Green’s impact goes beyond boxscore. He’s their most versatile defender and leads them in assists and rebounds. He can also handle the ball and make open 3’s. He will get in Ayton’s head and not sign a jersey for him after the game.
We’ll see
Green’s impact goes beyond boxscore. He’s their most versatile defender and leads them in assists and rebounds. He can also handle the ball and make open 3’s. He will get in Ayton’s head and not sign a jersey for him after the game.
His numbers stack up better than you think. For the sake of keeping this thread on topic I posted some numbers here: https://www.arizonasportsfans.com/forum/threads/the-ayton-plan.414577/post-4655405If we win multiple titles, yes.
If we don’t, no one even ever MENTIONS the HOF with him.
You can contort and cram whatever random different stats together and put a cap on the years when the stats matter to your hearts content, but there’s nothing historical about averaging 15.8 ppg/11.8 rebounds/1 block in the playoffs. That’s what he did for the course of the playoffs. It was easily his most consistent stretch of his entire career and a GREAT time to do it, but the idea he was “historical” is just laughable to me.
Did I ever bring up wilt?!?Just to help @Ouchie-Z-Clown, Wilt's Career averages regular season:
MPG: 45.8
FG%: .540
RPG: 22.9
APG: 4.4
PPG: 30.1
Wilt's Career averages post season:
MPG: 47.2
FG%: .522
RPG: 24.5
APG: 4.2
PPG: 22.5
For fun, Wilt's last year in the league when he was "washed up:"
regular season: (82 games played for the Lakers) 72.7 from the floor over 82 games, WTF?
MPG: 43.2
FG%: .727
RPG: 18.6
APG: 4.5
PPG: 13.2
playoffs (17 games):
MPG: 47.1
FG%: .552
RPG: 22.5
APG: 3.5
PPG: 10.5
Wilt wanted to make movies and play volley ball. He almost unretired to play for the Suns, but the Lakers blocked the Suns from signing Wilt because they still retained his rights. Wilt stayed retired.
You were bringing up Ayton's numbers in general were not worth the max. I just selected a Center I thought would be the max, who we could compare Ayton to. Yes, I see what you mean 15 and 11, or whatever numbers we are looking at for Ayton, just do not seem worth the max. I am thinking of Jokic averages, etc.Did I ever bring up wilt?!?
Lol I don’t think I’ve been a part of this conversation. Mixing me up with cheese?You were bringing up Ayton's numbers in general were not worth the max. I just selected a Center I thought would be the max, who we could compare Ayton to. Yes, I see what you mean 15 and 11, or whatever numbers we are looking at for Ayton, just do not seem worth the max. I am thinking of Jokic averages, etc.
Hmmm. That is interesting.Former Suns employees have been released from non-disclosure agreements for NBA investigation.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Yeah, interesting and it sounds like it should be enough to force change at the top.Hmmm. That is interesting.
Hmmm. That is interesting.
That’s kind of a huge leap in logic.Yeah, interesting and it sounds like it should be enough to force change at the top.
You're right, there was one paragraph in that article that seemed quite damning on my initial read. On a re-read I realize it could just be ESPN playing games with the truth (not lying, just misleading). I should have paid more attention to the fact that it was an ESPN article. I thought this paragraph indicated new witnesses and new claims when in fact it could easily just be referring to their initial interviews that eventually led to the investigation.That’s kind of a huge leap in logic.
You're right, there was one paragraph in that article that seemed quite damning on my initial read. On a re-read I realize it could just be ESPN playing games with the truth (not lying, just misleading). I should have paid more attention to the fact that it was an ESPN article. I thought this paragraph indicated new witnesses and new claims when in fact it could easily just be referring to their initial interviews that eventually led to the investigation.
Before their interviews, current and former employees told ESPN they had prepared extensive notes about allegations they wanted to share, dates of incidents and names of other witnesses to specific accounts. Some provided lists of current and former employees, along with their contact information, who could corroborate certain allegations.
Who did the releasing? If it was the Suns, then they think there is nothing out there too damning. If the NBA..... Sarver could be screwed.
I don’t think the nba has the power to release them. Only the contracting parties. So it would have to be the suns. Which is why my initial reaction was the same as your’s, not as bad as our imaginations can likely conjure.Who did the releasing? If it was the Suns, then they think there is nothing out there too damning. If the NBA..... Sarver could be screwed.
That’s an interesting thought.The Suns are releasing former employees from non-disclosure agreements for the purpose of the NBA investigation.
Of course I don't think the Suns had much choice other than cooperate with the NBA. If they didn't cooperate I'm guessing that would be a violation of their agreement with the NBA.
Another thought, the release may have come collectively from ownership.
I can wait. Not in a hurry. Get it right.The problem is, until the NBA investigation is complete, we are unlikely to hear much new information about the investigation unless another news organization like The Athletic steps up.
This guy keeps pushing.
Why would an employee be more likely to complain to a team hotline than to a league hotline? I would think the fear of team repercussions would make them less likely to report to a team hotline. Maybe the employee thinks their complaint is not serious enough to report to the league, but serious enough to ask for it to be solved internally?
This just doesn't make sense to me. I am willing to be enlightened.