You missed my point. There is reason to believe that Sarver cuts the wrong corners, I was just questioning why you had it along with a link to an article. Usually, we do that to support our position and IMO there was nothing there to support it so I was curious where you were going.
BTW, I don't think the Amare thing applies in any way. We were willing to give him lots and lots of money. He wanted the extra year IIRC and we were unwilling to go that far beyond what insurance would cover. And we were absolutely right. The guys we signed to replace him are a good example of him being willing to pay for players but also calls into question his understanding of player value.
I don't think this hiring had anything to do with money. I believe we were trapped. We gave him the interim tag, he did what was asked of him and the players bought in completely. Getting players to buy into your coach is such a big part of the equation it really made no sense to look elsewhere. Until they each, to a man, voiced support for Watson, I think he was just one of the candidates.