RLakin's Rant ON Coach Green

Status
Not open for further replies.

RLakin

All Star
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
572
Reaction score
0
Location
North Glendale
Re: Ouch!

Originally posted by Krangthebrain
That doesn't sound to good. Good job RLakin...

You proved your point. But one question: The Vikes secondary generally seemed to suck mainly from a talent standpoint. Wasn't a lack of talent a big factor in why the secondary sucked?

And that’s a valid point. The only thing I would say on that is, Willie Shaw did have some success w/ the Vikings DBs before Solomon was there and as we saw (especially) last year, they’ve had more success after. The other thing is the comments from guys like Lee, Clemons, and Hitchcock. The anonymous quotes are damming as well, but in the interest of fairness I’ll stick to the named individuals that are out there. What you were hearing from them is a line that I think most Cardinals fans would cringe at, especially with the recent reports of Wilson’s moving to CB and the possible drafting of Sean Taylor. The line is that Solomon isn’t a good teacher. Better yet, that they weren’t learning anything. This is something that Joe Greene was constantly (and probably rightly) ridiculed for in Arizona, and mind you there weren’t any of the types of quotes like I’ve posted here. The quotes have also come from cornerbacks that played under Solomon during different eras. Jimmy Hitchcock joined the Vikings in 1998, 5 years after Carl Lee played his last game with the team. Also, Lee (more to the first point) was a three-time Pro Bowler.

Nidan:
As far as context, it’s a pretty easy argument to make, but I really don’t see that angle being applicable in this case. For instance, when Carl Lee says “the unfortunate truth is, I know more about playing cornerback than (Solomon) does," I don’t think he’s coming back with the line “just kidding,” (which is then cut by the writer). Ditto for the Hitchcock and Clemons stuff. It’s pretty clear where those guys and the writers stand. I can post the whole articles if you like, although I doubt the mods would be very happy with that. Also, keep in mind that this an opinion piece, so it serves me little purpose to have an inner debate in the middle of the article. I research the subject, interpret the data, make my conclusion, and then put pen to paper. It’s quite different than the straight journalism type article that I believe you’re making reference to.

To sum it up for those who want to make this an intelligent debate (i.e. no one who brings anti-Americanism, implied racism, or refers to fake conversations between people they don’t even know.) And let me just clear the record for the guy who continually brings up a disagreement that Ron Wolfley and I never had. First, I don’t recall ever talking to him about that subject, and if I did he would have absolutely no problem my taking the other side. We’re in talk-radio. That’s kind of the trick.
 

Rats

Somanyfreaks,SofewCircus'
Joined
Sep 28, 2002
Posts
4,075
Reaction score
6
Originally posted by ajcardfan
Ripping on the Cardinals' front office decisions takes little talent.
This article by Lakin would be much more interesting if he put his own balls on the line by saying what HE would've done differently.

So, Lakin, who would you have hired as coach?
He pimped Romeo Crennel....because he said that a name coach wouldn't come here and that Green...would never go for the way the Bidwills run there front office....this guy is a hack and is just looking for a reaction. I would be suprised if he ever even watched a Cards game with out at least one eye on whatever home town team he roots for......I will take Coach Greens record on and off the field and stack it against any coach in the game. It takes toughness and focus to make the decisions that these coaches have to make and I would not want any other guy making the calls for the Cards. RG and Green are football guys....RLAkin is a hack with to much time on his hands.........
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Originally posted by nidan
OK, Wally, if you like it so much I'd love to see you or Lakin dispute Vike's comments.

Heck, Vike isn't even a Cardinals fan.

Nope. I don't care to get involved in one of Vike's rants. Whenever I attempt to engage in a discussion, he just calls me a racist , when he knows I whooped him. Haven't figured that one out yet, although I have my suspicions as to why he uses that as his sledge hammer. I haven't gotten an answer from him on why as a Vikes fan he feels comfortable on a Cards board. I can only conclude he has a fixation on Green. I don't have a problem with R Lakin's comments since they seem to be supported by plenty of reasearch and are the expressed opinions of sports journalists.

Green's Cardinal record is still 0-0. Show me the wins.:bang:
 

NickelBack

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Posts
3,640
Reaction score
1
Originally posted by WizardOfAz
From www.azgameday.com

Joining Solomon (in that odd order) on the Cardinals defensive staff was coordinator Clancy Pendergast whose family had business ties to the Bidwills...

Courtesy of Rod Lakin - Producer and Host AZGameday


I suppose Roc Lakin will ignore this like he did AJ, but I wonder if he has facts or anything to back up this point. Maybe he should check with Wolfley first.
 

RLakin

All Star
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
572
Reaction score
0
Location
North Glendale
Re: Re: RLakin's Rant On Coach Green

Originally posted by NickelBack
I suppose Roc Lakin will ignore this like he did AJ, but I wonder if he has facts or anything to back up this point. Maybe he should check with Wolfley first.

By Dan Daly
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Clancy Pendergast, brought in by Denny Green last week to be the Cardinals' defensive coordinator, has an interesting connection to the team. "He is a member of the Pendergast family," the Arizona Republic reported, "which owned the land that the Cardinals purchased for their [new] stadium, set to open in 2006."
 

NickelBack

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Posts
3,640
Reaction score
1
Re: Re: Re: RLakin's Rant On Coach Green

Originally posted by RLakin
By Dan Daly
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Clancy Pendergast, brought in by Denny Green last week to be the Cardinals' defensive coordinator, has an interesting connection to the team. "He is a member of the Pendergast family," the Arizona Republic reported, "which owned the land that the Cardinals purchased for their [new] stadium, set to open in 2006."


...and?!?

What does one have to do with the other? Should the fact that his father farmed that land somehow disqualify him to coach here? And, by the way, this is old news as there was a thread on that already.
 

SECTION 11

vibraslap
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
16,393
Reaction score
4,877
Location
Between the Pipes
Re: Re: Re: Re: RLakin's Rant On Coach Green

Originally posted by NickelBack
...and?!?

What does one have to do with the other? Should the fact that his father farmed that land somehow disqualify him to coach here? And, by the way, this is old news as there was a thread on that already.

He's been a coach in the NFL for the last eight years, btw.
 

Sandan

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
25,016
Reaction score
2,467
Location
Plymouth, UK
Re: Re: Ouch!

Originally posted by RLakin
Nidan:
As far as context, it’s a pretty easy argument to make, but I really don’t see that angle being applicable in this case. For instance, when Carl Lee says “the unfortunate truth is, I know more about playing cornerback than (Solomon) does," I don’t think he’s coming back with the line “just kidding,” (which is then cut by the writer). Ditto for the Hitchcock and Clemons stuff. It’s pretty clear where those guys and the writers stand. I can post the whole articles if you like, although I doubt the mods would be very happy with that. Also, keep in mind that this an opinion piece, so it serves me little purpose to have an inner debate in the middle of the article. I research the subject, interpret the data, make my conclusion, and then put pen to paper. It’s quite different than the straight journalism type article that I believe you’re making reference to.

To sum it up for those who want to make this an intelligent debate (i.e. no one who brings anti-Americanism, implied racism, or refers to fake conversations between people they don’t even know.) And let me just clear the record for the guy who continually brings up a disagreement that Ron Wolfley and I never had. First, I don’t recall ever talking to him about that subject, and if I did he would have absolutely no problem my taking the other side. We’re in talk-radio. That’s kind of the trick.

I guess what I find strange is that on the board here you are articulate and thoughtful, when you are writing for work you seem to need to spice it up.

Ok, what is you conclusion, I'm still confused. Is Green a smuck (aka Buddy), if he is as you have implied then what should the Cardinals have done in the head coach arena.

From where I sit (with admitedly far less knowledge, no sarcasm implied), they appear to have hired the best person available. Do you disagree ?

Is Soloman a poor choice, I personally don't know. I guess we will have to wait and see what Greens results are and hold him accountable in the same way he intends to hold players accountable. Soloman seems to be the big thing you have against Green.

Kudos for responding, as I said a lively debate is a good thing but I still don't understand you conclusion that we are all doomed even before the season starts.

btw: As a mod on this board I can tell you that comments are encouraged, good, bad negative or positive. It's only trolls that get booted and you at least are willing to defend your position. So I wouldn't worry to much about the moderators getting to ticked off.

Heck if we booted people for negative comments Chessie would have been history a long time ago :)
 

Sandan

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
25,016
Reaction score
2,467
Location
Plymouth, UK
Originally posted by wallyburger
why as a Vikes fan he feels comfortable on a Cards board. I can only conclude he has a fixation on Green.

I for one appreciate his comments
 

Sandan

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
25,016
Reaction score
2,467
Location
Plymouth, UK
Re: Re: Re: Re: RLakin's Rant On Coach Green

Originally posted by NickelBack
...and?!?

What does one have to do with the other? Should the fact that his father farmed that land somehow disqualify him to coach here? And, by the way, this is old news as there was a thread on that already.

Rlakin, this a good example of what I meant, so what ?

From what I can seem he seems to be a qualified NFL coach
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
39,338
Reaction score
27,263
Originally posted by Duckjake
In case anyone is interested. this may have been put up before but I didn't see it.



http://www.pro-football-reference.com/coaches/GreeDe0.htm

So, in ten years, Green's defenses were in the top half of the league five times, twice in the top ten. By comparison, the entire time the Cards have been in Arizona, 16 years now, they've been in the top half of the league only twice! That was in 93 with Bugel and 94 with Ryan.

Everyone knows Green's reputation for offense, but I had no idea how much better his defenses did than what we're used to here.

So, here's to you Lakin, without you inspiring duckjake to post these stats, I would have been a lot less hopeful about our defense!


:cheers:
 

RLakin

All Star
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
572
Reaction score
0
Location
North Glendale
Originally posted by NickelBack
...and?!?

What does one have to do with the other? Should the fact that his father farmed that land somehow disqualify him to coach here? And, by the way, this is old news as there was a thread on that already.

Look, I can't read them to you too. I believe you asked for "facts or anything to back up (the) point" about the Bidwill's buisness dealings with Pendergast family. The Arizona Republic reported that the Bidwill's bought their land from the Pendergast family. Selling land = Business deal. Business deal = Business ties
Nothing more, nothing less. Anything else you read into that statement is all your own stuff, so by all means feel free to have the debate.

With yourself.
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Re: Re: Re: RLakin's Rant On Coach Green

Originally posted by RLakin
By Dan Daly
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Clancy Pendergast, brought in by Denny Green last week to be the Cardinals' defensive coordinator, has an interesting connection to the team. "He is a member of the Pendergast family," the Arizona Republic reported, "which owned the land that the Cardinals purchased for their [new] stadium, set to open in 2006."

Coincidence ?

It's always been about Real Estate. :eek:
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,516
Reaction score
5,798
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Pendergast

I heard some stupid comments about coaches/coaching but the land deal tie in to selecting a coach beats all. I think it comes down to some under paid columnist wanting to prove how smart he/she is by "uncovering" the REAL a particular coach was hired. I might have missed it but I don't remember Lakin mentioning what a good coach Dennis Green is. To say that his record in Arizona is 0-0 indicates to me that he is undefeated and for a Cardinals coach that's pretty good.
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Re: Pendergast

Originally posted by Garthshort
I heard some stupid comments about coaches/coaching but the land deal tie in to selecting a coach beats all. I think it comes down to some under paid columnist wanting to prove how smart he/she is by "uncovering" the REAL a particular coach was hired. I might have missed it but I don't remember Lakin mentioning what a good coach Dennis Green is. To say that his record in Arizona is 0-0 indicates to me that he is undefeated and for a Cardinals coach that's pretty good.

PAYBACK ! :cool:
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,516
Reaction score
5,798
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Payback

Hamburger, since when would a family(Pendergast) want a family member hired by the Cardinals? If anything payback seemed more logical if they made the Cardinals agree NOT to hire anyone from their family. Unless, they know more about the team's future than any of us poor folks.
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Re: Payback

Originally posted by Garthshort
Hamburger, since when would a family(Pendergast) want a family member hired by the Cardinals? If anything payback seemed more logical if they made the Cardinals agree NOT to hire anyone from their family. Unless, they know more about the team's future than any of us poor folks.

Lemme put together a nice conspiracy theory. Now I haven't had much time to work on this one.:rolleyes:

Pendergast was about to get fired by Butchie Davis, when Davis was told to reorganize his staff or get replaced himself. Clancy needed a job closer to home, since his 1st 7 years were in Dallas and he didn't like the Cleveland Mistake on the Lake weather. So Clancy calls up his Uncle Penny and says don't sell the land to the NFL unless I get a job. Now Uncle Penny is in bed with Paul Taggs and the NFL Real Estate Commission and says no biggie. Taggs and the possee say "we are forcing the Bidwills to hire Green in exchange for getting them this new land for a taxpayer gifted stadium and a permanent slot in the Super Bowl rotation which will keep the local politburo warm & cozy. So what is your nephews name?

Kind of like that. :cheers: :doi: :whip: :self:

I love my conspiracy theory. Har Har !
 
Last edited:

cardsunsfan

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 25, 2003
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
162
Location
Arizona
I think the point is, RLakin, that bringing up Pandergast just sounds like you are grasping at straws. Your article was negative and it looked like you were drudging up as much bad stuff as you could and not finding enough so you embelished what you found out to prove your point. I'm pretty sure you brought up Pendergast to throw more fuel on the fire and make your point look like it had more substance...

The problem with your article is that it wasn't balanced whatsoever, only negative view points overall except out of the blue calling Green a good coach that would lose in Arizona after ripping on Green through the whole article. I think compaing Ryan to Green is a massive stretch. The only comparisons I think can be made is both were hired by the Cardinals and both have had quite a bit of power in the past.

The only link I think you have that speaks poorly of Green is Solomon. If you want to write a specific article on that, fine, but you were all over the place in this article and most of your points seemed to do nothing to validate your point.
 

NickelBack

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Posts
3,640
Reaction score
1
Originally posted by RLakin

Anything else you read into that statement is all your own stuff, so by all means feel free to have the debate.

With yourself.


Thought so Roc Lakin. Didn't think you'd have the stones to stand in and back it up.

What would Ron Wolfley say?
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
39,338
Reaction score
27,263
Re: Re: RLakin's Rant On Coach Green

Originally posted by NickelBack
Thought so Roc Lakin. Didn't think you'd have the stones to stand in and back it up.

What would Ron Wolfley say?

I also can't help but notice he's been too chicken to say who he would've hired as coach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top