Props for The Cardinals' Offensive Line

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
The more I watch the Cardinals' offensive line in game tapes of the second half of the season, the more impressed I am. First of all, as I have stated in previous posts, there seems to be no question that the line was much more consistent in pass protection when John Skelton was the QB---because Skelton defined the pocket for them, and especially for LT Levi Brown, who repeatedly rode his man wide of Skelton. The interior of LG Daryn Colledge, C Lyle Sendelin and RG Rex Hadnot was very solid in pass pro. And, when Jeremy Bridges played RT, the Cardinals had their best pass protection. Bridges may not be flashy or technically perfect, but he gets the job done.

Over the past two seasons, one of the major improvements the team has shown is in opening holes in the running game, particularly to the left side of the line where Levi Brown is a consummate mauler.

Adding a very good blocking FB in Anthony Sherman last year made the running game even more productive---despite the fact that Beanie Wells was banged up and that having lost Ryan Williams to injury, the Cardinals did not have a viable #2 RB option. When LaRod Stephens-Howling was used in spot duty, he was effective and showed some good bounce to the outside. Alfonso Smith ran well in his limited chances---as he hit the holes hard, albeit perhaps a little too hard at times in that it caused him to lose his legs a little.

Say what you will but get this: now with the addition of RG Adam Snyder, and if for now you count Jeremy Bridges as the RT, all five of the offensive linemen have multiple playoff game experience as starters and three of them (Brown, Sendlein and Colledge) have started in Super Bowls---Snyder has last year's NFC Championship under his belt as a starter---and Bridges has started 3 playoff games, one with Carolina ands two with Arizona in 2009---in fact, Bridges made one of the key plays in the Cardinals extraordinary 51-45 OT win over the Packers, when he recovered a Kurt Warner fumble induced by Clay Matthews---on the first play of what was a key TD drive.

Watching Bridges' play down the stretch last year---the guy was very very solid all the way around. And one thing I really like about him is that even when he wasn't starting he was always on his feet yucking it up with his teammates on the sidelines---keeping the starters fired up---and keeping his head in the game.

Bridges has gotten the tag of versatile backup---and that he certainly is---but could this year be his time to shun that tag? He has 55 career starts and has started 4 or more games for the Cardinals each of the last three years---he even played perhaps his best game filling in at LT in 2009 when the Cardinals beat Brett Favre and the Vikings---and Bridges worked his tail off in trying to thwart Jared Allen---and was deserving of a game ball for his effort.

Bridges isn't a fatty either---he keeps himself in good shape at 6-5, 318---and he is going to turn 32 this month, which isn't too bad considering he still has a good deal of tread on his tires.

The bottom line is that whenever Bridges plays, the unit seems to play better as a whole. Thus, maybe we shouldn't overlook him.

I am not saying the Cardinals shouldn't try to add another tackle to the mix---but, if let's say the Cardinals wind up drafting David DeCastro or Cordy Glenn and that player becomes the starter at RG, it's possible that Bridges could stave off Snyder at RT and thus Snyder becomes the versatile backup.

Having watched Snyder at RG, however, I really like him there---and like him there a lot. He was the 49ers' best puller---and his pass protection was so good that on most plays he stonewalled the DT at the line of scrimmage and locked him up right there.

But I think Bridges is an unsung player---and I would be very curious to know what his thoughts are this off-season because if he ever had a chance to emerge as a starter in Arizona, this may well be the year.

http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/B-ww...ona+Cardinals+Wild/0REMqoN-5ur/Jeremy+Bridges

/Users/waltermitchell/Pictures/iPhoto Library/Masters/2012/04/06/20120406-083456/Green+Bay+Packers+v+Arizona+Cardinals+Wild+0REMqoN-5url.jpg
 
Last edited:

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,920
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Dougmo

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Posts
156
Reaction score
62
I think Bridges is our best current option at RT.
In that role, I think he's serviceable. If the QB can help the line by having a good feel for the pocket and getting rid of the ball, he'd work.
But it's a position where we could definitely use an upgrade, as you mentioned.
I feel comfortable enough with Bridges,that I'd be severly disappointed if we reached at 13 just to get an OT. There are (hopefully) going to be a few options that could be elite at their positions that woudl really help our team. I'd hate to pass on them to cover a 'need'.
I don't know much about Snyder but seems like he'd be a better fit at RT to me.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
I think Bridges is our best current option at RT.
In that role, I think he's serviceable. If the QB can help the line by having a good feel for the pocket and getting rid of the ball, he'd work.
But it's a position where we could definitely use an upgrade, as you mentioned.
I feel comfortable enough with Bridges,that I'd be severly disappointed if we reached at 13 just to get an OT. There are (hopefully) going to be a few options that could be elite at their positions that woudl really help our team. I'd hate to pass on them to cover a 'need'.
I don't know much about Snyder but seems like he'd be a better fit at RT to me.

I totally agree about not reaching for a tackle at #13, Doug. For one, he wouldn't be the BPA there---or a game changer that some of the others might be.

I too thought Snyder was a better fit at RT...I actually had him as my RT FA hope right after the season...but having watched him at RG, I have changed my mind. He looks very good and comfortable there.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Reviewed Snyder's two games against the Cards after he was signed and thought his play was above average. Bridges is a solid fallback, but am concerned if he was asked to start a full season. We will have other O-lineman in the mix after the draft and would expect a more dynamic right side come September.
 

JAB

Veteran
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Posts
379
Reaction score
0
Location
San Antonio Texas
I think our standards for what a good offensive line is is too low. I would love to see some games where we have the lead and then simply ran out the clock. Our offensive line has improved but not enough to say they're good from what I saw. Too many times we were stuffed on short yardage situations and we still have too many negative rushing plays, penalties and lack of consistent protection.

Are we really going to say, Levi Brown is now a good left tackle? I think we also forget the second half of the season was a much easier schedule than the first. I definitely need to see them hold up in big games against elite defenses to at least an even standard before I'm going to throw any credit their way.

Unfortunately IMO part if not most of the problem is our coaching and strategies. Watching good pass rushers run free, and continually refusing to double-team them gets frustrating. One would think we would start the game with a TE over their best pass rusher. Watching teams rush three or four men and getting pressure continuously, because our line is either confused to what their pass protection is or haven't been taught to work as a unit is also frustrating. How many times does the other team get pressure with us having the numbers in protection? They may have looked better the second half of the year against a weaker schedule but I still believe they have a long ways to go.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Reviewed Snyder's two games against the Cards after he was signed and thought his play was above average. Bridges is a solid fallback, but am concerned if he was asked to start a full season. We will have other O-lineman in the mix after the draft and would expect a more dynamic right side come September.

I too share your concern---but, as Doug said, I hope we don't reach for a tackle at #13 because I think we can get a good one later who might be ready to step in the latter half of the season if Bridges needs relief.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
I think our standards for what a good offensive line is is too low. I would love to see some games where we have the lead and then simply ran out the clock. Our offensive line has improved but not enough to say they're good from what I saw. Too many times we were stuffed on short yardage situations and we still have too many negative rushing plays, penalties and lack of consistent protection.

Are we really going to say, Levi Brown is now a good left tackle? I think we also forget the second half of the season was a much easier schedule than the first. I definitely need to see them hold up in big games against elite defenses to at least an even standard before I'm going to throw any credit their way.

Unfortunately IMO part if not most of the problem is our coaching and strategies. Watching good pass rushers run free, and continually refusing to double-team them gets frustrating. One would think we would start the game with a TE over their best pass rusher. Watching teams rush three or four men and getting pressure continuously, because our line is either confused to what their pass protection is or haven't been taught to work as a unit is also frustrating. How many times does the other team get pressure with us having the numbers in protection? They may have looked better the second half of the year against a weaker schedule but I still believe they have a long ways to go.

Great points...many of which speak to the coaching rather than the personnel.

Like you said, you'd like to see the o-line secure a win by running the ball---but, if you recall, the coaches keep passing the ball more than normal in those situations.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
I too share your concern---but, as Doug said, I hope we don't reach for a tackle at #13 because I think we can get a good one later who might be ready to step in the latter half of the season if Bridges needs relief.

I don't want a reach at #13 either and believe that is in the Cards past not present. Decastro would be considered an indisputable good selection and increasingly I'm inclined to believe, given the relative talents below the super 6, that Glenn would be largely non controversial.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
I don't want a reach at #13 either and believe that is in the Cards past not present. Decastro would be considered an indisputable good selection and increasingly I'm inclined to believe, given the relative talents below the super 6, that Glenn would be largely non controversial.

Yes---I have no problems with DeCastro or Glenn and would be especially happy if we could trade down to add a 2nd or a 3rd and still take Glenn. And I am of the belief that Glenn could be a very good RT---maybe not immediately, but soon enough. Most scouts prefer him inside---but usually those scouts are not the Cardinals' when it comes to picking tackles.:D
 

Vermont Maverick

Registered
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
1,861
Reaction score
181
Location
Williston, Vermont
Who were Georgia's Tackles in 2010? Were they good? I ask because they had Glenn at guard then. Seems like if Georgia thought he could handle Tackle, they would have had him there before last year, unless they had some really good Tackles already.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Who were Georgia's Tackles in 2010? Were they good? I ask because they had Glenn at guard then. Seems like if Georgia thought he could handle Tackle, they would have had him there before last year, unless they had some really good Tackles already.

He was a kid maturing into a role in a tough conference. He started at every position save centre over his time at Georgia. Viewed as athletically versatile and best suited as a R-guard / R-tackle. Truly impressive at Senior Bowl practices and Combine.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Who were Georgia's Tackles in 2010? Were they good? I ask because they had Glenn at guard then. Seems like if Georgia thought he could handle Tackle, they would have had him there before last year, unless they had some really good Tackles already.

They were 1st Team All SEC 2010 LT Clint Boling (#101 pick---4th Round 2011 CIN) and RT Josh Davis (2011 CHI PS---2 year starter at RT for Georgia). Boling was drafted to play guard where he made 3 starts as a rookie last year. Cordy Glenn played LG in 2010 and was moved to LT in 2011 and earned 1st team All-SEC.
 
Last edited:

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,047
Reaction score
70,110
question for all you "this line's gonna be okay because Bridges can step in at RT" people... what the hell does that say about our coaches who continually trotted that piece of trash Keith out there to get destroyed every game when they had a better player on the bench?
 

bg7brd

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Posts
2,188
Reaction score
98
We need a Left Tackle and get Levi to the right side where he belongs. Maybe Glenn can play the left side if he drops 35 lbs, I don't know.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,062
Posts
5,431,320
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top