Wow, I found this refreshingly accurate. Some seem to feel it is depressing, but to me, it looks pretty well reasoned.
We all know we need to upgrade most of the offensive line (or at least get better production), at TE, at OLB and S. What is new here that hasn't already been said. The nice thing is that we will enter a draft that does match up well with some of our needs.
Say we draft Chance Warmack/Jonathan Cooper/Lane Johnson and Zack Ertz in the first two rounds. That upgrades both OL and TE which are positions where players can come in and help right away. Heck, you could replace one of those spots with a S and we have still probably upgraded two spots by day one.
OLB in a 3-4 is never a quick fix, and probably won't be even if we took a guy in round 1. It is a tough transition because of how the college game is set up. This is why it is almost better to draft a player with more atheltic talent after round 1 than a guy who is limited but more polished in the first round. You could argue that this is why Jarvis Jones might drop. Personally, I would rather grab two potential edge rushers after round 1 to develop rather than hanging my hat on one guy who hopefully makes the transition in round 1. This is the potential arguement against drafting Dion Jordan or Damontre Moore in round 1.
What is funny is that despite my tendency to believe in a draft based on value and athletic potential, I would enter this draft with the mindset of drafting lower risk and lower potential players. This is not a draft full of elite talent IMO. Because of this, teams can really go one of two ways in the early rounds. They can either try to find potentially elite players in this less talented group OR they can see the draft for what it is, and grab low risk, 4 year starters who aren't probably ever going to be among the elite players in the league. A draft of Warmack, Ertz and Barrett Jones in the first 3 rounds isn't sexy, but it is low risk, and potentially fills 3 need positions (for us) for the next 4 years.
Consider our team entering the 2014 offseason with upgrades at OG, C, and TE which I don't feel is outside the realm of possibility when you are speculating on Warmack, Jones and Ertz being better than Snyder, Sendlein and King. I understand it is a strech to believe that all 3 will work out, but in terms of the draft, these three players are pretty low risk and play positions with relatively low learning curves. This sets us up for the 2014 offseason needing to upgrade at QB, RB, LT, OG, SILB, OLB, CB and S. A much more manageble list than QB, RB, TE, LT, LG, C, RG, SILB, OLB, CB, CB, S and S which we had this year (after we cut our safeties).