Suns 2024-2025 Season Discussions

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
28,046
Reaction score
10,966
Location
L.A. area
You had me until they said Chris Paul is a better player than Beal. That is simply not true, in any universe.

I guess it depends on how far into the future you're looking, but if the "universe" is the 2024-25 season, Paul has been quite a bit better than Beal.

Among other things, the number of games Paul has missed so far this season is ... zero. That's pretty darned impressive.
 

taz02

All Star
Joined
May 8, 2007
Posts
944
Reaction score
470
Whatever the case, I guarantee we wouldn't make the Beal trade again. Isn't CP3 making 10mm this year?
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
122,989
Reaction score
63,356
Interesting, the contract of James Jones expires this offseason, per Evan Sidery.

I knew he had signed a multi-year contract in 2022, but I was uncertain about the length.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
26,391
Reaction score
19,668
Location
The Giant Toaster
I’d keep Beal and see if you can make a deal with his expiring next offseason. If he doesn’t waive his NTC you can buy him out most likely. Stretching him over 5 years would be dumber than the trade itself.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
122,989
Reaction score
63,356
I’d keep Beal and see if you can make a deal with his expiring next offseason. If he doesn’t waive his NTC you can buy him out most likely. Stretching him over 5 years would be dumber than the trade itself.

This is the logical approach, but Gambo says Beal is not coming back and when he is decisive, he is usually right.

My guess is the Suns have talked with Beal's agent about a buyout and stretch or there is a team out there that will trade for him, as unlikely as it may sound.
 

leclerc

The smooth operator
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Posts
2,656
Reaction score
1,446
Location
Norway
Ish needs to sign Gillespie and avoid the topic about contract extension for JJ. Simple. Let us see what great mind Ish has. Make me a gawd dang believer. What I see is a middle aged man wearing sweatshirts and the moves he has made/approved have failed miserably.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
93,281
Reaction score
72,914
Paul is better than Beal by an extremely wide margin.
Yeah… I think if this team had CP3 this year instead of Beal they’d be much better than they are.

Beal is beyond busted. At least CP3 was helping nurture the Spurs into a better team and has been healthy all year.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
38,089
Reaction score
17,634
Location
Arizona
You had me until they said Chris Paul is a better player than Beal. That is simply not true, in any universe.
I guess that depends on perspective. If you can't rely on Beal to even play? You can make an argument lots of players are better. Not from a where is their talent level now perspective for sure considering CP3's age but from an impact on our team perspective. I think the Suns are better with CP3 on this team than Beal.....with a big caveat. Assuming CP3 would stay healthy either.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,547
Reaction score
5,059
Location
Harrisburg, PA
Come on guys, a 40 year old Chris Paul is not a better player than Bradley Beal. If you want to argue that Paul would be more valuable to the Suns or that he is a better fit- sure, that's a reasonable argument and I tend to agree. However, that's a completely different argument. I am as disappointed with Beal as you guys are, but Chris Paul at his age is not a better player than Beal.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
93,281
Reaction score
72,914
Come on guys, a 40 year old Chris Paul is not a better player than Bradley Beal. If you want to argue that Paul would be more valuable to the Suns or that he is a better fit- sure, that's a reasonable argument and I tend to agree. However, that's a completely different argument. I am as disappointed with Beal as you guys are, but Chris Paul at his age is not a better player than Beal.
What Bradley Beal have some of you been watching? He plays no defense, he shows almost zero heart on the floor, and most important, a player’s availability is just as important as his ability.
 

BirdGangThing

Cultist
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
19,524
Reaction score
25,603
Location
Arcadia
beal when healthy is a starter - cp3 will never be a starter again only due to age - as it stands today beal is the better player - if both were free agents beal would clearly command more money

that being said - if im playing a pick up game at the y tomorrow and had to choose between the two it's cp3 all day
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
19,167
Reaction score
15,084
Location
Tempe, AZ
beal when healthy is a starter - cp3 will never be a starter again only due to age - as it stands today beal is the better player - if both were free agents beal would clearly command more money

that being said - if im playing a pick up game at the y tomorrow and had to choose between the two it's cp3 all day

CP3 has started 80 games this year. Saying he's not a starter doesn't make it so. That's twice as many as Beal, for those counting.
 
OP
OP
Yuma

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
24,607
Reaction score
14,246
Location
Laveen, AZ
I’d keep Beal and see if you can make a deal with his expiring next offseason. If he doesn’t waive his NTC you can buy him out most likely. Stretching him over 5 years would be dumber than the trade itself.
IF we get to the last year of his contract, we ARE waiving and stretch THAT. No problem.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
38,089
Reaction score
17,634
Location
Arizona
Not saying this is going to happen but a fellow exec I work with that lives in New York is saying that on the local sports radio there is a ton of talk about the Knicks wanting Durant.

He also told me in a twist that the Knicks might not be interested in resigning Bridges because he never turned into the star they thought he might become after that breakout season with the Nets. Fans are upset they gave up all those picks for A good role player. In today’s market they might have to overpay to keep him and they are hesitant to tie up Star money in a guy that has only averaged 20+ points one season with the Nets.
 
Last edited:

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
26,391
Reaction score
19,668
Location
The Giant Toaster
Not saying this is going to happen but a fellow exec I work with that lives in New York is saying that on the local sports radio there is a ton of talk about the Knicks wanting Durant.

He also told me in a twist that the Knicks might not be interested in resigning Bridges because he never turned into the star they thought he might become after that breakout season with the Nets. Fans are upset they gave up all those picks for A good role player. In today’s market they might have to overpay to keep him and they are hesitant to tie up Star money in a guy that has only averaged 20+ points one season with the Nets.
It would have to be OG and Mitchell Robinson to match salaries in a deal. Not interested in that.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
38,089
Reaction score
17,634
Location
Arizona
It would have to be OG and Mitchell Robinson to match salaries in a deal. Not interested in that.
Oh yeah not saying it would be a good deal but the Bridges stuff is interesting. We gave up a ton for Durant and it didn’t work out. Knick’s give up a ton for Bridges and there is thought they overpaid with assets and it may not work out.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
122,989
Reaction score
63,356
Not saying this is going to happen but a fellow exec I work with that lives in New York is saying that on the local sports radio there is a ton of talk about the Knicks wanting Durant.

He also told me in a twist that the Knicks might not be interested in resigning Bridges because he never turned into the star they thought he might become after that breakout season with the Nets. Fans are upset they gave up all those picks for A good role player. In today’s market they might have to overpay to keep him and they are hesitant to tie up Star money in a guy that has only averaged 20+ points one season with the Nets.

It would have to be OG and Mitchell Robinson to match salaries in a deal. Not interested in that.


The Knicks overpaid for Mikal Bridges. However, I'd be interested in OG Anunoby or Bridges.

Anunoby might better fill a need because he can play power forward. Also, I'm not sure if OG has peaked. I think he can play even better.

Mitchell Robinson is an expiring contract next season and he would be fine as a backup center.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
19,167
Reaction score
15,084
Location
Tempe, AZ
The Knicks overpaid for Mikal Bridges. However, I'd be interested in OG Anunoby or Bridges.

Anunoby might better fill a need because he can play power forward. Also, I'm not sure if OG has peaked. I think he can play even better.

Mitchell Robinson is an expiring contract next season and he would be fine as a backup center.

OG can play PF in the East. He isn't what we need at PF. We need someone bigger, no less than 6'8" and a better rebounder. I like OG as a player but I think he's miscast in New York with their current crew. He'd be a disappointing centerpiece in a KD deal.
 
OP
OP
Yuma

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
24,607
Reaction score
14,246
Location
Laveen, AZ
It would have to be OG and Mitchell Robinson to match salaries in a deal. Not interested in that.
That's why it's key to jettison some of the non guaranteed contracts we have and briefly get under the second apron. Then we can do a multi player trade and more options come into play. We could trade player or players aside from KD if we wanted Bridges thrown into the trade, for example.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,913
Reaction score
12,331
Come on guys, a 40 year old Chris Paul is not a better player than Bradley Beal. If you want to argue that Paul would be more valuable to the Suns or that he is a better fit- sure, that's a reasonable argument and I tend to agree. However, that's a completely different argument. I am as disappointed with Beal as you guys are, but Chris Paul at his age is not a better player than Beal.

Paul is worlds better than Beal, it isn’t even close. The stats show this to be a fact in almost every way imaginable. Advanced stats show Paul to still be a high quality player, and portray Beal as being utterly terrible.

Beal had the worst splits of any player on the Suns by a huge margin.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
122,989
Reaction score
63,356
OG can play PF in the East. He isn't what we need at PF. We need someone bigger, no less than 6'8" and a better rebounder. I like OG as a player but I think he's miscast in New York with their current crew. He'd be a disappointing centerpiece in a KD deal.

I could see the Suns playing bookend forwards with OG. He can play both forward positions and seems to fit the new style of NBA play. I'd like to get more for Durant, but I think he is a solid return.
 
Top