YouJustGotSUNSD
Custom User Title!
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Posts
- 5,168
- Reaction score
- 0
^yeah that^
2010 is way overblown. There are so many teams clearing cap space just for that free agency (the Nets are already saying the plan to sign two players to max contracts), that the really great free agents are going to snapped up by the more promising teams, and the rest of the teams are going to end up overpaying some borderline all-star just to appease their fans.
You guys are seriously overrating Chandler. Even if we do snag him, we're still a borderline Top-6 team in the West with an old PG and an injury prone headcase PF.
You guys are seriously overrating Chandler. Even if we do snag him, we're still a borderline Top-6 team in the West with an old PG and an injury prone headcase PF.
So basically, as I've said before, the Suns can have Chandler if they want him, basically for nothing. There is no argument that having Chandler as our starting center, as opposed to not having Chandler and being forced to start Lopez, will make us a better team next season. We already gave away Shaq for nothing and getting Chandler is the only way to justify that move. Will Sarver do what's best for the team, or will he buy-out Wallace and pocket the money?From Ric Bucher:
"FYI: Phx can deal Big Ben for Ty Chandler anytime they want. They're checking all other options before going down that road."
So basically, as I've said before, the Suns can have Chandler if they want him, basically for nothing. There is no argument that having Chandler as our starting center, as opposed to not having Chandler and being forced to start Lopez, will make us a better team next season. We already gave away Shaq for nothing and getting Chandler is the only way to justify that move. Will Sarver do what's best for the team, or will he buy-out Wallace and pocket the money?
Can you envision any other scenario in which the Suns are borderline top-6 in the West next season? I sure can't. If they can't trade Stoudemire for a good rebuilding package now, I'll all for making the next two seasons as pain-free as possible. Might as well be "sorta good" if it's the best option on the table.
But if the Suns aren't going to reinvest that $20 million in order to improve the team now, then how is it justified? Shaq was in the final year of his contract, so the team's financial position would have looked exactly the same next summer regardless of whether or not they traded Shaq now. If they kept Shaq, they could still do whatever they are planning on doing next summer.Getting Chandler is not the only way to justify the Shaq trade. Getting $20 mil off your payroll is justification for Shaq trade.
But if the Suns aren't going to reinvest that $20 million in order to improve the team now, then how is it justified? Shaq was in the final year of his contract, so the team's financial position would have looked exactly the same next summer regardless of whether or not they traded Shaq now. If they kept Shaq, they could still do whatever they are planning on doing next summer.
But if the Suns aren't going to reinvest that $20 million in order to improve the team now, then how is it justified? Shaq was in the final year of his contract, so the team's financial position would have looked exactly the same next summer regardless of whether or not they traded Shaq now. If they kept Shaq, they could still do whatever they are planning on doing next summer.
I wonder why no talk about buying Pavolic out. Maybe the Suns are exploring trading him like Wallace. Pavolic's full salary with a buyout might be attractive to some team and might bring Phoenix a better player back. However, I'm sure Phoenix would like a buyout on at least one of these two players.
___________________________________
Again, I read somewhere that Kerr is trying to milk the Hornets for a pick to go along with Chandler. I really think that is funny.
Why? The Suns need a pick, and they're doing NO a huge favor by taking Chandler off their hands. Remember, NO tried to trade him last year but he failed a physical.
They're getting exactly what they want. An expiring, most likely bought out, contract. Phoenix is taking a small risk in bringing Chandler in due to his salary / health concerns. But we've seen what the Suns training staff can do.
I'd probably demand a 1st round pick too.
Good on Kerr if this is true.
He has a bum toe, and IIRC that doctor that did the surgery is the one who stopped the trade because of the toe.What was the original Chandler deal that got nixed because of failed physical? I can't remember the details.
Yeah but was it Chandler for Kwame Brown straight up with OKC?He has a bum toe, and IIRC that doctor that did the surgery is the one who stopped the trade because of the toe.