Roughing the passer on Matt? No Call?

nashman

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 3, 2007
Posts
10,617
Reaction score
7,408
Location
Queen Creek, AZ
Ok!! Thought you were saying we get the calls. I would say watch the game again and watch Q and Fitz all night, then tell me how their was not one illegal contact or PI call all night long. They were body and hand checking them all of the field with no calls and Q and Fitz were visably pissed about it a few different times.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,214
Reaction score
11,795
Ok!! Thought you were saying we get the calls. I would say watch the game again and watch Q and Fitz all night, then tell me how their was not one illegal contact or PI call all night long. They were body and hand checking them all of the field with no calls and Q and Fitz were visably pissed about it a few different times.

I agree that they were physical, and they should be. You want to be as close to our receivers as possible. Neither Fitz or Boldin are great route runners, and they don't have break away speed. The SF secondary played a hell of a game, one of the best that I can remember in the past few years.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,242
Reaction score
6,108
Location
Dallas, TX
What about the illegal push on Fitz on the deep seam route. Clearly a PI. Ditka said it, Golic laughed it off. That could have been a big completion.
 

nidan

Oscar
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
24,419
Reaction score
1,850
Location
Plymouth, UK
Come on guys, we all know that the refs are looking to call [or no call] against us.

Until we win, they don't give a damn about us
 

Linderbee

Let's GO, CARDINALS!
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2005
Posts
29,146
Reaction score
2,654
Location
MESA! :thud:
No, it is poor worded on my part. The Cards almost always get the short end of the referee stick. It just wasn't this night.

You can be biased positively and negatively btw.
yes, but then you shoulda said "biased against the Cards" instead of "towards the Cards" (implying positive)

;)
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
547,493
Posts
5,351,649
Members
6,304
Latest member
Dbacks05
Top