Western Font
ASFN Lifer
I’d say Nash is number one but I could be talked into KJ. Too bad off-court stuff has tarnished both his and Kidd’s reputations.
For a point guard though offense (team and individual) is far more important than defense IMO. If you're talking about traditional centers, I'd go the other way. Steve's job was to make that offense run and he did it perfectly, except when refs allowed defenders to slap his arms off the ball late in games.Your comment leads me to realize I wasn't clear enough. I had in mind which of them was the second best point guard. I can never cite Nash because he couldn't play defense. He is an oddball in strengths, weaknesses and playmaking style.
I was just thinking about who would be the second best point guard in Suns history after Chris Paul. Since I choose Jason Kidd as the second-best overall because of his defense and his playmaking skill, I wonder whether Jason Kidd had any notable success defending Chris Paul--they would have met enough times, when Paul was young and Kidd was fairly old. It's just that Kidd, being much bigger, is physically right to exploit Paul's limitation of being a very short player.
Imagine him with no hand checking.KJ played tough and it was the early 90s. If his career happened later he’d walk to the basket, and there’d be no Charles Oakley waiting for him.
Same. And I think KJ has a good argument to be above Nash… he had a 7 year run that was better with more division titles, just as many conference finals appearances and a Finals appearances. And was really carrying the team his first five years pre-Barkley when they made to WCF trips and two second round exits.The answer is unequiviqly Steve Nash. Quite frankly put me down for Kevin Johnson over Jason Kidd.
People say this a lot about Nash but Nash just wasn’t close to Curry’s ability to shake guys and get to the hole or give him just enough space to let a ridiculous shot fly.Besides that Steve Nash presented the huge issue of always being a defensive liability, his playmaking style was high-risk and turnover-prone. The assist-man have a good player to assist or his skill is wasted, and it's just no use if he makes passes too difficult for teammates to catch. Hey, Steve...the air is not your teammate.
He could also exasperate me for not exploiting his great shooting skill a bit more. The opposing team, especially the Spurs, sometimes guarded Nash (or not him but his teammates) so well that they just couldn't get free for the assist, either to make it or to take it. And if Nash couldn't find them to pass the ball to, he just...waited for them. So shoot the damn ball--you're good at that too. There would come the point, especially against the Spurs, where Nash was running in his little circles looking for someone to assist...and I'd groan. "Oh, no--he's running his little circles again." If Nash were playing now, he might be Stephen Curry's closest competitor in shooting. If he cared to try.
No question for me CP3 is the best. However, I also think Nash was better than KJ. KJ was a solid player. Love him. He was my first Suns autograph ever. KJ really didn't have the ability to take over games as often as the other two guys. He was a steady and consistent player for sure. You know what held him back? People forget all those games he missed with hamstring problems. Then they found out YEARS later they were caused by an undiagnosed hernia.Same. And I think KJ has a good argument to be above Nash… he had a 7 year run that was better with more division titles, just as many conference finals appearances and a Finals appearances. And was really carrying the team his first five years pre-Barkley when they made to WCF trips and two second round exits.
Oh, TOTALLY disagree. KJ could absolutely take over games, especially early in his career. His first four seasons with us he averaged 21 ppg/11 asst and then jumped up to 23 ppg in the playoffs. Then after playing super second fiddle to Charles in their first post-season, he turned on the keys the next two playoffs when he averaged 25 ppg.No question for me CP3 is the best. However, I also think Nash was better than KJ. KJ was a solid player. Love him. He was my first Suns autograph ever. KJ really didn't have the ability to take over games as often as the other two guys. He was a steady and consistent player for sure. You know what held him back? People forget all those games he missed with hamstring problems. Then they found out YEARS later they were caused by an undiagnosed hernia.
What I meant by that is he played at that level pretty consistently.Oh, TOTALLY disagree. KJ could absolutely take over games, especially early in his career. His first four seasons with us he averaged 21 ppg/11 asst and then jumped up to 23 ppg in the playoffs. Then after playing super second fiddle to Charles in their first post-season, he turned on the keys the next two playoffs when he averaged 25 ppg.
“Steady and consistent” doesn’t describe KJ to me at all. He was a 5 TIME ALL-NBA player.
You don’t get to 5 All NBA Teams just being “solid”, Covert. In a PG dominated time, he was consistently one of the best in the league.What I meant by that is he played at that level pretty consistently.
Oh, TOTALLY disagree. KJ could absolutely take over games, especially early in his career. His first four seasons with us he averaged 21 ppg/11 asst and then jumped up to 23 ppg in the playoffs. Then after playing super second fiddle to Charles in their first post-season, he turned on the keys the next two playoffs when he averaged 25 ppg.
“Steady and consistent” doesn’t describe KJ to me at all. He was a 5 TIME ALL-NBA player.
It wasn't meant to be a slight on him. To me he was one of the most solid PG in the game at that time. He wasn't a Superstar PG but he was really good. Maybe that's a better term.You don’t get to 5 All NBA Teams just being “solid”, Covert. In a PG dominated time, he was consistently one of the best in the league.
Yeah his hammies really set him back and prevented him from that next tier up IMO. I remember going to many games where he would have a great game then all of the sudden be out for the remainder of the game. Had they diagnosed his hernia sooner? He wouldn't have had all those problems with them for so long.KJ was incredible. He was lightning quick and could break down any defense. Had it not been for his hammies, he'd be a hall of famer. He only played 10 years. He'd excel in today's game with his drive and dish abilities and I have no doubt he would've added a consistent 3 point shot as he rarely took the shot but he was deadly in the midrange.
Nash was an MVP and All-star. There were a ton of games he just took over shooting or passing the ball. There were times he brought us back from the brink. There were times where he had ice water running through his veins and crushed teams spirits. There is no question for me in terms of tenured Suns PG he was the best. Again, if you count CP3 I still give the nod to him only because he transformed this team but he has done it consistently everywhere he has been.Nash is getting a little bit of disrespect here. The Suns never gave him a rim protector or quality backup to make his life easier. When he was off the court the Suns were a mess.
Nobody complained about Parker’s defense because he had Duncan protecting the paint and Ginobili to take some pressure off. Not keeping Joe really hurt because Diaw was really our 2nd best distributor.
That's a little over the top. There was no backup PG that was going to be Steve Nash, but LB and Dragic were perfectly fine most of the time.Nash is getting a little bit of disrespect here. The Suns never gave him a rim protector or quality backup to make his life easier. When he was off the court the Suns were a mess.
Nobody complained about Parker’s defense because he had Duncan protecting the paint and Ginobili to take some pressure off. Not keeping Joe really hurt because Diaw was really our 2nd best distributor.
Boston just added Brogdon for Pennies on the dollar. He would have been a nice get to backup CP3.
He would have been a great backup here but he's making $24 million a year, which prices him out of our range. The Suns won't be taking on a deal like that while everything is up in the air with KD and Ayton.
I don’t consider the Goran years to be Nash’s peak. Barbosa was always a liability vs San Antonio/Dallas in the playoffs.That's a little over the top. There was no backup PG that was going to be Steve Nash, but LB and Dragic were perfectly fine most of the time.
I'm curious why you think Nash is getting disrespected?
I would agree with that, however, I don't think KJ is that far behind. If it wasn't for Tim Hardaway or Gary Payton, KJ would have gotten more respect at the time. Then again, his hamstring also stopped him from becoming one of the greatest of all time.I don’t consider the Goran years to be Nash’s peak. Barbosa was always a liability vs San Antonio/Dallas in the playoffs.
Maybe disrespect is the wrong word but peak Nash was a phenomenon and his prime here was better than any other PG we’ve had.