Sando's take on defense

Sunryze88

Rookie
Joined
Dec 21, 2010
Posts
63
Reaction score
0
I think if we had younger pass rushers we would improve. We need more speed at the position. We absolutely had no pressure on the QB today which will definitely make our secondary look bad.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,277
Reaction score
29,523
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I usually like Sando but I don't get the comment it's clear it's going to get worse before it gets better? We played the whole game without our best LB Washington, and more than half the game without Lenon. We are starting 2 new CB's, both of whom figure to get better with experience. And we are starting a one armed SS who figures to get better as the season goes on and he hopefully gets healthier.

I think the defense stinks right now but they should get better. Teams that put in new systems are at a HUGE disadvantage this year with the short camp, add in playing new guys like our CB's and to say we're not going to get better seems wrong.

I think he was maybe looking down the schedule? Cam Newton lit us up at home in his first start with Daryl Washington on the field, and we didn't do much to make Rex Grossman trip over his own feet. If we don't win in Seattle next week and Tavaris Jackson completes 65% of his passes for 350 yards on us, we're looking forward to taking a 1-2 record against:

New York Giants
Minnesota Vikings (think that AD might be better than Tim Hightower? He could have 125 yards at the half!)
Pittsburgh
Baltimore
Philly
Dallas

There are some weaker offenses scattered between some of those games, but we needed to get fat and figure things out early in the season. I was hoping that we could win shootouts while the D figures its stuff out, but that doesn't seem to be happening.

Maybe the defense makes a quantum leap between yesterday and after the bye, but the offenses and defenses around the league are going to improve, and they might improve more quickly against us as tape of Kolb in our offense comes out (I think this is another reason why passing numbers are so high right now--not only are systems changing but we're seeing new QBs in those systems--call it the Caleb Haenie effect).
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,340
Reaction score
38,451
I think he was maybe looking down the schedule? Cam Newton lit us up at home in his first start with Daryl Washington on the field, and we didn't do much to make Rex Grossman trip over his own feet. If we don't win in Seattle next week and Tavaris Jackson completes 65% of his passes for 350 yards on us, we're looking forward to taking a 1-2 record against:

New York Giants
Minnesota Vikings (think that AD might be better than Tim Hightower? He could have 125 yards at the half!)
Pittsburgh
Baltimore
Philly
Dallas

There are some weaker offenses scattered between some of those games, but we needed to get fat and figure things out early in the season. I was hoping that we could win shootouts while the D figures its stuff out, but that doesn't seem to be happening.

Maybe the defense makes a quantum leap between yesterday and after the bye, but the offenses and defenses around the league are going to improve, and they might improve more quickly against us as tape of Kolb in our offense comes out (I think this is another reason why passing numbers are so high right now--not only are systems changing but we're seeing new QBs in those systems--call it the Caleb Haenie effect).


THe Giants offense seems to be hit or miss, when everyone says they're good they aren't, and vice versa. Minnesota so far can't throw the ball and hopefully we'll have Washington and Lenon when we play them so the run D will be better.

Obviously the other teams are better my point is it's a brand new DC and scheme, and a bunch of new players, and guys out or playing hurt. To say it's not going to get better is very pessimistic.

The opponents may get better too sure, but the D itself is going to get better.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
I feared this would be the worst cardinals defense we've ever seen and thus far, I've seen nothing to change my mind unfortunately.

thank GOD we don't face Brady, Rivers, Rodgers or Brees this year. Those guys would set passing records on us.

Worse than the David Barrett, McKinnon, Levar Woods, Raynoch Thompson, etc., etc. ?

Wow. That is an accomplishment.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,087
Reaction score
67,753
Worse than the David Barrett, McKinnon, Levar Woods, Raynoch Thompson, etc., etc. ?

Wow. That is an accomplishment.

by the end of the year, i fear we'll get there. remember, we haven't exactly been playing offensive juggernauts so far (and luckily DON'T for the most part).
 

Dayman

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Posts
6,077
Reaction score
7,769
Location
Portland, Oregon
While the personnel on the D has too many obvious flaws, keeping them on the field for so long certainly isn't helping. Our offense is 31st in TOP, which is a death sentence for a D that's a strange combination of too old and too inexperienced.
 

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
While the personnel on the D has too many obvious flaws, keeping them on the field for so long certainly isn't helping. Our offense is 31st in TOP, which is a death sentence for a D that's a strange combination of too old and too inexperienced.

The only reason for our TOP is the inability of our defense to stop the other team. The offense has had very few 3 and outs.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,277
Reaction score
29,523
Location
Gilbert, AZ
The only reason for our TOP is the inability of our defense to stop the other team. The offense has had very few 3 and outs.

Maybe not three-and-outs, but we have very few sustained drives, either:

Arizona Cardinals at 10:04
1-10-ARI 19 (10:04) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass short middle to 11-L.Fitzgerald to ARI 33 for 14 yards (20-O.Atogwe; 59-L.Fletcher).

1-10-ARI 33 (9:27) 26-C.Wells left tackle to ARI 35 for 2 yards (59-L.Fletcher; 37-R.Doughty).

2-8-ARI 35 (8:51) 4-K.Kolb pass incomplete short right to 11-L.Fitzgerald.

3-8-ARI 35 (8:44) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass incomplete short middle to 85-E.Doucet.

4-8-ARI 35 (8:40) 9-D.Zastudil punts 51 yards to WAS 14, Center-82-M.Leach. 16-B.Banks to WAS 19 for 5 yards (27-M.Adams).

Arizona Cardinals at 04:32
1-10-WAS 37 (4:32) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass short right to 12-A.Roberts pushed ob at WAS 21 for 16 yards (22-K.Barnes).

1-10-WAS 21 (4:02) 4-K.Kolb pass short left to 87-J.King for 21 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

WATCH HIGHLIGHT
3-J.Feely extra point is GOOD, Center-82-M.Leach, Holder-9-D.Zastudil.
ARI 7 WAS 0 Plays: 2 Possession: 0:38

1-10-ARI 29 (2:52) 26-C.Wells left tackle to ARI 30 for 1 yard (91-R.Kerrigan).

2-9-ARI 30 (2:52) (Shotgun) PENALTY on ARI-75-L.Brown, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at ARI 30 - No Play.

Two-Minute Warning
2-14-ARI 25 (2:00) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass incomplete short right to 17-C.Stuckey.

3-14-ARI 25 (1:55) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass incomplete short middle to 26-C.Wells.

4-14-ARI 25 (1:51) 9-D.Zastudil punts 45 yards to WAS 30, Center-82-M.Leach. 16-B.Banks to ARI 35 for 35 yards (87-J.King). PENALTY on ARI-87-J.King, Face Mask (15 Yards), 15 yards

1-10-ARI 23 :)34) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass incomplete short middle to 26-C.Wells (52-R.McIntosh).

Timeout #1 by ARI at 00:29.
2-10-ARI 23 :)29) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb sacked at ARI 19 for -4 yards (91-R.Kerrigan).

WATCH HIGHLIGHT
Timeout #2 by WAS at 00:22.
3-14-ARI 19 :)22) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass short right to 12-A.Roberts to ARI 25 for 6 yards (26-J.Wilson).

Timeout #3 by WAS at 00:15.
4-8-ARI 25 :)15) 9-D.Zastudil punts 53 yards to WAS 22, Center-82-M.Leach. 16-B.Banks to WAS 29 for 7 yards (23-H.Abdullah).

You have that right. The Cards got the ball with 00:38 left on the clock in the 1st half and couldn't stay on the field and had to punt.

1-10-ARI 7 (1:33) (Shotgun) 26-C.Wells left end to ARI 18 for 11 yards (20-O.Atogwe).

1-10-ARI 18 :)52) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass incomplete short right to 85-E.Doucet (96-B.Cofield).

2-10-ARI 18 :)47) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass incomplete short right to 12-A.Roberts [59-L.Fletcher]. PENALTY on ARI-4-K.Kolb, Intentional Grounding, 15 yards, enforced at ARI 18.

3-25-ARI 3 :)40) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass short middle to 85-E.Doucet to ARI 17 for 14 yards (59-L.Fletcher; 34-B.Westbrook).

4-11-ARI 17 :)03) 9-D.Zastudil punts 53 yards to WAS 30, Center-82-M.Leach. 16-B.Banks pushed ob at ARI 44 for 26 yards (49-R.Johnson).

4-G.Gano kicks 65 yards from WAS 35 to ARI 0. 20-A.Jefferson to ARI 32 for 32 yards (50-R.Jackson, 13-A.Armstrong).
1-10-ARI 32 (11:09) (Shotgun) PENALTY on ARI-26-C.Wells, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at ARI 32 - No Play.

1-15-ARI 27 (11:09) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass deep right to 11-L.Fitzgerald for 73 yards, TOUCHDOWN [59-L.Fletcher].

WATCH HIGHLIGHT
3-J.Feely extra point is GOOD, Center-82-M.Leach, Holder-9-D.Zastudil.
ARI 21 WAS 13 Plays: 1 Possession: 0:20

1-10-ARI 20 (5:17) 26-C.Wells right guard to ARI 23 for 3 yards (52-R.McIntosh).

2-7-ARI 23 (4:35) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass incomplete short right to 85-E.Doucet. Penalty on ARI-86-T.Heap, Illegal Motion, declined.

3-7-ARI 23 (4:32) (Shotgun) 4-K.Kolb pass incomplete short right to 85-E.Doucet (91-R.Kerrigan).

4-7-ARI 23 (4:28) 9-D.Zastudil punts 41 yards to WAS 36, Center-82-M.Leach, downed by ARI. WAS-24-D.Gomes was injured during the play.
 

Jasper

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 16, 2002
Posts
2,886
Reaction score
1,335
Location
Surrounded by Rams and Chargers
While the personnel on the D has too many obvious flaws, keeping them on the field for so long certainly isn't helping. Our offense is 31st in TOP, which is a death sentence for a D that's a strange combination of too old and too inexperienced.

That is really weird, I never really thought of that. Usually its nice to have a mix of veterans and rookies.
 

Capital Card

The Kobayashi of Kool-Aid
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
3,132
Reaction score
289
Location
Pigskin Slaughter House-Smithfield, VA
Although it injects even more inexperience into the defense, I'm hoping that Acho and Schofield will begin to significantly take plays away from Haggans and Porter.

Personally, Id gradually increase their playing time each week and then have them start following the bye week.

Go Cards!!!
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
I haven't watched the game yet so take this for what's it's worth but just looking at the stat line we had 15 rushing attempts for 93 yards, 14 of which were Beanie, that's 6.64 yards a carry.

It's idiotic that we only had 15 attempts, unfathomable, with a lead in the 4th.

The crucial decision IMO was the decision after Beanie got 3 yards on 1st down with about 5 minutes to go we tried a pass then another pass both incomplete.

That's where you let you running back have three cracks at making first downs for you, right there.

It's a very small point, fairly well lost in the game but the guy is averaging 6 yards a carry up until then, RUN HIM.

Just because he didn't get the first down there, two more tries are in order IMO.

Instead we passed the ball saved time on the clock then punted the ball back to them so that they could score on our defense.

We should of run more in the game but right there is what killed us IMO.
 

Jasper

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 16, 2002
Posts
2,886
Reaction score
1,335
Location
Surrounded by Rams and Chargers
I haven't watched the game yet so take this for what's it's worth but just looking at the stat line we had 15 rushing attempts for 93 yards, 14 of which were Beanie, that's 6.64 yards a carry.

It's idiotic that we only had 15 attempts, unfathomable, with a lead in the 4th.

The crucial decision IMO was the decision after Beanie got 3 yards on 1st down with about 5 minutes to go we tried a pass then another pass both incomplete.

That's where you let you running back have three cracks at making first downs for you, right there.

It's a very small point, fairly well lost in the game but the guy is averaging 6 yards a carry up until then, RUN HIM.

Just because he didn't get the first down there, two more tries are in order IMO.

Instead we passed the ball saved time on the clock then punted the ball back to them so that they could score on our defense.

We should of run more in the game but right there is what killed us IMO.

That second down play was a head scratcher. Which lead to a tough 3rd down which lead to a weak punt.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,277
Reaction score
29,523
Location
Gilbert, AZ
We got the ball with :38 seconds left in the 1st half and still had to punt. We couldn't run :38 seconds off the clock. :bang:
 

BigRedArk

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 19, 2003
Posts
2,718
Reaction score
234
Location
Norh Little Rock, Arkansas
Do we have enough DL to go to the 4-3 instead of the 3-4 D we are in now? Or say more of a hybrid like we did under Pendy perhaps?

Not saying we will but just wondering if we had a mind to do we have the depth at DL to make the switch?

Also how long does it take Horton to throw in the towel and go with Schofield at ROLB? If he did would we be any worse off than Porter? Is Scho ready to start yet?
 
OP
OP
A

az1965

Love Games!
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Posts
14,760
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin, TX
The only reason for our TOP is the inability of our defense to stop the other team. The offense has had very few 3 and outs.
Mix that with one or two offense series with quick long scoring throws (70 yards to Doucett, 73 yards to Fitz, 48 yards to King...which is good) so the offense is off the field quicker and sucking defense is back on the field.
 
OP
OP
A

az1965

Love Games!
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Posts
14,760
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin, TX
Do we have enough DL to go to the 4-3 instead of the 3-4 D we are in now? Or say more of a hybrid like we did under Pendy perhaps?

Not saying we will but just wondering if we had a mind to do we have the depth at DL to make the switch?

Also how long does it take Horton to throw in the towel and go with Schofield at ROLB? If he did would we be any worse off than Porter? Is Scho ready to start yet?
We will NOT be going to 4-3.

Right now anyone on team will be better than Porter who is a total waste of a roster spot let alone starting.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
We will NOT be going to 4-3.

Right now anyone on team will be better than Porter who is a total waste of a roster spot let alone starting.

Funny though that they are playing a 4-2.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,621
Reaction score
23,534
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Do we have enough DL to go to the 4-3 instead of the 3-4 D we are in now? Or say more of a hybrid like we did under Pendy perhaps?

Not saying we will but just wondering if we had a mind to do we have the depth at DL to make the switch?

Also how long does it take Horton to throw in the towel and go with Schofield at ROLB? If he did would we be any worse off than Porter? Is Scho ready to start yet?

No, nor do we have the LBers to run the 4-3.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,277
Reaction score
29,523
Location
Gilbert, AZ
No, nor do we have the LBers to run the 4-3.

Sure we do. We could play Washington at WLB, Lenon at MLB, and Haggans at SLB (or Bradley where he was playing after an undrafted rookie (IIRC) took his job last year).

The problem is that we don't have a rush end anymore than we have a rush linebacker.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
I know there's a new scheme, but should the tackle list really look like this?

Code:
Arizona                TK    AST   COM    
K.Rhodes                7        1        8    
P.Peterson                5        3        8    
S.Bradley                5        2        7    
R.Walker                4        3        7    
P.Lenon                4        2        6    
J.Porter                4        1        5    
A.Jefferson        3        2        5    
C.Haggans                3        1        4    
A.Wilson                3        1        4    
O.Schofield        2        1        3    
R.Marshall                2        1        3    
D.Dockett                2        0        2    
V.Holliday                1        1        2    
R.Johnson                1        0        1    
D.Carter                1        0        1    
C.Campbell        1        3        4

minus rhodes and peterson, yes!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
551,480
Posts
5,387,310
Members
6,310
Latest member
sundevils78
Top