Hopefully Watson can be more then just some internal hire we are settling for. He did show he had the team, and they played hard, so hopefully what looks sort of bad, turns out ok.
However lets be clear that the team was at rock bottom, we got rid of Morris, and he only coached the team for 33 games and a .272 winning percentage. Not really much time for players to turn on a coach.
I don't know why we didn't take more time. The draft isn't for another two months, and the season isn't for another 6+ months.
Just right now on ESPN the Warriors announced they would allow Luke Walton to interview with other teams.
Of course I know the likely sentiment around the league is that this isn't a good job, but it's an opportunity we'll never get a chance to try for with Walton now that we've hired Watson. Possibly we had discussions behind the scenes but from where we stand, we can't assume that.
A guy like Luke Walton or maybe someone else might help land some free agents.
Earl Watson I suspect will not help. Maybe help and not help is a bit off, maybe more like a free agent seeing a Walton might be more willing to be on board because it looks like a step in the right direction, whereas hiring internally just looks like more of the same.
One would think there would be hope we could of gotten Walton. Walton went to UofA, so he's lived in Arizona before, and Sarver's UofA connections might have helped woo him.
I know players supported Watson, but does that really matter when they likely would've supported Walton or some other high profile guy?
Does it really matter when many of these guys aren't going to be here in a year or two? Some think Knight might be trade bait and might hold back Booker. Teletovic and Price probably aren't long term answers. The bottom line is we're a bad team, and to get good, many of these guys are going to have to be shipped out, so I don't know why they're clinging to the players like him when even that might fade next year.