
6,830
Location
Goodyear
What loopholes?

Very few teams will pay the tax. Most won't do it in consecutive years.

The dodgers will pay for last year and maybe SD. Other contending teams didn't make moves to stay below the threshold

The dodgers will pay more in tax than the lowest 3 teams spent in total payroll.

The proposal by the league is a $180M initial tax threshold with $100M floor.

I think that isn't terrible.

Looking back the last 5 years there is typically 4 teams spending above $180M and 15 spending under $100M
 

unseenaz

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Posts
6,833
Reaction score
5,650
Location
Gilbert
imagine being gerrit cole, calling in support of the 'integrity of the game'

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

loser
 
OP
OP
Ronin

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,715
Reaction score
66,334
Location
Crowley, TX
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

DWKB

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
18,224
Reaction score
7,491
Location
Annapolis, MD
Putting a hard cap on team payroll will only put more money in the owners pockets vs the players pockets.

That’s it. That’s all it will do.
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
82,069
Reaction score
41,875
Location
South Scottsdale
Putting a hard cap on team payroll will only put more money in the owners pockets vs the players pockets.

That’s it. That’s all it will do.
Not if it is percentage of overall revenue
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
82,069
Reaction score
41,875
Location
South Scottsdale
Whose revenue? Baseball is a local game. The Dodgers make a ton more money than the DBacks.
And that is one of the issues. One of the reasons the NFL is so successful and profitable is that the revenue is shared.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,920
Reaction score
6,830
Location
Goodyear
MLB has revenue sharing.

It's allowing teams to backstop these long term, low revenue rebuilds while sucking money away from teams that may be more inclined to spend it
 
OP
OP
Ronin

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,715
Reaction score
66,334
Location
Crowley, TX
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 
OP
OP
Ronin

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,715
Reaction score
66,334
Location
Crowley, TX
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 
OP
OP
Ronin

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,715
Reaction score
66,334
Location
Crowley, TX
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 
Top