No, but I don't want to have to rely on a college kid playing hurt in the NFL either. Not exactly a glowing recommendation that he played well hurt in college, because that means that he was injured for a part of the season, and that the injury is unhealed. Is it one of those injuries that a player can ignore his whole career? That would be great, but they really don't exist. SHOULD be completely healed by the start of the season, which means maybe not and also means he'll probably miss most of camp. Also, what about past trends for him? I've heard (unconfirmed) that he had injuries that hampered him earlier in his college career. Does that constitute a trend?
I mean, these are bigger concerns than AP's collarbone questions last year. I just worry about drafting damaged goods in the 1st round, that's all. I don't question the kid's effort or heart, but that won't help if he's injury prone.
The top of the draft, let's say #12-32 has some pretty even talent. Lets say guys like Otah, Williams and Albert on OL. DRC, Jenkins,Talib,Cason at CB. Harvey, Groves, Connor at OLB, Merling, Balmer on DL. and so on. You really don't know who is going to be the standout player in your system.
What that article talks about , is that Stewart really should be a standout and very soon. He has the talent to separate himself at a position that touches the football 20 some times a game. He should and will be an impact player.
Every back in college and the NFL gets nicked up during the course of the season. The article simply points out he's no different and has played through those nagging dings.
The reason, the article states that he had the toe surgery after he ran on it and worked out at the combine putting up awsome numbers on it, was that it was recomended by a few teams doctors after the combine, and so he "would be ready for the full training camp". So he complied. He listens.
He is exactely what this team needs at this point. IMHO.