xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Sam Bradford A Cardinal
- Thread starter Sun Devil Mania
- Start date
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I don't get this. Sounds a lot like sour grapes to me.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 90,246
- Reaction score
- 65,402
seems like the truth to me. I wonder if there's ever been a QB who's been this much in his career yet never even played in ONE playoff game or QB'd a team to one season over .500.
LoyaltyisaCurse
IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
I want his agent...
GatorAZ
feed hopkins
It sounds like people resent him for making all that money when they should really be calling out the teams who keep paying him. Is Bradford supposed to decline contract after contract?
LoyaltyisaCurse
IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
No, I just want his agent.
LoyaltyisaCurse
IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
This pic says it all for me:
You must be registered for see images attach
ProdigalSun
Hall of Famer
Dude should be in jail for all the con jobs he has been able to pull on multiple teams now...
Chopper0080
2021 - Prove It
If you are stupid enough to pay him then this is what you get. In fairness to Bradford, other than his inaccuracy, this is exactly who he has always been. If you are stupid enough to not believe what he has shown you, that makes you the sucker.
GatorAZ
feed hopkins
Why? You’re worth what ******* teams will pay you.
Phrazbit
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Posts
- 20,070
- Reaction score
- 11,074
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
Yup, sums it up well.
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
Sounds like the truth. Powers and Weddle aren’t “sour grapes” kinda guys, their guys who spit out facts.
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
Exactly.
Either one of those players would have done the exact same thing.
They are making fun of Bradford being paid. They would have done the exact same thing. Hence ''sour grapes''.
Who could've known that Sammy Checkdown would suck so much? Never liked him, but thought it was a prudent move bringing in a veteran bridge QB with loads of starting experience. Nobody expected a world beater, but someone who would at least move the offense until his knee lets him down at some point in the season and Rosen is more ready to take over.
But what we've got in Bradford is nothing short of abysmal. He is playing with zero confidence. Our OL is the least of our issues. Actually I think they play very solid. Put Palmer behind this OL, and he would step up in the pocket and deliver. Teams have seen that Bradford won't push the ball downfield, so will continue stacking the box against the run, bring some extra pressure against the pass and just wait to jump all over Bradford's short dumpoffs.
I'm also not McCoy's biggest fan, but I think the blame is more on Bradford than him. It's not like all we do is running short patterns in the passing game. Just watch some All-22 film. There is just one short option, which is the designated checkdown. Unfortunately, Bradford immediately turns to the checkdown. Fitz and another WR or TE are running intermediate to deep routes, but get no looks. Bradford isn't willing to step up in the pocket and deliver. WR seperation looks okay to me. We've faced a lot of zone and if Bradford would step up, there would be holes to exploit further than 10 yards down the field. Granted, the Rams DL is elite. But it's not like there wasn't a pocket to step into. Redskins have an average DL at best, but the issue was the same with Bradford.
Honestly, I don't think Rosen could do any worse. He has a good feel in the pocket and would step up to make throws that travel further than 10 yards. This would unlock DJ in the run game and underneath passing game. DJ must be our focal point and as long as Bradford is afraid to step up and challenge defenses, DJ has no room to work with. Our OL isn't elite but certainly adequate. Our receivers aren't proven outside of Fitz, but Bradford makes them look worse than they are, throwing behind and not willing to throw the ball further than 4 yards. Again, the protection isn't bad at all.
After watching the Bears last night and last week, I think they will eat Bradford alive. Especially if he keeps playing afraid and backing off his spot. Hence Wilks knows that Bradford's days are numbered and will let it play out. The Rosen era will start soon.
But what we've got in Bradford is nothing short of abysmal. He is playing with zero confidence. Our OL is the least of our issues. Actually I think they play very solid. Put Palmer behind this OL, and he would step up in the pocket and deliver. Teams have seen that Bradford won't push the ball downfield, so will continue stacking the box against the run, bring some extra pressure against the pass and just wait to jump all over Bradford's short dumpoffs.
I'm also not McCoy's biggest fan, but I think the blame is more on Bradford than him. It's not like all we do is running short patterns in the passing game. Just watch some All-22 film. There is just one short option, which is the designated checkdown. Unfortunately, Bradford immediately turns to the checkdown. Fitz and another WR or TE are running intermediate to deep routes, but get no looks. Bradford isn't willing to step up in the pocket and deliver. WR seperation looks okay to me. We've faced a lot of zone and if Bradford would step up, there would be holes to exploit further than 10 yards down the field. Granted, the Rams DL is elite. But it's not like there wasn't a pocket to step into. Redskins have an average DL at best, but the issue was the same with Bradford.
Honestly, I don't think Rosen could do any worse. He has a good feel in the pocket and would step up to make throws that travel further than 10 yards. This would unlock DJ in the run game and underneath passing game. DJ must be our focal point and as long as Bradford is afraid to step up and challenge defenses, DJ has no room to work with. Our OL isn't elite but certainly adequate. Our receivers aren't proven outside of Fitz, but Bradford makes them look worse than they are, throwing behind and not willing to throw the ball further than 4 yards. Again, the protection isn't bad at all.
After watching the Bears last night and last week, I think they will eat Bradford alive. Especially if he keeps playing afraid and backing off his spot. Hence Wilks knows that Bradford's days are numbered and will let it play out. The Rosen era will start soon.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
juza76
ASFN Icon
If they start Rosen no reason to keep Bradford in the 53
moklerman
Rise from the Ashes III
Okay, not that anyone cares, but I finally figured out my Twitter problem. It was a Chrome extension called Mod Header. I don't even remember why I installed it or "if" I installed it. But, found a tip online to try and open Twitter in incognito mode and if that worked, it meant that an extension was causing the conflict. So, the next step was to turn off each extension one at a time to find the culprit. Low and behold, it worked.
You can all finally sleep at night.
You can all finally sleep at night.
moklerman
Rise from the Ashes III
It they choose to make Glennon the backup, there's no reason to keep Bradford. Which seems to be the case. I think they're just waiting for some team to get desperate and make a trade but I doubt they get any takers even if there's an injury.
DERPP!!
Similar threads
Staff online
-
ShaneComin for you! -
Chris_SandersNot Always The Best Moderator