Stanford is a way better QB than Goff. People need to get the marginally better thought out of their mind.
Goff has a better career QB rating
Stanford is a way better QB than Goff. People need to get the marginally better thought out of their mind.
Stats lie. Plus he’s had fewer years and better weapons.Goff has a better career QB rating
Yeah I don't think Stafford IS George or Cutler but he's basically always been a guy with a great arm, who takes too many sacks and throws too many picks. I think he cares about the game far more than they did, and Palmer is a good comp. Just depends how the back is, Palmer had a knee issue obviously but a back issue for a QB seems much more career limiting to me.
I had to google but just last year there were reports he told the Lions he might retire, after the 2019 season. he had the back problem, his wife had just had brain surgery, he had 2 young kids and told them he was considering retiring because he wanted to be able to walk when his kids grew up.
obviously he didn't, but I think in that sense he's much closer to retiring than Palmer was, and Carson actually DID retire in order to force the trade.
Will be interesting I like Stafford, I just think there's a big health risk there for the Rams but it also may be they knew they couldn't win with Goff and were're sure they could with Wolford so they decided to take a shot with Stafford.
Yeah. He’ll have good wrs with the Rams but had arguably better receivers with the lions. Rbs and oline is an entirely different matter altogether.lol... ehhhh he has always had good to great WRs.... having a D that can win games by itself is what matters most.
Qb isn't just about talent, is about having the right mindset to be a winner
Something we questioning about Murray even if he is just 23 but we can easily say about Stafford
Unless you’re Keim. You can play for any year. Doesn’t matter.Imagine thinking you can play the long game in the NFC West. No one plays for next year in this division. That will get you fired.
Yup. Proves there are multiple ways to effectively construct a team. But you have to have a savvy and creative front office and excellent coaching.And still compete every year.
Some of the best leaders have never won. While winning is what most look to in determining leadership each (winning and leadership) are only a component of the other. Too many variables to discount leadership due to winning percentage.oh he because he said he was well then that’s different I thought it was maybe because he actually led them to something that mattered over his decade long career
But yeah.
I will never understand this. I mean the topic is clearly related to the Cardinals and there’s enough people discussing it that it’s a viable topic. If you don’t want to participate in the conversation just ignore the post and move on.Like Cheese, you both are taking this out of context. Maybe I was too exhausted to better explain my position. Just tired of listening to everybody whine about what other teams in our division are doing. I'm fine with debating what the Cardinals are or are not doing to improve themselves.
I believe it’s because we haven’t had a young developing QB of this caliber since the cards moved to AZ and we’ve seen the short duration on the Warner’s and palmers.I do find it a little ironic that people on this board are doubting bailing on the development of a QB in favor of a proven veteran when our organization has only ever really had success when we have gone that direction. Warner and Palmer. I know the cost was different, but still.
For what it is worth, I do expect Keim to make a move this offseason. I don't believe he is going to run to believe running it back this year is going to make up the gap in this division. We will see if what he does actually works. I expect a lot of re-worked contracts to free up space short term and potentially a trade back in round 1 to get more picks if certain players are off the board. I also don't believe we will head into the draft with Mason Cole as our starting C.
Hey, the "we" was about the forum, I m one of biggest Murray fan hereKyler has 4th quarter comebacks and 6 game winning drives in his short career if your questioning if he has a mindset as a winner you haven’t been paying attention
That was said about the Cooks deal, the Gurley contract, and the Ramsey deal and they are still competing every year. Does it limit their ability to sign mid-level players but as long as they get league average production with their other picks, they are fine.My gut feeling is the Rams will regret this trade some day.
Off-season hasn’t started for us yet. Hopefully we see some material moves to better the team. And we have a built-in advantage that kyler (and likely Simmons) likely still has growth left as a week-in/week-out impact player. So that improvement comes at zero cost to the team.Just incredible, barring major changes, it's hard to imagine anyone having us ahead of 4th in the division going into the season.
McVay is a very good coach, so he’s able to overcome these blunders by the organization. A great coach makes a HUGE difference.That was said about the Cooks deal, the Gurley contract, and the Ramsey deal and they are still competing every year. Does it limit their ability to sign mid-level players but as long as they get league average production with their other picks, they are fine.
McVay is a very good coach, so he’s able to overcome these blunders by the organization. A great coach makes a HUGE difference.
Kyler has 4th quarter comebacks and 6 game winning drives in his short career if your questioning if he has a mindset as a winner you haven’t been paying attention
This is interesting. This is ASFN, I would think that stuff would be plastered all over this place. Which thread has “many people in and around the organization” talking smack on kyler post-season?Kyler has four 4th Quarter comebacks and six game-winning drives in his first 2 seasons as a starter.
In Matt Stafford's first 2 seasons as a starter, he had... six 4th quarter comebacks and seven game-winning drives.
This also vastly confuses process and results. In Stafford's first full season as a starter he passed for 5000+ yards and 41 TDs. In Kyler's second season, he passed for fewer than 4000 yards and 26 TDs (yes, he also had 800 rushing yards and 11 rushing TDs, but I'll let you do the math).
I've never heard anyone question Stafford's work ethic or preparation. The fact that a parade of head coaches have never turned on him despite astronomical salaries supports the assertion that Stafford hasn't been the problem in Detroit.
If you're listening closely, you'd hear that after Kyler's fake-breakout season, many people in and around the organization are talking about the things Kyler has to do "off the field" and "during the week" that will take him to the next level. What do you think that means?