Scenario: Patriots offer 2 first round picks for Larry Fitzgerald

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
I'm down with that. Trade the #5 instead of Fitzgerald. It's a higher percentage play.

Think we could get Kolb and the #23 from Philly for it? How about the #28, #33 and Hernandez?

Given our track record Orton and the #36 and #46 from Denver would be even better. Denver could then get two top defensive players they need and we get:

Orton,Dereck Sherrod,Kyle Rudolph, and Sam Acho.

That wouldn't be a bad deal. Maybe replace Rudolph with Nate Irving and Acho with Reed and you have a deal. ;) Rudolph has some injury concerns already.

http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20110126/BLOGS02/110129603
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
I'm down with that. Trade the #5 instead of Fitzgerald. It's a higher percentage play.

Think we could get Kolb and the #23 from Philly for it? How about the #28, #33 and Hernandez?

Given our track record Orton and the #36 and #46 from Denver would be even better. Denver could then get two top defensive players they need and we get:

Orton,Dereck Sherrod,Kyle Rudolph, and Sam Acho.

That'd be an interesting trade. Personally, I like Orton better than any other options so far, and with 3 high second round picks we'd have flexibility. If there's a mid to late 1st type that we are targeting, we could move up and still have chips left.
 

Doc Cardinal

Old Fart
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Posts
1,807
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
That'd be an interesting trade. Personally, I like Orton better than any other options so far, and with 3 high second round picks we'd have flexibility. If there's a mid to late 1st type that we are targeting, we could move up and still have chips left.

Orton's not going anywhere.
 

ARodg

All Star
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Posts
599
Reaction score
0
Holy crap are the Pats going to destroy the next few years in the draft.

Their only real needs are Safety, OLB, and a #1 WR.

#17: Houston

#28: Phil Taylor (Wilfork is getting up there)

#33: Jonathon Baldwin

#58: Duenta Williams

#73: Marcus Gilbert

#92: Jeremy Beal

Holy ****
 

IQFBdotcom

Newbie
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Posts
5
Reaction score
0
I wouldn't do it, the Patriots are always good and that means the picks would be the 25th to 32nd selections in the first round... maybe if a bad team wanted to do it.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Bird in hand is worth two in the bush (and a TE).

I'll stick with FITZ and invest in a QBOF.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Done. Sorry Larry, we are rebuilding.

Losing both Fitz and Breaston would be pure dumb. We seem to have this ability to lose our best players while their careers are peaking. Only a few years ago we had the best group of receivers in the NFL. Now we could end up with the worst group of receivers. How many NFL starters around the league are there that were once Cards? I think we could put a team together that could beat the present Cards from this group. Graves you are an idiot or need some sort of help. My choice for GM as far as drafting and trading players would be Kurt Warner. He would not be catering to Mr. Bidwill so that want happen. Someone tell me just who in the NFL would hire Rod Graves as the GM if he left us? Then tell me why. People want to know.
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,512
Reaction score
4,470
I'd say no. But if you hit right with 2 first's, you could get two studs.

That said, like my mom's favorite commercial. A bird in the hand IS worth two in the bush.

In this case that bird is Larry Fitzgerald.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Didn't we used to have a Bird named Bush?

TE I think.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,270
Reaction score
6,199
Location
Dallas, TX
I'd say no. But if you hit right with 2 first's, you could get two studs.

That said, like my mom's favorite commercial. A bird in the hand IS worth two in the bush.

In this case that bird is Larry Fitzgerald.

Could have 2 studs...

It just seems to me the team that traded the star player almost never gets the value of that player back. It's a risky game that management has put themeselves in becuase the guy can walk after the season & that seems to be an ongoing philosphy. :bang:
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,512
Reaction score
4,470
Could have 2 studs...

It just seems to me the team that traded the star player almost never gets the value of that player back. It's a risky game that management has put themeselves in becuase the guy can walk after the season & that seems to be an ongoing philosphy. :bang:

Yes, I'm in favor of LF staying, though I see the misunderstanding. (I meant the 'bird in the hand', is worth keeping over the potential of '2 in the bush')
 

Gee!

BirdGang
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
26,222
Reaction score
25
Location
Gee From The G
You dont let Fitz go for one reason only.. He attracts other players that want to play here.. So its a no branier to keep Fitz at all costs..
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,270
Reaction score
6,199
Location
Dallas, TX
You dont let Fitz go for one reason only.. He attracts other players that want to play here.. So its a no branier to keep Fitz at all costs..

So did Anquan Boldin...

Again management has painted itself into a sticky situation with the no tag clause in his contract & the distinct possibility he doesn't sign an extension because of the QB situation. If #11 does indeed decide before or sometime during the season he's not resigning, I can easily see the team unloading him to the highest bidder before the trade deadline. :bang:
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
So did Anquan Boldin...

Again management has painted itself into a sticky situation with the no tag clause in his contract & the distinct possibility he doesn't sign an extension because of the QB situation. If #11 does indeed decide before or sometime during the season he's not resigning, I can easily see the team unloading him to the highest bidder before the trade deadline. :bang:

Head banging = concussion
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
34,929
Reaction score
21,023
Location
South Bay
So did Anquan Boldin...

Again management has painted itself into a sticky situation with the no tag clause in his contract & the distinct possibility he doesn't sign an extension because of the QB situation. If #11 does indeed decide before or sometime during the season he's not resigning, I can easily see the team unloading him to the highest bidder before the trade deadline. :bang:

Fitz could have raped us for $16 mil that season knowing full well he would have cashed in the following season in free agency. He was generous enough to help us with cap relief so we could at least sign a couple of free agents. Of course, the pool for quality guys was shallow. With that said, Im sure that was one of the concessions that was made to get him to lower that cap number was the "no tag/no trade clause"

In a sense, I can understand why that was installed in the contract, but on the other hand, it has reared its ugly head.

Simple solution is to back up the Brinks truck to his house (without damaging his new blue Shelby Cobra in the process :D)

As for Q, he wanted Fitz type money and it just wasnt going to happen. Paying two receivers $10+ mil a year would have been ridiculous. It's hard to fault the guy for asking, but it simply was not going to happen. In addition to which, he has himself and Rosenhaus to blame as they were the ones who agreed to that 5-year contract early on.
 
Last edited:

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
68,946
Reaction score
38,725
Location
Las Vegas
As for Q, he wanted Fitz type money and it just wasnt going to happen. Paying two receivers $10+ mil a year would have been ridiculous. It's hard to fault the guy for asking, but it simply was not going to happen. In addition to which, he has himself and Rosenhaus to blame as they were the ones who agreed to that 5-year contract early on.

NONESENSE! Nowhere can anyone show or prove that he was looking for a Fitz type deal. His contract he signed in Baltimore wasn't near a Fitz type deal either.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
34,929
Reaction score
21,023
Location
South Bay
NONESENSE! Nowhere can anyone show or prove that he was looking for a Fitz type deal. His contract he signed in Baltimore wasn't near a Fitz type deal either.

I guess the local media was wrong then. Multiple outlets reported when Fitz signed his deal in 2008, Q wanted the same.

2 years later is when he was traded. He turned 29, proved to be more injury prone than before and had little control of where he was going to be traded. Those are the reasons he didnt get anywhere near Fitz money when he ended up in Baltimore. Very little leverage
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,895
Posts
5,403,654
Members
6,315
Latest member
SewingChick65
Top