and risk the coach's wrath?
Would you at this point?
Great read, thanks. I really think Leinart's days in this league are numbered. He may latch on somewhere as a backup, but I don't think he will ever be a legitimate starter in the NFL. Just like every other job in the world your reputation follows you. I think he has a pretty bad rep in the league and he will have to work damn hard to erase that.Sando also has an article up criticising Leinart's attitude thought it's mucher "nicer".
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/22747/thoughts-on-matt-leinarts-arizona-demise
Everyone trashes Cole whenever he writes something, so why take this one seriously. He could be completely correct lets just be consistent.
Cole quotes two unidentified Cardinal players and an unidentified NE coach as making critical comments about Leinart.
All three comments may provide colorful insight as to what the deal may have been with Leinart. But none of these comments can be believed on face-value because the sources go unnamed.
For media people to kick Leinart when he's down is a pretty easy thing to do (i.e. "The new guy, he good/the old guy he bad").
Obviously, there has to be an underlying story about Leinart's rise and ultimate demise as a Cardinal (not that, from a media standpoint, it's any less of a cliche than "rags to riches"; in this case "it's dude has it too easy and falls prey to fame & fortune").
I'd love to know what the whole story turns out to be - but with credible writing from credible writers based on identified sources.
(Hey unidentified Cardinal players and NE coaches - man-up and identify yourselves if you have anything negative to say about Leinart).
Last word, though, is "Leinart gone. Anderson here. Hall here. Onward. Season starts next Sunday."
Cole quotes two unidentified Cardinal players and an unidentified NE coach as making critical comments about Leinart.
All three comments may provide colorful insight as to what the deal may have been with Leinart. But none of these comments can be believed on face-value because the sources go unnamed.
For media people to kick Leinart when he's down is a pretty easy thing to do (i.e. "The new guy, he good/the old guy he bad").
Obviously, there has to be an underlying story about Leinart's rise and ultimate demise as a Cardinal (not that, from a media standpoint, it's any less of a cliche than "rags to riches"; in this case "it's dude has it too easy and falls prey to fame & fortune").
I'd love to know what the whole story turns out to be - but with credible writing from credible writers based on identified sources.
(Hey unidentified Cardinal players and NE coaches - man-up and identify yourselves if you have anything negative to say about Leinart).
Last word, though, is "Leinart gone. Anderson here. Hall here. Onward. Season starts next Sunday."