- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,712
- Reaction score
- 39,026
Also a story out yesterday saying all 10 people named in the FBI case will be formally indicted next week and then will be allowed to see the evidence against them via discovery.
Not sure, but I would guess this means like in the Mueller case, those indictments will become available to the media and we'll start to see more information on which players may be involved but don't quote me on that it's just a guess.
Bowen's lawyer said the FBI cleared him and they were now working for reinstatement but it was highly misleading. All it was is the FBI , as everyone expected, had no intention of indicting an 18 year old kid for getting paid, they simply said the dad took the money, the kid said he didn't know, and they'd leave it up to the NCAA to decide about reinstating him.
Louisville hasn't commented but the general feeling is Louisville has no intention of playing Bowen this year if ever. People keep wanting to compare his case to Cam Newton's case but in Cam's case, there was only evidence the dad asked MSU for money, he committed to Auburn and there was no evidence he got money. Everyone believed he did, presumably more than MSU offered, but there was no proof. In Bowen's case there is apparently proof the dad got 100K, so it's highly unlikely the NCAA will us Newton's case as precedent for Bowen.
Not sure, but I would guess this means like in the Mueller case, those indictments will become available to the media and we'll start to see more information on which players may be involved but don't quote me on that it's just a guess.
Bowen's lawyer said the FBI cleared him and they were now working for reinstatement but it was highly misleading. All it was is the FBI , as everyone expected, had no intention of indicting an 18 year old kid for getting paid, they simply said the dad took the money, the kid said he didn't know, and they'd leave it up to the NCAA to decide about reinstating him.
Louisville hasn't commented but the general feeling is Louisville has no intention of playing Bowen this year if ever. People keep wanting to compare his case to Cam Newton's case but in Cam's case, there was only evidence the dad asked MSU for money, he committed to Auburn and there was no evidence he got money. Everyone believed he did, presumably more than MSU offered, but there was no proof. In Bowen's case there is apparently proof the dad got 100K, so it's highly unlikely the NCAA will us Newton's case as precedent for Bowen.