Totally agree no. Not that they don't work hard and try to be interesting but you have to realize recruiting is a bunch of 15-17 year old kids who have no idea what they want to do, and they're talking to these "recruiting analysts", so they tell them all sorts of things to keep their name in the paper. read Telfair's book, he openly jokes about the rise of internet stuff how people come up and ask him something, he answers jokingly and within 4 hours it's all over the net.
Until a recruit signs an LOI, nothing they say means anything. Ask Illinois fans how they feel about all those reports for a year about Eric Gordon and then he bolts on them for Indiana.
I read the free sites, the rumors usually come out eventually anyways, and you react to a lot less stuff.
Last year Bruin report online was using Farmar's ankle injury to try and get people to subscribe to the pay site. They were running ads sign up and get the insider report on his ankle. Problem was, their report was hairline fracture, out for the year, and it wasn't true. think they gave back the money to anybody who signed up to read their false report?