The bolded is a gross ivergeberalization based on your tv viewing habits.
That’s what humans do for safety and comfort and ease. The more we want to make our lives easy the more we are willing to give up privacies. It’s part of the evolution of society. The more we want life easy and cushy the more we are willing to give up to attain same. Same with safety. You have to be willing to give up some privacies in order for the NSA to identify bad actors before an event.
I’m curious what your annual tinfoil spend is?
You know you can choose off the grid if it bothers you so much. Find a remote location with few municipal codes. Don’t use a smart phone or computer. Buy a used car from the 70s or 80s and learn how to keep it up yourself. Don’t use streaming or cable subscription services. Keep away from urban areas. It’s possible to live like it’s the 80s, it’s just not as comfortable, enjoyable or safe.
I’m curious what your annual tinfoil spend is?
Find an episode and link if possible. I’d like to view it. What your describing sounds like you might be over generalizing.... What your saying would be a clear violation of rights if being questioned relating to a crime. Being on camera both tv and body I’m assuming would EASILY be dismissed and thrown out if a suspect spoke or offered any relevant info in said circumstance? Thus protecting the guys rights in the end result.
We're already beyond "1984"
Well, Ouchie, I can't pronounce that word, much less know what it means, but, I probably agree with you.
They are required whether you are under arrest or not. If being asked about a crime with which the police think you may be a suspect. And yes felony or misdemeanor has no bearing same same...Well, Ouchie, I can't pronounce that word, much less know what it means, but, I probably agree with you.
I think self incrimination has to do with what you say, not necessarily what you do or have.
I doubt a crime being a felony vs a misdemeanor probably has no bearing on your rights. But, I am not an attorney. Rights are required under a custodial arrest, I think, but like I said, I'm not an attorney
That’s the greatest “autocorrect” ever. Wtf?!?Well, Ouchie, I can't pronounce that word, much less know what it means, but, I probably agree with you.
I think self incrimination has to do with what you say, not necessarily what you do or have.
I doubt a crime being a felony vs a misdemeanor probably has no bearing on your rights. But, I am not an attorney. Rights are required under a custodial arrest, I think, but like I said, I'm not an attorney
I don’t know what ivergeberalization is either, but from the sound of it I bet a 90’s Richard Gere rumor is involved.Well, Ouchie, I can't pronounce that word, much less know what it means, but, I probably agree with you.
I think self incrimination has to do with what you say, not necessarily what you do or have.
I doubt a crime being a felony vs a misdemeanor probably has no bearing on your rights. But, I am not an attorney. Rights are required under a custodial arrest, I think, but like I said, I'm not an attorney
I had to steal it. LOL
If ever there was a sign that we need not yet be concerned with Skynet taking over, look no further than “ivergeberalization.”
Administering ivermectin via gerbil, Richard Gere-style?
To read that people nearby were trying to pull her from the vehicle before the fire took over is truly heartbreaking.Cops Say Raiders’ Henry Ruggs Screamed at Them After Deadly Drunken Crash
Cops Say Raiders’ Henry Ruggs Screamed at Them After Deadly Drunken Crash
Steve Marcus/GettyLas Vegas Raiders wide receiver Henry Ruggs III was incoherent and combative after the high-speed DUI crash that killed a young woman—trying to pull out his IVs at the hospital and screaming at cops, according to a police report.“Get me the **** out of here,” Ruggs, 22, yelled...www.yahoo.com
Heartbreaking accounts from the Good Samaritans that tried to save Tina's life.
Also kind of shocking (to me) that the bail was set at $150k when prosecutors wanted $1 million.
