Divide Et Impera
Registered User
Whatever. Just go with it.
Rondo-Ellis-Smith-Ibaka-Gasol
Happy?
The lesson is keep your picks and be careful in free agency.
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand the simple logic of your statement. Somehow the Sarver Suns just don't get it.
Oh, he gets it more than any other owner. He views draft picks as liabilities and negative cash flows. If he trades picks for cash, he has acquired liquid assets and created positive cash flow. That's how he does it....
The way the Suns are going they will be lucky to win 40 games next season.
I would appreciate a 40-42 season if the focal point wasnt a 38 year old PG who is 5 years removed from his MVP season.Yeah, we might really appreciate a 40-42 season in a couple years from now the way Sarver is running the franchise into the ground.
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand the simple logic of your statement. Somehow the Sarver Suns just don't get it.
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand the simple logic of your statement. Somehow the Sarver Suns just don't get it.
Honestly though, wasn't this DAntoni as much or more than Sarver. If a coach say that he doesn't develop rookies and he won't play rookies, but he really could use so and so as a free agent, is he going to draft rookies anyway? If Sarver has any sense at all, he is going to trust he bball people because he is not a bball guy.
In the end, and I am not one who really likes Sarver, DAntoni is at the root of alot of this mess.
Agreed. It's possible that it was all Sarver and Mike was just doing and saying what he needed in order to please his boss but I find that highly unlikely. I think the next couple of drafts will tell us just how bad off we're going to be with Sarver as owner. I'm hoping it's nowhere near as bad as most people here believe.
Steve
How do you explain this last off-season?
Well, it's the only recent off-season that really makes sense except for failing to trade Nash. We didn't really have a front office when most of the actions took place and it looks to me like they just tried to acquire assets without regard to fit. Then, once the season began, they tried to make the moves necessary to make this team competitive. Keep in mind that I wish they HADN"T tried to make this team competitive but that's a different story.
I think it's possible that the consensus opinion here is correct, Sarver really is the devil. He might be ruled by nothing more than greed as many here suggest. But, I'm just not completely convinced. As bad as some of our decisions have been (and many of them have been horrible), it seems to me that he has been willing to spend money. I'm hoping that the draft-selling mistakes of the past have been a learning process for him and that he has gathered together a management team that can start positioning us for future success. I'm not confident this is the case, merely hopeful.
I know that most people here want to keep judging Sarver by the mistakes of the past and that is certainly understandable - I just choose to see a glimmer of light in the darkness.
Steve
I know that most people here want to keep judging Sarver by the mistakes of the past and that is certainly understandable - I just choose to see a glimmer of light in the darkness.
Steve
Bryan Colangelo, the Phoenix Son, was trained by an excellent promoter and a non-Championship caliber GM, and promoted by nepotism. He hadn't earned the job, he inherited it.BC was executive of the year, but left a bunch of problems in his wake. We could also add that he did a crappy job of training Sarver.
Bryan Colangelo, the Phoenix Son, was trained by an excellent promoter and a non-Championship caliber GM, and promoted by nepotism. He hadn't earned the job, he inherited it.
His overall performance as GM in Phoenix and Toronto reflect that.
Despite one award, Bryan did not have the expertise or depth of experience to train anyone to be GM, let alone a Head Coach/GM combination, who made fun of defense and said it wasn't his job to develop young players.
A pick and Dragic....who tore it up in his last few games for Houston, given a starting role in an NBA offense not named Nashball.....and how do you explain trading a pick for aaron brooks?