RB Conner re-signs with Cards

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,648
Reaction score
30,407
Location
Gilbert, AZ
The problem was that our coach significantly overworked him in the Seattle game and got him hurt, which is why he barely played in the playoff game. Doesn't get talked about but with Conner healthy it's likely an entirely different game plan and outcome (not saying we would win but the score would have been better).
He had 15 rushes and 21 touches. That's average RB work, bro. Eno Benjamin in that game had 7 rushes and 11 total touches.
 

GoldGloveschmidt

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Posts
4,322
Reaction score
7,148
He had 15 rushes and 21 touches. That's average RB work, bro. Eno Benjamin in that game had 7 rushes and 11 total touches.

He shouldn't have seen average RB work in a basically meaningless game. And he left injured so he would have received more volume. We suck at home so there was no need to go all out for a home playoff game. Eno and Ward should have had all the work.

And this isn't 20/20 hindsight either.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220330-100040_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20220330-100040_Chrome.jpg
    96.1 KB · Views: 7

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,648
Reaction score
30,407
Location
Gilbert, AZ
He shouldn't have seen average RB work in a basically meaningless game. And he left injured so he would have received more volume. We suck at home so there was no need to go all out for a home playoff game. Eno and Ward should have had all the work.

And this isn't 20/20 hindsight either.
He had 2 TDs in that game, and it was in a maelstrom of ineptitude we were trying to pull out from.

I don't want to relitigate the question of whether having a home playoff game is good. Based on the results of our ROAD playoff game, it couldn't have been much worse.

James Conner isn't/wasn't the centerpiece of our offense and there's nothing special about him. Please post in advance all the players we should place in bubble wrap until the highest-leverage situations.

Kyler
DHop
Baker
Ertz
M. Williams
Watt
Conner (apparently)
 

THESMEL

Smushdown! Take it like a fan!
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
5,968
Reaction score
1,160
Location
Vernon
Rewriting history so soon. I mean damn it James Conner earned More! So it’s a bargain. he didn’t start, and made the pro bowl for crying out loud. No Conner no playoffs it is that simple. Look at the games started if folks forget that quick. -athletic is total of like 300 runs to 500 passes.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,392
Reaction score
27,123
Location
Orlando, FL
There’s always a concern when you’re paying for intangibles. I agree with this signing. This is one of those times I don’t believe you can rate a player solely based on numbers. He made the players around him better and I think he was a must retain.
 

AZ Native

Living is Easy with Eyes Closed
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Posts
16,035
Reaction score
8,569
Location
Cave Creek
There’s always a concern when you’re paying for intangibles. I agree with this signing. This is one of those times I don’t believe you can rate a player solely based on numbers. He made the players around him better and I think he was a must retain.
Agreed
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,294
Reaction score
35,907
Location
BirdGangThing
It's not a terrible idea to defer some money to 2023 if it isn't a crazy number. The Cardinals have a metric buttload of cap space in 2023.
Ok...

A) Can you please quantify a buttload?
B) Are you sure it's metric? This isn't the CFL, however if the team doesn't get better they may be relegated to that league.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,497
Reaction score
34,503
Location
Charlotte, NC
Ok...

A) Can you please quantify a buttload?
B) Are you sure it's metric? This isn't the CFL, however if the team doesn't get better they may be relegated to that league.
It's not quite known, but estimates have gone as high as $100 million.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,118
Reaction score
24,592
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
It's not quite known, but estimates have gone as high as $100 million.
That is not a good thing, though, this team having a ton of cap space, right? You keep pointing out that they don't have the cash to shell out big contracts and shouldn't spend a lot in FA. KM's contract will cost a chunk of change, hopefully after the season, but we certainly don't have enough of our own young talent to spend it on. So how is that a good thing for us?
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,497
Reaction score
34,503
Location
Charlotte, NC
That is not a good thing, though, this team having a ton of cap space, right? You keep pointing out that they don't have the cash to shell out big contracts and shouldn't spend a lot in FA. KM's contract will cost a chunk of change, hopefully after the season, but we certainly don't have enough of our own young talent to spend it on. So how is that a good thing for us?
Flexibility.
 

TRW

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Posts
7,858
Reaction score
7,590
Location
Avondale, AZ
I can’t recall which season but I recall that being a battle cry before the cards and it ended being a dud. Flexibility without a good game plan is meaningless.
Fairly common for the "they will have a ton of cap space next year" to be the battle cry. At least, that's how it seems to me. I could be misremembering though :cool:
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,119
Reaction score
59,097
Location
SoCal
I mean there was a year where the cardinals were literally rolling out “FLEXIBILITY!!!” as the answer to everything. I wish I could recall the year…
 

THESMEL

Smushdown! Take it like a fan!
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
5,968
Reaction score
1,160
Location
Vernon
Well Wilkes went to dumping talent after we went belly up, as -layers wanted the hell out, fortunes have changed quite a bit this year, but players don’t consider cards a premier destination like for BA
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,826
Reaction score
41,696
Location
UK
What you need to bare in mind with Conner is that despite being a dual threat in Pit the Cards didn't throw him the ball until game 9 and he missed 2 games late in the season.

The 375 yards he had and all those 1 handed catches all came in 7 games in the 2nd half of the year. Which was a terrible coaching decision. Not sure what Kliff was doing.

Had they used him the same way the full season he would have had 800 receiving yards. Which is surely what they intend and why he was paid what he was.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,118
Reaction score
24,592
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
What you need to bare in mind with Conner is that despite being a dual threat in Pit the Cards didn't throw him the ball until game 9 and he missed 2 games late in the season.

The 375 yards he had and all those 1 handed catches all came in 7 games in the 2nd half of the year. Which was a terrible coaching decision. Not sure what Kliff was doing.

Had they used him the same way the full season he would have had 800 receiving yards. Which is surely what they intend and why he was paid what he was.
Where this kind of falls apart is the reason they started doing so was due to Edmonds going out. And the problem there is that JC was subsequently overused and ended up hurt. You just can't expect JC to go out as the #1 with no co-starter and just rack up tons of rushing and receiving yards, as well as TDs, without breaking down. And what do we do when our ONLY viable starting RB breaks down?

This isn't to say he wasn't good last year; he was. When Edmonds had HIS inevitable injury, however, our coaching staff leaned too heavily on JC. We definitely need another back that can share the load. If we give JC almost all the touches from game 1, we'll be making a mistake.
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
64,266
Reaction score
30,492
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
Where this kind of falls apart is the reason they started doing so was due to Edmonds going out. And the problem there is that JC was subsequently overused and ended up hurt. You just can't expect JC to go out as the #1 with no co-starter and just rack up tons of rushing and receiving yards, as well as TDs, without breaking down. And what do we do when our ONLY viable starting RB breaks down?

This isn't to say he wasn't good last year; he was. When Edmonds had HIS inevitable injury, however, our coaching staff leaned too heavily on JC. We definitely need another back that can share the load. If we give JC almost all the touches from game 1, we'll be making a mistake.
We definitely need another back to share the load

We can't expect Conner to play every game and most of the downs
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,826
Reaction score
41,696
Location
UK
Where this kind of falls apart is the reason they started doing so was due to Edmonds going out. And the problem there is that JC was subsequently overused and ended up hurt. You just can't expect JC to go out as the #1 with no co-starter and just rack up tons of rushing and receiving yards, as well as TDs, without breaking down. And what do we do when our ONLY viable starting RB breaks down?

This isn't to say he wasn't good last year; he was. When Edmonds had HIS inevitable injury, however, our coaching staff leaned too heavily on JC. We definitely need another back that can share the load. If we give JC almost all the touches from game 1, we'll be making a mistake.

People can;t make the "We don't know what they see in practice" argument for one thread and ignore it on the next.

It was pretty poor of the coaching staff not to recognize Conner was also a receiving threat from either a) his history or b) his practice. If anything Conner was a far better receiver than Chase. Chase has never been much more than a checkdown king. Conner complete owned Edmonds in every receiving statistic last year.

YPC 10.1 vs 7.2
YAC 10.1 vs 7.5
Drops 0 vs 3
Catch % 95% vs 81%
Passer rating 132 vs 91
TDs 3 vs 0

Conner is a much more dynamic receiving threat than Chase. It was pretty poor of the coaching not to recognize that and only start using it in game 9.

People keep saying Conner was over paid. Yet he's only on a mil more than Chase and Chase only had 2 TD's all year.

I was all for keeping Edmonds over Conner but having seen both deals Conners is by far the better value.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,119
Reaction score
59,097
Location
SoCal
What you need to bare in mind with Conner is that despite being a dual threat in Pit the Cards didn't throw him the ball until game 9 and he missed 2 games late in the season.

The 375 yards he had and all those 1 handed catches all came in 7 games in the 2nd half of the year. Which was a terrible coaching decision. Not sure what Kliff was doing.

Had they used him the same way the full season he would have had 800 receiving yards. Which is surely what they intend and why he was paid what he was.
I fear he can’t handle that workload.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,118
Reaction score
24,592
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
People can;t make the "We don't know what they see in practice" argument for one thread and ignore it on the next.

It was pretty poor of the coaching staff not to recognize Conner was also a receiving threat from either a) his history or b) his practice. If anything Conner was a far better receiver than Chase. Chase has never been much more than a checkdown king. Conner complete owned Edmonds in every receiving statistic last year.

YPC 10.1 vs 7.2
YAC 10.1 vs 7.5
Drops 0 vs 3
Catch % 95% vs 81%
Passer rating 132 vs 91
TDs 3 vs 0

Conner is a much more dynamic receiving threat than Chase. It was pretty poor of the coaching not to recognize that and only start using it in game 9.

People keep saying Conner was over paid. Yet he's only on a mil more than Chase and Chase only had 2 TD's all year.

I was all for keeping Edmonds over Conner but having seen both deals Conners is by far the better value.
Overworking JC is a bad, bad idea. Involve him more in the passing game, certainly, but don't give him extra reps to do it.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,826
Reaction score
41,696
Location
UK
I fear he can’t handle that workload.

I don't expect him to have a heavier workload than he did the 2nd half of the season. I still expect him to split the load with at least one other back.

I just expect him to get more receiving work over the whole season instead of only activating "Receiving mode" after game 8. He averaged over 50 yards a game in the 7 games he played after that point.

Something like 15 carries / 5 targets per game.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,648
Reaction score
30,407
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I don't expect him to have a heavier workload than he did the 2nd half of the season. I still expect him to split the load with at least one other back.

I just expect him to get more receiving work over the whole season instead of only activating "Receiving mode" after game 8. He averaged over 50 yards a game in the 7 games he played after that point.

Something like 15 carries / 5 targets per game.
The second half of the season when he… got injured and averaged less than 4 YPC?

Co-sign
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,296
Reaction score
23,892
It’s going to be a funny, but yet, sad sight to see when Conner is averaging 3.8 YPC & doesn’t finish with half as many total TDs as he did last season. Realization will come probably around week 11.
 
Top