Seriously, who was the worst FA pickup
- Thread starter Ryanwb
- Start date
LoyaltyisaCurse
IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Ross.
bratwurst
on double secret probation
University of Phoenix. Those guys haven't won anything before. Their record sucks, and they're being sued.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 119,244
- Reaction score
- 59,850
But they pay good.
Actually part of your description of the UOP sounds like the Cardinals.
"Those guys haven't won anything before. Their record sucks..."
Maybe they're a good fit for this team.
Jetstream Green
Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
that poll is unfair
I wanted to vote for both of them
I wanted to vote for both of them
krispydude
\_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_
ross.
azsouthendzone
ASFN Addict
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2004
- Posts
- 5,620
- Reaction score
- 1,322
Edge.
RON_IN_OC
https://www.ronevansrealty.com
I voted Ross, because Starks was hurt so much and was on the sidelines...he wasn't able to "hurt" our team the way that Ross has. I wish Ross could've been put on IR this year! I'd rather have our QB getting blown up by an underpaid rookie, learning the game, instead of a high priced FA that sucks like the wind.
green machine
I rule at posting
Freddie Jones.
No way was he worse than either of the two llisted in the poll.
green machine
I rule at posting
Yes way. They are all in the same boat: high expectations, colossal failures.
No way.
His stats are pretty much on par with his entire career. he had one inflated year in SD where he had 71 catches and everyone expected him to come in here and be Tony Gonzales. He wasnt talented enough to do that and to me was unfairly ciriticized. He was what he was. a 40to 50 catch a year TE who give you a couple TD's and was a below average blocker.
He certainly wasnt the dissapointment that the SB MVP Starks was and the RT who helped anchor one of the best OL's in football.
- Joined
- May 13, 2002
- Posts
- 38,830
- Reaction score
- 26,149
I voted Starks. He took more money and was a higher rated free agent. He missed one game in four seasons for the Ravens but was an injury machine here.
CardNots
ASFN Addict
Starks by far when you figure cost per game. The most expensive free agent the Cards have ever had. What was it, a couple of games per year for three years or was that a two year contract.
Jasper
ASFN Lifer
Ross,
Starks actually gave us a few good hard working games when he wasn't injured and actually played.
Ross hasn't given us anything yet past mediocre.
Starks actually gave us a few good hard working games when he wasn't injured and actually played.
Ross hasn't given us anything yet past mediocre.
SeattleCard
Back in Arizona!!!
Denny Green
It is actually Edge. I am not saying Edge isn't a good player but, based on the rumblings before the FA signing period, the word was Denny wanted to spread the wealth around and bring in 7-8 players (of which I am assuming there would have been a couple OL at least). Whomever decided to pursue Edge (Denny or Michael B) essentially put all the eggs in one basket thinking it was the last piece. Depending on how the offseason would have gone without signing Edge may have made the whole Ross at RT thing a moot point.
Edge being here has hurt this team on the field and now he is hurting it in the lockerroom with all his ramblings.
Edge being here has hurt this team on the field and now he is hurting it in the lockerroom with all his ramblings.
BIGDADDY_REDBIRD
Registered
Resigning Reggie Wells (RFA) or matching Buffalo's offer was'nt too smart either. he has'nt blocked anyone all year.
BigDavis75
Making a Comeback
Did you watch him play in Pitt? He was clearly the worst O-Lineman there.
Ross.
PrescottLooie
Registered
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Posts
- 228
- Reaction score
- 0
I think Ross was. He has not performed. Starks, as I recall, performed. He was just injured a lot.
