So today on Gambo & Ash they were talking about how the Suns should/will have Raja Bell on Michael Finley to start the game, if thats true, I think my brain will melt. Does it make sense to anyone to put an All NBA First Team defender on Michael Finley? All Finley can do is hit wide open threes with his feet set, thats it. Putting Raja on him is a complete waste of resources. Its like putting a rocket engine in a Geo Metro, just why?
So I called in (I'm "Will, in Phoenix") and told them I think the better match up (as far as starters are concerned) is:
Nash on Bowen
James Jones on Finley
Raja Bell on Tony Parker
Amare on Elson
Marion on Duncan
This seems to be the most sensible match up to me. Nash can hide on Bowen, Jones can cover Finley fine by the three point line and then go on the break, Amare hopefully stays out of foul trouble on Elson, the teams best perimeter defender is on Bell, and Marion, who is pretty 'long' can pester Duncan.
The other good thing about these match ups is that it throws different looks at the Spurs. If part of the game Duncan is being defended by Marion,and the other part by KT, those are two totally different styles he has to adjust to. Once Manu comes in, I'd switch Bell onto him, and Marion onto Parker, and bring KT in for Jones, and put KT on Duncan. This gives Parker two very different defenses (Bell and Marion) to adjust to all game as well.
So anyway, am I crazy for thinking Bell on Finley is a complete waste? Also, I think it was Gambo who said KT should start, and I can't disagree more. First off, you go with what got you here (and thats not starting KT, didnt we learn anything from Avery messing w/ his starting 5?), and that gives Duncan someone to cover. If you go w/ the regular starting 5, Duncan will have to guard either Marion or James Jones, both of who are huge mismatches for him. Marion can blow by him and beat him off the dribble, and Jones will just stand in the corner and jack 3's (and Duncan won't want to come out to guard him), so I think starting KT is an awful idea.
Anyway, thoughts?
So I called in (I'm "Will, in Phoenix") and told them I think the better match up (as far as starters are concerned) is:
Nash on Bowen
James Jones on Finley
Raja Bell on Tony Parker
Amare on Elson
Marion on Duncan
This seems to be the most sensible match up to me. Nash can hide on Bowen, Jones can cover Finley fine by the three point line and then go on the break, Amare hopefully stays out of foul trouble on Elson, the teams best perimeter defender is on Bell, and Marion, who is pretty 'long' can pester Duncan.
The other good thing about these match ups is that it throws different looks at the Spurs. If part of the game Duncan is being defended by Marion,and the other part by KT, those are two totally different styles he has to adjust to. Once Manu comes in, I'd switch Bell onto him, and Marion onto Parker, and bring KT in for Jones, and put KT on Duncan. This gives Parker two very different defenses (Bell and Marion) to adjust to all game as well.
So anyway, am I crazy for thinking Bell on Finley is a complete waste? Also, I think it was Gambo who said KT should start, and I can't disagree more. First off, you go with what got you here (and thats not starting KT, didnt we learn anything from Avery messing w/ his starting 5?), and that gives Duncan someone to cover. If you go w/ the regular starting 5, Duncan will have to guard either Marion or James Jones, both of who are huge mismatches for him. Marion can blow by him and beat him off the dribble, and Jones will just stand in the corner and jack 3's (and Duncan won't want to come out to guard him), so I think starting KT is an awful idea.
Anyway, thoughts?