I'm pretty sure players can only have 8% annual increases unless they are coming off a rookie deal. The only players I've seen have a back loaded contract were RFA's coming off of their rookie deal. I believe it's called the poison pill provision.
You're right, I forgot about that. Either way, it seems we could easily clear $2.6m.You are right on the poison pill but 8% is if you're retaining your own players otherwise it's 5%. It's less than $1 million a year in total though so I don't see it as much of an issue to over come. Move Melton and Okobo and we get it done.
You're right, I forgot about that. Either way, it seems we could easily clear $2.6m.
Trade Josh Jackson to NYK for nothing and suddenly we're still players in free agency.
Then hopefully he's pissed going to the Suns and retires. Maybe that would free up the 3 mil?Either the Knicks or trade him to Cleveland for JR Smith, who moved his guarantee date back. The Knicks haven't done anything that makes sense but Koby Altman, the Cavs GM, has long been a fan of Jackson and nixed the Bledsoe deal because he wasn't included. Now he can get him for nothing, essentially. I think the Suns want more but they could send Jackson, Melton, and Okobo there for JR and then waive him. His salary is $15 million but only $3 million guaranteed. So we'd actually open up some space that way. Enough to have basically 2 more deals around the size of the room exception, one being with cap space and the other being the room exception itself.
You must be registered for see images attach
Bickley butt hurt we didn't get DLo. He's been writting articles of doom if we did not sign him.
Bickley is always butt-hurt about something. He's a straight-up clown.
Signing Rubio is one of the many moves to ignite the Suns becoming an actual NBA team. You are not getting top tier free agents when you are the worst team in the league. It's about building some credibility now.
Didn't people say the exact same thing when we signed Tyson Chandler and Trevor Ariza?...
Stop bringing up facts.Just yesterday you said you'd be fine with Rubio.
Just yesterday you said you'd be fine with Rubio.
How do we know Bridges or Oubre wont be those guys? Just saying...I'm okay with Rubio, but only because some of the other options being bandied about (Joseph, Rozier, McConnell, Cook, nobody) were downright frightening. He was fifth on my acceptable list, behind Brogdon, Russell, Beverley and Wright.
I was commenting on the "building some credibility" comment. At some point, this front office will need to acquire a third star to have any hope of keeping up with the rest of the NBA, and that is assuming Booker and Ayton develop into superstars. Settling for second tier guys indefinitely isn't going to take this team anywhere.
As I said previously, if the cost savings between an All-Star in Russell and a below average starter (though indeed a starter, which is better than what we had) nets something of value basketball-wise, rather than money in Sarver's pocket, I can get behind this. If it is just about the cost savings, I will not be pleased, and far more important, neither will Booker.
How do we know Bridges or Oubre wont be those guys? Just saying...
I'm okay with Rubio, but only because some of the other options being bandied about (Joseph, Rozier, McConnell, Cook, nobody) were downright frightening. He was fifth on my acceptable list, behind Brogdon, Russell, Beverley and Wright.
I was commenting on the "building some credibility" comment. At some point, this front office will need to acquire a third star to have any hope of keeping up with the rest of the NBA, and that is assuming Booker and Ayton develop into superstars. Settling for second tier guys indefinitely isn't going to take this team anywhere.
As I said previously, if the cost savings between an All-Star in Russell and a below average starter (though indeed a starter, which is better than what we had) nets something of value basketball-wise, rather than money in Sarver's pocket, I can get behind this. If it is just about the cost savings, I will not be pleased, and far more important, neither will Booker.
Just saying Bridges is still developing. We haven't seen his ceiling yet.Because Bridges can't put the ball on the floor or create his own shot. He was always billed as having the ceiling of a good complimentary guy, not a star.
As for Oubre, he isn't re-signed yet, and over the course of four seasons, he too has demonstrated a ceiling of a good complimentary guy, not a star. I love what he brings to the table, but at this point, what you see is what you get with him.
I saw that Holmes was getting interest from Chicago, Bucks, Lakers, and a few other teams. He's not signing for the minimum. Regardless of Holmes coming back or not, Baynes is better than Holmes. He was the best defensive big on Boston's team last year and he can also stretch the floor. He may be used with Ayton some, situationally, but it won't be often.
https://clutchpoints.com/nba-free-agency-rumors-lakers-bucks-bulls-interested-richaun-holmes/
Keep in mind 52% of his assists were finished at the rim. Which means teams have problems keeping him away from the paint.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Im coming around to this move for a lot of the reasons mentioned. The thing that still erks me is giving away TJ for nothing and using that cap to get a comparable player at twice the price.