SCHATZ: James a failure in Arizona

AzWins23

Registered User
Joined
Aug 25, 2002
Posts
2,031
Reaction score
0
Location
Parma,Ohio
Edgerrin James and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day
Oct 17, 2006 | 9:34AM
| report this I think we can all agree that last night's Arizona-Chicago game was one of the most shocking games in NFL history. Shocking in how Arizona dominated the first three quarters, and shocking in the way they choked at the end.

How on earth did the Cardinals manage to blow their 23-3 lead? Sure, kicker Neil Rackers deserves some blame for missing the game-ending field goal, and everyone on the Arizona punt coverage team is wearing goat horns today. But the biggest culprits in this loss were running back Edgerrin James, the offensive linemen who couldn't block for him, and the coaches who kept calling his number.

Yes, normally it is a good idea to run out the clock with a lead, rather than stop the clock with incomplete passes or worse, risk an interception. But not every general statement applies to every specific situation. The Cardinals have not been able to run the ball against anyone this year, let alone the Bears. (When asked why he suddenly started dominating, Brian Urlacher told reporters “First of all, they weren’t blocking me.”) Matt Leinart, meanwhile, was killing the Chicago zone coverage in the first half. Every single play he'd find some guy open and ping, first down.

The offensive strategy against the Bears seems pretty clear now: keep in multiple tight ends and/or running backs for max protect against the Chicago pass rush, and send the rest of your guys out to go find the holes in the Cover 2. Leinart was running a lot of quick drop-and-throws, play-action rollouts, and shotgun formation, plays designed to compensate for the fact that Arizona's offensive line is awful.

But in the second half, the Cardinals shied away from using their hot quarterback. They started running on every first or second down -- and since the running game was completely impotent, Leinart was always stuck in third-and-long. No quarterback can consistently convert third-and-long over and over, let alone a rookie with one NFL start under his belt and his best receiver sitting on the sidelines in street clothes.


James gained a grand total of 55 yards on 36 carries. No player in NFL history has rushed for fewer yards on that many carries. Looking at the play-by-play shows you how futile the Arizona running game was. Nine times, Edge lost yardage on a run. Five times he was stopped at the line of scrimmage for zero yards, and six times he gained just one yard. It's hard to tell how much of this is Edge's fault, and how much is the offensive line. But Edge's calling card is supposed to be his ability to push forward for extra yardage. Did anybody ever notice him actually doing that during the second half of last night's game? I sure didn't see it.

If you read the weekly Quick Reads column, you know our DPAR (Defense-adjusted Value Over Average) stats. Edge's runs were worth -7.8 PAR; since Arizona has actually played good run defense against other teams too, that gets bumped up to -6.9 DPAR. That's pretty horrible, but believe it or not, when it comes to our Football Outsiders stats, this is not the worst rushing game ever.

It's hard to compare Edge's game to past years with the opponent adjustment, because we don't know how the opponent adjustments will look once both Arizona and Chicago have played a full season. But based on the non-adjusted PAR number, there have been three rushing performances since 2000 with even less value:

2001 Week 1: Stephen Davis, back when he was still with the Redskins, gained 35 yards on 14 carries with three fumbles in a 30-3 blowout loss to San Diego. FO result: -10.1 PAR, -8.2 DPAR with opponent adjustment.
2001 Week 17: Ricky Williams, in his final game with New Orleans, gained 33 yards on 11 carries with three fumbles in a 38-0 blowout loss to San Francisco. FO result: -8.7 PAR, -8.3 DPAR with opponent adjustment. By the way, Ricky also had -8 receiving yards in this game.
2003 Week 16: Deuce McAllister gained 50 yards on 21 carries in a 20-19 loss to Jacksonville. This is the famous game that ended with New Orleans returning a kickoff with a zillion laterals for a touchdown, only to have John Carney honk the extra point to end the Saints' playoff hopes. McAllister fumbled away the ball as the Saints were driving for the game-tying touchdown in the fourth quarter, and the official stats for some reason don't count a play where McAllister dropped the handoff on fourth-and-2 and lost nine yards. Only two runs went longer than four yards: one for five, one for nine. FO result: -10.1 PAR, -8.2 DPAR with opponent adjustment. If you add in receiving, though, McAllister was better than Edge was on Monday night; he caught six passes for 63 yards. James caught just one pass for seven yards.
In general, these games score lower than Edge last night because of the fumbles. Edge's fumble came at the worst possible time in the game, but he only fumbled once. Without considering fumbles, this was unquestionably the worst rushing game of the last few years.

Before the season, we wrote in Pro Football Prospectus 2006 that James would have a serious decline behind the Arizona offensive line, but we never imagined anything like this. After six games, James is averaging just 2.7 yards per carry. That's less than either Marcel Shipp (2.9) or J.J. Arrington (3.3) averaged last year.

As a team, the Cardinals now average 2.5 yards per carry. That number will climb before the end of the year, but only one team since 1978 has averaged less than 2.9 yards per carry: the 1994 New England Patriots, the team where Drew Bledsoe set the all-time record for pass attempts.

At this point, it has to be acknowledged that the signing of Edgerrin James was a dismal failure. The impotence of the Arizona offensive line has rendered him completely ineffective -- and things are only going to get worse. James is fighting the twin demons of age and overuse. Running backs generally decline after age 28, and Edge will start to lose his speed and agility. Worse, despite his horrific performance, the Cardinals have handed Edge the ball 148 times this year. That puts him on pace for 394 carries, which would be the sixth highest total in NFL history. Remember: running backs generally break down if they carry the ball 370 or more times in a season. I can't even fathom how bad Edge will be next year if the Cardinals work him for more than 370 carries this year -- and then stick him behind this line again.
 

Treesquid PhD

Pardon my Engrish
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
4,844
Reaction score
105
Location
Gilbert
only in Arizona, and it's amazing how stupid some of you are to still believe this team can recover.
 

JC_AZ

JC_AZ
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Posts
1,593
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa
Amen...EXCEPT I am not willing to give Fitz the "best receiver" title yet on this team...Q is an awesome specimen and one of the toughest competitors I have ever seen... he never quits (debatable on the INT last week, but it seemed more of shock then quit)
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
8,337
Reaction score
9,772
Location
Home of the Thunder
Pretty grim stuff. But none of it seems off base.

I never expected a dramatic improvment in our running game with edge, but I certainly didn't expect it to get worse.
 

JC_AZ

JC_AZ
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Posts
1,593
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa
only in Arizona, and it's amazing how stupid some of you are to still believe this team can recover.

Brilliant post "TREESQUID" we welcome your educated commentary to help raise us from the 'stupid' level you have given us... NOT
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,830
Reaction score
26,149
only in Arizona, and it's amazing how stupid some of you are to still believe this team can recover.

Well, with the way you pimped Koetter last year, you do know "stupid" when you see it, don't you?
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,266
Reaction score
12,290
Location
York, PA
only in Arizona, and it's amazing how stupid some of you are to still believe this team can recover.
This team beat up the supposedly best team in the NFL last night. We were a play or two away from beating the Bears 35-3. If we play even remotely as well as we did last night, we could easily finish 8-8. Call me stupid, but I called last nights game perfectly. It's a crying shame what took place, but it might serve to push this team over the top. I would not be surprised if we beat Oakland by 40 pts & then reel off 5 or 6 W's in a row. With Leinart running the show, we ARE that good.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,124
Reaction score
39,698
only in Arizona, and it's amazing how stupid some of you are to still believe this team can recover.


It's not stupidity as much as insanity to think we can keep doing the same thing and this time it will work.

But I've already convinced myself if we can beat Oakland and Green Bay on the road, get to the bye, get Fitz healthy, we have a shot at Dallas and Detroit and .500.

how insane is that?
 

Second Deck

Registered
Joined
Jul 1, 2002
Posts
938
Reaction score
0
It's not stupidity as much as insanity to think we can keep doing the same thing and this time it will work.

But I've already convinced myself if we can beat Oakland and Green Bay on the road, get to the bye, get Fitz healthy, we have a shot at Dallas and Detroit and .500.

how insane is that?

Not insane at all Russ. I think you speak for alot of us hardcore Big Red fans. This is a good team minus the oline that has to get fixed. I also think we should beat Raiders and GB with Matts leadership.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,047
Reaction score
58,936
Location
SoCal
if history holds we'll be the raiders only w this year. (see jets only w one year and the niners only two w's one year). that seems more likely to me than winning on the road coming off a 5 game losing streak.

do any of realize this??? it is a FIVE GAME LOSING STREAK!!! i don't care how we lost, that's FIVE STRAIGHT LOSSES. that means something. we suck.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,508
Reaction score
2,344
Location
ASFN
if history holds we'll be the raiders only w this year. (see jets only w one year and the niners only two w's one year). that seems more likely to me than winning on the road coming off a 5 game losing streak.

do any of realize this??? it is a FIVE GAME LOSING STREAK!!! i don't care how we lost, that's FIVE STRAIGHT LOSSES. that means something. we suck.
We do suck. But we are so close to not sucking. We are an Oline away pluss more depth.

All we can do it hope cause we dont have much else. Leinart takes this team to another level. He will give us a chance most weeks to win.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
We do suck. But we are so close to not sucking. We are an Oline away pluss more depth.

All we can do it hope cause we dont have much else. Leinart takes this team to another level. He will give us a chance most weeks to win.

Leinart and Boldin keep the games entertaining. They don't give us a chance to win anything. The Cards still suck at special teams, are worse at running the ball than ever and have probably demoralized their defense. A perfect recipe for another 4-12 season.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
556,048
Posts
5,431,296
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top