They've added a lot of good football players to a team that had talent to begin with. They just might be the best team in the NFC West.
I'm putting us at 34th until we actually do something. Right behind the Clippers and Corona del Sol Aztecs.
I'm personally predicting 5-11 again, so until the Cards actually do something on the field, this is exactly what they deserve on paper....
Jeez! Is this deja vu, or something? This is the SAME argument we have on the board EVERY year about this time....
aztecs use the juice. at least they did in 1985 when i was at john coopers' sun angle camp with them and they all had these massive heads, blown up bodies, and no brains.
30th is harsh, but where have we finished the last 10 seasons?
I don't care for the guy, and I have a special hatred for Sports Illustrated for reasons I'm not even going to start to explain here.
That said, until our team manages to finish a season with a winning record, I wouldn't object to every one of these pundits anchoring our team with the rank of 32, all year, every year. Just give us a permanent spot at 32 until we earn our way out of it. What would be the difference? I can't generate any anger anymore for anyone that doesn't believe. No matter who we hire, what we spend, who we bring in, its going to take proof before belief at this point. Don't sing it Chico, Bring it! My motto for these Cardinals from now on, until we see some consistent winning.
Bump for: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/peter_king/08/28/1to100/index.html?bcnn=yes
124. Jon Kitna QB, Lions
135. Anquan Boldin WR, Cardinals
Enough said.
This is a feakin' joke...Bump for: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/peter_king/08/28/1to100/index.html?bcnn=yes
124. Jon Kitna QB, Lions
135. Anquan Boldin WR, Cardinals
Enough said.
Yeah, I was listening to Dale Hellestrae on the way home from work and he was beside himself about this. He said Boldin should at least be in the top 30.
In all honesty, that's easy to say until you actually start getting into the brass tacks of the thing. We can quibble about whether Anquan's a Top 10 or Top 5 wideout. But there are 22 positions on a football field--they're not all equally important. But surely an elite DE, elite CB, elite QB, and elite RB are all more valuable to a franchise than an elite WR. You could probably throw an elite OT in there as well. Those are 5 positions where the top 5 players are probably more valueable than even the best WR: 25 positions.
Then you have to ask yourself if Anquan's really better than Steve Smith, Torry Holt, and Marvin Harrison. I think even among Cardinal fans, the answer would be no. That's another 3 positions.
Don't forget places where the position isn't necessarily marquee, but where the players are. Can anyone really say that Anquan is more valueable to the "success" of a 5-10 team than Brian Urlacher is to a Super Bowl team? Than Bob Sanders was to a team whose defense improbably managed a quantum leap on his return? Than Casey Hampton is to making the Pittsburgh defense go? Say another 5 positions around the league.
And then there are the guys who are in gentle decline but are among the best in history at their positions. Like Ray Lewis and Larry Allen and Steve Hutchinson. Maybe another 4 spots.
Suddenly, you're in the mid-30s before Q even comes into the equation.
I put together a ranking of the top 25 players (maybe it was 50, I don't remember) around the NFL. I legitimately could not find a place for Anquan or Larry Fitzgerald on the list. You say that you don't watch or follow the NFL outside of the Cardinals. There are a ton of good players in the NFL.
Personally, I feel that Anquan probably deserves to be in the Top 100, but making lists like this is a herculean task that is ultimately pointless. Who's better: Julius Peppers, Shaun Alexander, or Champ Bailey? That's a question that's impossible to answer.
I think that Anquan needs to score more touchdowns if he wants more respect around the league.
In all honesty, that's easy to say until you actually start getting into the brass tacks of the thing. We can quibble about whether Anquan's a Top 10 or Top 5 wideout. But there are 22 positions on a football field--they're not all equally important. But surely an elite DE, elite CB, elite QB, and elite RB are all more valuable to a franchise than an elite WR. You could probably throw an elite OT in there as well. Those are 5 positions where the top 5 players are probably more valueable than even the best WR: 25 positions.
Then you have to ask yourself if Anquan's really better than Steve Smith, Torry Holt, and Marvin Harrison. I think even among Cardinal fans, the answer would be no. That's another 3 positions.
Don't forget places where the position isn't necessarily marquee, but where the players are. Can anyone really say that Anquan is more valueable to the "success" of a 5-10 team than Brian Urlacher is to a Super Bowl team? Than Bob Sanders was to a team whose defense improbably managed a quantum leap on his return? Than Casey Hampton is to making the Pittsburgh defense go? Say another 5 positions around the league.
And then there are the guys who are in gentle decline but are among the best in history at their positions. Like Ray Lewis and Larry Allen and Steve Hutchinson. Maybe another 4 spots.
Suddenly, you're in the mid-30s before Q even comes into the equation.
I put together a ranking of the top 25 players (maybe it was 50, I don't remember) around the NFL. I legitimately could not find a place for Anquan or Larry Fitzgerald on the list. You say that you don't watch or follow the NFL outside of the Cardinals. There are a ton of good players in the NFL.
Personally, I feel that Anquan probably deserves to be in the Top 100, but making lists like this is a herculean task that is ultimately pointless. Who's better: Julius Peppers, Shaun Alexander, or Champ Bailey? That's a question that's impossible to answer.
I think that Anquan needs to score more touchdowns if he wants more respect around the league.
The problem I have with it is that Fitz and Boldin are largely regarded as 1a and 1b on this squad...is there really a 75 player difference between the two? I don't think so.In all honesty, that's easy to say until you actually start getting into the brass tacks of the thing. We can quibble about whether Anquan's a Top 10 or Top 5 wideout. But there are 22 positions on a football field--they're not all equally important. But surely an elite DE, elite CB, elite QB, and elite RB are all more valuable to a franchise than an elite WR.
All that is fine and dandy until you see that Calvin Johnson is listed at #63
All that is fine and dandy until you see that Calvin Johnson is listed at #63
are all more valuable to a franchise than an elite WR.
Here's some support for your argument.
The Cars have had numerous elite WRs and they've never won anything since they lost their elite Head Coach.
In fact WR is about the only position where the Cars have been consistently successful over the years.
Sonny Randle to Bobby Joe Conrad to John Gilliam to Mel Gray to Pat Tilley to Roy Green, to Rob Moore to David Boston to Boldin and Fitz.
Plus the Cars traded away Ahmad Rashad.
PS: It's 7-9 now not 5-11.
He'll always be Bobby Moore to me.
Who the hell are these Carinals I keep hearing about?ftfy
Bobby Joe Conrad btw is the reason I'm a Carinal fan. My favorite player when I was a kid.
Wtf is that about? Nary a snap. Let's revisit when he doesn't put up rookie records.
Who the hell are these Carinals I keep hearing about?