NashDishesDimes
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2008
- Posts
- 1,891
- Reaction score
- 657
Maybe I am being biass but I dont think so. Seattle is just one of those teams that the analysts just assume are good. They had struggles last year and yet all they did was lose people this offseason i.e. Okung, Carpenter, Bruce Irvin, Micheal Bennett, and others I believe as well. Their line was bad last year, and all they have done was lose the couple good pieces they have. Marshawn is gone, Rawls is out, Christine Michael is filling in admirably but they lost a lot at the RB position.
I look at their weapons and they are mediocre at best with Graham and Baldwin.
The defense seems to still be strong but i just dont know how people can sit there year over year and pick them over the Cards.
Cards went to NFC championship last year and won the division, Seattle did not. All Seattle did was lose people and they opened up the season as favorites in the division. There is no other explanation than the medias infatuation with the Sea****
See their depth chart below, doesnt scare me at all:
http://m.espn.com/nfl/depthChart?teamId=26
I look at their weapons and they are mediocre at best with Graham and Baldwin.
The defense seems to still be strong but i just dont know how people can sit there year over year and pick them over the Cards.
Cards went to NFC championship last year and won the division, Seattle did not. All Seattle did was lose people and they opened up the season as favorites in the division. There is no other explanation than the medias infatuation with the Sea****
See their depth chart below, doesnt scare me at all:
http://m.espn.com/nfl/depthChart?teamId=26
Last edited: