Hold on a second now- nobody has called him the worst point guard in the league. Let's not make things up as we go. Sci-Fi may be on the level of Andrew and TheRealHardaway, but he does have a valid point (exaggerated as it may be) in that Bledsoe is really not a good point guard when it comes to actually running a team. He makes poor decisions, takes bad shots/ forces shots instead of passing.
To me, best-case scenario or ceiling, if you will, for Bledsoe is Stephon Marbury. May be a 20 and 8 player one day, but very inefficient, turnover-prone, makes bad decisions and forces things way too much.
You guys make him out to be the second coming of LeBron, and God help anyone who dares criticize him.
Thing with Bledsoe is just consistency and desire. He's shown that he has the ability to dominate a game in all phases and he's also shown that he can often look disinterested and out of synch completely.
That's ok for a young player like Goodwin or Len because their developing guys on cheap rookie contracts. Its not OK for a freaking 25 year old Bledsoe.
James Harden and Blake Griffin are the same age as Bledsoe even though it doesn't feel that way.
Bledsoe needs to stop fooling around and needs to quit turning the ball over and just become more consistent, that's it. He's a terrible 3pt shooter and that doesn't look it will change so I'd suggest less 3s also. He's shooting under 30% from 3 and still taking 3 threes per game.
Bledsoe averaging 16 pts, 5 rebounds, 5 assists and 3 turnovers on
43% shooting including
29% from 3pt land.
I don't think even the biggest Bledsoe fanboys can defend those stats.
Its funny cause Dragic is having a "bad year" and yet he's still shooting 50% from the field and 36% fom 3. All while averaging more points also. Not to mention he doesn't have any chronic knee injuries either.
And yet people wonder why some fans prefer Dragic over Bledsoe if one had to be chosen from the two.