- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 116,434
- Reaction score
- 56,507
I’m kind of laying low, but with the amount of experts here I should consider some advice no doubt
No problem. I have a player for any budget.
I’m kind of laying low, but with the amount of experts here I should consider some advice no doubt
I’m Robert Sarver. I can’t hide it anymore guys. I’ve been a forum member since before I owned the team. Using the Boise thing as a clever disguise of course.
Haha!Hey boss, I expect a raise. You see what I'm dealing with here?
Dude, I’d you’re gonna make an accusation, stop being a coward and just come out and accuse the person.at least one of the posts on this page rings true
You're right, he's making baseless accusations and staying safe by pretending it's shrouded in mystery. He needs to shut up about it (as he's claimed he's going to) or provide real examples that support his acccusations.Dude, I’d you’re gonna make an accusation, stop being a coward and just come out and accuse the person.
Or don’t. You look like an idiot either way.
You look like an idiot either way.
Well I'm sorry you feel that everyone is out to get you but let's be clear about a small part of this (can't address the rest as it's all over the place). I don't think there's anyone here that doesn't believe that supposed news site is a front for the Suns and Sarver. We only contest your claim that a regular poster here is in his employ. So, once again, show us actual evidence or quit accusing people. Please.despite being called an "idiot" with a "tin-foil hat" who is "outta his mind," and a lot more over the past 4 years, i sure have been consistently right about a lot of key Suns issues over that period of time:
1. that Igor needed to be replaced (others argued the team needed stability with the same coach)
2. that Booker should not be taking on double-duty as our point guard
3. that we needed the Chris Paul trade because, at the very least, he would teach Booker by example
4. early last year, that Paul and Booker needed to prioritize their mid-range game and get away from Booker ball
5. that the few flaws in Booker's game that i pointed out all season would be costly in the playoffs
i was personally insulted and "LOL-ed" about most of the above too -- by the same thought-policers
regarding my suspicions about that pro-Sarver website?
if you believe it's likely the Sarver investigation will confirm his nefarious practices,
it's no wild speculation that he would be connected to that website and a poster here
interesting that the same people feigning outrage that i would suspect someone of having a hidden agenda here,
have been accusing me of having a hidden agenda for years
despite being called an "idiot" with a "tin-foil hat" who is "outta his mind," and a lot more over the past 4 years, i sure have been consistently right about a lot of key Suns issues over that period of time:
1. that Igor needed to be replaced (others argued the team needed stability with the same coach)
2. that Booker should not be taking on double-duty as our point guard
3. that we needed the Chris Paul trade because, at the very least, he would teach Booker by example
4. early last year, that Paul and Booker needed to prioritize their mid-range game and get away from Booker ball
5. that the few flaws in Booker's game that i pointed out all season would be costly in the playoffs
i was personally insulted and "LOL-ed" about most of the above too -- by the same thought-policers
regarding my suspicions about that pro-Sarver website?
if you believe it's likely the Sarver investigation will confirm his nefarious practices,
it's no wild speculation that he would be connected to that website and a poster here
interesting that the same people feigning outrage that i would suspect someone of having a hidden agenda here,
have been accusing me of having a hidden agenda for years
But that doesn't mean RS kidnapped the Lindbergh baby, buried Jimmy Hoffa's body in cement or shot down Amelia Earhart's plane. IOW, you can be a horrible owner and still not be guilty of all the things laid at your doorstep.
despite being called an "idiot" with a "tin-foil hat" who is "outta his mind," and a lot more over the past 4 years, i sure have been consistently right about a lot of key Suns issues over that period of time:
1. that Igor needed to be replaced (others argued the team needed stability with the same coach)
2. that Booker should not be taking on double-duty as our point guard
3. that we needed the Chris Paul trade because, at the very least, he would teach Booker by example
4. early last year, that Paul and Booker needed to prioritize their mid-range game and get away from Booker ball
5. that the few flaws in Booker's game that i pointed out all season would be costly in the playoffs
i was personally insulted and "LOL-ed" about most of the above too -- by the same thought-policers
regarding my suspicions about that pro-Sarver website?
if you believe it's likely the Sarver investigation will confirm his nefarious practices,
it's no wild speculation that he would be connected to that website and a poster here
interesting that the same people feigning outrage that i would suspect someone of having a hidden agenda here,
have been accusing me of having a hidden agenda for years
I have no hidden agenda here. I’m one of the most vociferous anti-Sarver people on the board. And have been for... oh... the better part of 18 years. I also was on board with ALL of the above and was bashed for some of it as well, had my fandom questioned, blah blah blah. But I don’t hold any of that against people here. I’m also not hiding an agenda against you with innuendo. I think you’re an idiot and a coward and not afraid to say it with cryptic references and tin foil hat pictures.despite being called an "idiot" with a "tin-foil hat" who is "outta his mind," and a lot more over the past 4 years, i sure have been consistently right about a lot of key Suns issues over that period of time:
1. that Igor needed to be replaced (others argued the team needed stability with the same coach)
2. that Booker should not be taking on double-duty as our point guard
3. that we needed the Chris Paul trade because, at the very least, he would teach Booker by example
4. early last year, that Paul and Booker needed to prioritize their mid-range game and get away from Booker ball
5. that the few flaws in Booker's game that i pointed out all season would be costly in the playoffs
i was personally insulted and "LOL-ed" about most of the above too -- by the same thought-policers
regarding my suspicions about that pro-Sarver website?
if you believe it's likely the Sarver investigation will confirm his nefarious practices,
it's no wild speculation that he would be connected to that website and a poster here
interesting that the same people feigning outrage that i would suspect someone of having a hidden agenda here,
have been accusing me of having a hidden agenda for years
You came on the board and accused a long time member of being a rat... and then complain about bullying?i really would be crazy to keep coming back here if i'm "seeking validation and praise from strangers on the internet" considering i've never gotten that here. at best, someone occasionally agrees with something i say but mostly, i'm the recipient of the ire of a Suns homer (or employee?) who is just plain mean
i do like to occasionally pat myself on the back and take satisfaction in prognosticating correctly
fyi, i hail from ny city and enjoy listening to hyper-opinionated, critiquing broadcasters like Stephen A Smith even though i think he's full of it and himself half the time (but still not as bad as Barkley)
i've never felt welcomed here because of my brutally honest takes, but sharing opinions about what i just spent almost 3 hours watching is part of the sport for me -- regardless of who reads or cares.
i do confess that i really get pissed when someone tries to bully me into silence with insults. and when i see it happen to someone else.
1. IgorLike... 0 of your 5 points were heavily argued against, especially Booker shouldn't be playing point and the Paul trade, very few people were against either of those things.
You came on the board and accused a long time member of being a rat... and then complain about bullying?
Lol.
someone posted a clip of Jack Nicholson mimicking a rat but i never called anyone that or pointed a finger at anyone specifically because that is simply not the right thing to do.
and if calling me an "idiot" 3 times and a "coward" twice in one night is not bullying and a violation of this forum's "Personal Attack" rules, i don't know what is.
1. Igor
2. Booker overexerting himself at the point (like Harden)
5. Booker's flaws
all sparked intense disagreements and personal attacks
that's a fact you can look up, and others could verify but won't because there are cliques here
oh, stop your hyperventilating
i don't know why you're getting involved in this?
If you’re going to keep polluting the board while not having the courage to stand behind your convictions and continue calling someone here a “rat”, what else could you be called but an idiot or coward? They’re the perfect words to describe you under those circumstances.someone posted a clip of Jack Nicholson mimicking a rat but i never called anyone that or pointed a finger at anyone specifically because that is simply not the right thing to do.
and if calling me an "idiot" 3 times and a "coward" twice in one night is not bullying and a violation of this forum's "Personal Attack" rules, i don't know what is.
oh, stop your hyperventilating
i don't know why you're getting involved in this?