Seriously?
The dude is literally unstoppable.... WHEN HIS HEAD IS IN THE GAME. You don't pay a guy the max when you are working with that big a caveat....
He will be paid the max by someone. He is a franchise player. You don't let those go.
Seriously?
The dude is literally unstoppable.... WHEN HIS HEAD IS IN THE GAME. You don't pay a guy the max when you are working with that big a caveat....
Quite frankly i'll be sick if we lose Amare and Nash lingers here for the next 2 yrs @ $22mill against the cap.
Quite frankly i'll be sick if we lose Amare and Nash lingers here for the next 2 yrs @ $22mill against the cap.
Absolutely. I've gone on record as saying that extending Nash was a mistake(i realize that i'm nearly alone in my stance but thats ok).Sure, but for double the average salary? Because that's what a maximum extension for Stoudemire would be: twice what Nash is making.
Absolutely. I've gone on record as saying that extending Nash was a mistake(i realize that i'm nearly alone in my stance but thats ok). I will officially go on the record as saying that letting Amare go now would be equally as short-sighted.
No, i really do feel that way.Okay, I know you're just making a point but take a minute here and I think you'll realize you probably don't really feel that way. BTW, don't you just love it when a stranger tells you how you really feel? I think someone could reasonably argue either side of the Nash extension but losing Amare for nothing is clearly going to hurt us much more than either extending Nash or failing to do so, JMNSHO.
Steve
No, i really do feel that way.
Anyone here can vouch for that. I've been in a few cyber cage fights over the subject of Nash and his current stranglehold of this franchise.
Kobe, LeBron, Dwight Howard, and Kevin Durant all deserve max deals.
Amare's in the next class, IMO, but I don't know what that number is. He doesn't change the game like the four above. He doesn't impose his will like they do.
Do people realize what "Giving Amare a max deal" actually means?
It will financially cripple this team for YEARS.
No it won't. It'll be 3 or 4 million more than he's already making and this team has so many kids on rookie contracts that by the time they're up for bigger ones, Nash and Hill will be gone so there will be money to go around.
Bottom line - most teams need TWO guys who are making MAX or near MAX if they're gonna win title. Amare is the one of those two guys. Once Nash retires, it'll be up to the team to find out who the other is.
I'd rather the team be financially crippled than just plain crippled.Do people realize what "Giving Amare a max deal" actually means?
It will financially cripple this team for YEARS.
I'd rather the team be financially crippled than just plain crippled.
You must be registered for see images
I can see it now:
SUNS,Nash retool in '2011 by securing David Lee.Grant Hill returns,..........
You must be registered for see images
I am sure Amare's knee will leave the team crippled as well.
Exactly. Don't forget, this coming year is year 5 since his surgery. That's the expected time between necessary follow up repairs. Pay Amare the max at the team's peril....
someone remind me again when Jason Kidd had his micro-fracture knee re-mirco'd? Oh yeah... he hasn't and he had his before Amare... and is still playing good basketball ten years Amare's elder. You guys are thinking in the past. Amare's not T-Mac.
You don't give up your superstar JUST when he finally becomes one and enters his prime. Especially when you're one of the top teams in the league... which we are and we could continue to be next year with expected improvement from our young guys.
I can see it now:
SUNS,Nash retool in '2011 by securing David Lee.Grant Hill returns,..........
. Amare's not T-Mac.
Hes closer to tmac injury wise than he is jason kidd.
How does everyone think Amare would perform without Nash? I'm not sure he would blossom. I see the Blazers loading up against Amare and him having no answers for it. That's what he would face every game without Nash. I fear Amare's numbers may be swollen from the Nash effect. What happens when Nash retires and we have Amare's rather robust contract still? Just a fear of mine though. He could also end up being the man. Personally, I say keep him. He's better than anything else we could throw our money at. I'm just curious what other people think about this.