RON_IN_OC
https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Passed away this morning.
Sent from my XT1056 using Tapatalk
Sent from my XT1056 using Tapatalk
So Gywnn's family is now suing tobacco companies. That is pretty lame IMO.
So Gywnn's family is now suing tobacco companies. That is pretty lame IMO.
I have no use for frivolous lawsuits -- judges and attorneys getting rich at the expense of taxpayers. And, minus the sarcasm, I would have agreed with your point.I'm suing Anheuser Busch for making me drunk. I'm also suing Chevrolet for making my car too fast resulting in getting a speeding ticket.
Gwynn started using dip as a freshman at San Diego State in 1977, according to the lawsuit, and used one and a half to two cans of the product every day until 2008. He had two operations before he was 54 for cancer in his right cheek, between August 2010 and February 2012.
Also named as defendants are two people who ran an intramural softball team called “Skoal Brothers,” which the lawsuit says provided free smokeless tobacco products.
According to the lawsuit, “defendants continued to deluge Tony during his college years with countless free samples of ‘dip’ tobacco products they purposely adulterated to make more addictive. All the while, they did not mention either the highly addictive nature of their products or their toxicity.”
It added: “Once Defendants got Tony addicted to their products, he became a self-described ‘tobacco junkie’ who used 1 1/2 to 2 cans or tins of Defendants’ Skoal per day,” the lawsuit states. “Sadly, the nicotine in the tobacco ultimately caused Tony’s cancer and killed him.”
I have no use for frivolous lawsuits -- judges and attorneys getting rich at the expense of taxpayers. And, minus the sarcasm, I would have agreed with your point.
But this is a very specific issue. How the spit tobacco companies worked with colleges to entice young athletes into becoming addicted. From what I've read elsewhere, they targeted young black athletes in particular. Those kids were easy targets.
More than the money, this issue deserves attention and picks up where the late Joe Garagiola left off.
So before applying generalizations to the situation, you should familiarize yourself with the big picture of what Tony's family is trying to accomplish.
Take a look at Tony's photo in the article and then decide if this shouldn't be made an issue.
http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-87310766/
This wasn't advertised . . .it's still a choice. it's nicotine, it's tobacco. look across america, it's 2016 and men are still dipping all over the place, the health risks are well advertised.
According to the lawsuit, “defendants continued to deluge Tony during his college years with countless free samples of ‘dip’ tobacco products they purposely adulterated to make more addictive. All the while, they did not mention either the highly addictive nature of their products or their toxicity.”