Our new QB ...

[red desert]

let's trade for him. Up to a #2 pick. Think of it as us trading a buster davis or JJ Arringtonn for a SOLID QB. Myself, I'd go after Leftwich to get us through this season. Warner is fragile. So, too, is Leinart. He really is folks.

J.P. Losman?

Hell, even Shane Boyd would have done us good today.

 

[sportznutt]

Warner is fragile, so you want Leftwich?

I would love Leftwich, but to call him NOT fragile is inaccurate. THe guy's ankle can break on any play.

 

[Zeno]

Warner is fragile, so you want Leftwich?

I would love Leftwich, but to call him NOT fragile is inaccurate. THe guy's ankle can break on any play.

Yeah thast kinda silly. Leftwich just isn't very durable either.

 

[red desert]

Yeah thast kinda silly. Leftwich just isn't very durable either.

Silly? Silly is our qb situation at the moment. Wouldn't you agree?

 

[Zeno]

Silly? Silly is our qb situation at the moment. Wouldn't you agree?

Yep but suggesting trading for Leftwich is even more silly.

 

[red desert]

Yep but suggesting trading for Leftwich is even more silly.

Well then, that's pretty darn silly. I don't know that my post was that silly. Better question: who is going to be our qb the rest of the season? Urban?

Seriously, would you rather have Rattay, Urban, Warner in a sling, or Leftwich?

 

[Big Red D]

so who could we trade for?

 

[Big Red D]

speaking about warner, if he doesn't miss practice time and next week, i will be p-o'd. i thought he should have manned up and gone back in.

 

[Zeno]

Well then, that's pretty darn silly. I don't know that my post was that silly. Better question: who is going to be our qb the rest of the season? Urban?

Seriously, would you rather have Rattay, Urban, Warner in a sling, or Leftwich?

Ok, you are missing the point trading for a fragile Leftwich makes ZERO sense considering we have 2 fragile QBs already on the roster. Chances are trading for him would mean we 'd have 3 injured QBs before too long, thus that makes trading for Leftwich(in particular) not just silly but stupid.

 

[CtCardinals78]

speaking about warner, if he doesn't miss practice time and next week, i will be p-o'd. i thought he should have manned up and gone back in.

dude did you see his elbow on that play that was disgusting.

What drives me nuts is him fumbling the ball. I am getting sick of it.

 

[Big Red D]

dude did you see his elbow on that play that was disgusting.

What drives me nuts is him fumbling the ball. I am getting sick of it.

i did. it was ugly. but i said "if" he doesn't miss time. if he does than, yeah i understand.

 

[red desert]

Ok, you are missing the point trading for a fragile Leftwich makes ZERO sense considering we have 2 fragile QBs already on the roster. Chances are trading for him would mean we 'd have 3 injured QBs before too long, thus that makes trading for Leftwich(in particular) not just silly but stupid.

I guess I am missing the point, because your post makes no sense to me.

 

[Zeno]

I guess I am missing the point, because your post makes no sense to me.

OK simplest terms..Warner = Fragile Leinart = Fragile Leftwich = Fragile having all 3 on your team at the same time = stupid

 

[red desert]

OK simplest terms..Warner = Fragile Leinart = Fragile Leftwich = Fragile having all 3 on your team at the same time = stupid

Actually, the stupid one is you. I'm messing with you. Calm down.

 

[Zeno]

Actually, the stupid one is you. I'm messing with you. Calm down.

Whatever, the bottom line is the team can't have 3 QBs on the roster that have a history of getting hurt. At that point we'd be paying for 5 or 6 QBs (not to mention trading away a pick).

 

[red desert]

Whatever, the bottom line is the team can't have 3 QBs on the roster that have a history of getting hurt. At that point we'd be paying for 5 or 6 QBs (not to mention trading away a pick).

Oh, now I get it. Having three qbs with an injury history is bad. So let's gp with two qbs that have an injury history. Good man.

 

[Lefty]

Trade the a #2 to Cleveland for Derek Anderson. The Browns future is Quinn anyway.

 

[Second Deck]

so who could we trade for?

Plummer!

 

[NMCard]

Tampa was looking for a RB. Send Shipp out there for one of their QBs. Don't the have a few on the roster?

 

[red desert]

Trade the a #2 to Cleveland for Derek Anderson. The Browns future is Quinn anyway.

Now you're talking.

 

[red desert]

Tampa was looking for a RB. Send Shipp out there for one of their QBs. Don't the have a few on the roster?

And you, too. Is that you, Mark?

 

[Big Red D]

Trade the a #2 to Cleveland for Derek Anderson. The Browns future is Quinn anyway.

i don't think the browns are that desperate.

 

[Zeno]

Oh, now I get it. Having three qbs with an injury history is bad. So let's gp with two qbs that have an injury history. Good man.

What are you talking about? Now I'm confused, we already have 2 QBs who are fragile and you want to add another? Why not add a QB who doesn't have that history? Thats my whole point--adding Leftwich just for the sake of adding Leftwich(and he isn't available anyway) would be wrong because he is just as fragile as who we already have. I'd rather have McCown back or talk Plummer out of retirement or someone else with a history of staying healthy and with some playing experience. Leftwich would be a mistake.

We only have 2 Qbs right now...Rattay isn't injured, Warner is, we'll likely sign Hasselback this week...I'll take my chances with them staying healthy than give up a pick for a QB who hasn't proven he can stay healthy.

Heck we might as well talk about trading for Pennington as well as Leftwich, we can have the all Waterford crystal QB depth chart.

 

[Big Red D]

what about seneca wallace?

 

[Zeno]

what about seneca wallace?

I doubt Seattle would trade him within the division.