- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,028
- Reaction score
- 58,324
More from Adrian Wojnarowski.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I feared 4y/$100m and wanted 4y/$80m so I'm happy with 4y/$90m.
James Jones has done a great job with everyone else's contracts this offseason. I'm really curious what the issue with Ayton is now. Even if he's not extended, I'd call this offseason a B+.
I'm glad Bridge's extension is done. Extending both next off season would have been a tough task.
I started getting worried someone would throw the max at him. He's good and I don't think a team would regret it very much but the Suns couldn't afford to pay that. This also keeps his salary more manageable in the future. Usually when a player is maxed then that is the bar they always look at, kind of like Marion back in the day. Worth the rookie max, not the max at 28. That second max should be reserved for legit All-Stars who can be a teams #1, IMO.
I think having a good well-rounded center is more important than having a good 2 way small forward but with Mikal, you know the year around effort you're going to get. Ayton has the potential to be a generational center but he's given us reasons to question whether he has the heart and head to make that happen. I'd pay them both but I'll worry far more about DA living up to his deal than I will Mikal.Bridges is definitely worth $90 million over four years. Giving Ayton the max is much more risky although I want it to get done.
This way the Suns are sure to keep at least one of the two.
I think having a good well-rounded center is more important than having a good 2 way small forward but with Mikal, you know the year around effort you're going to get. Ayton has the potential to be a generational center but he's given us reasons to question whether he has the heart and head to make that happen. I'd pay them both but I'll worry far more about DA living up to his deal than I will Mikal.
It's like when the Suns drafted Steve Nash, he was considered the "safe choice." That's Mikal.
Certainly Ayton has the higher upside but the financial risk is much greater. If push comes to shove Ayton should offer good trade value.
I'm still hoping Deandre gets extended though. I haven't lost confidence in him. However, I understand it's more risky.
I didn't really know much about him when we traded for him but I've been very impressed so far. Not that the preseason means anything but it's enough to raise my hopes so I hope we can get a deal done.The Suns have discussed a deal with Landry Shamet. I wondering if this is picking up the option or something more.
I didn't really know much about him when we traded for him but I've been very impressed so far. Not that the preseason means anything but it's enough to raise my hopes so I hope we can get a deal done.
I wish I could but until we once again have our own G League team, it's highly unlikely that we will be able to add a 2 way prospect that has potential. More likely, we'll just use it to fill out our roster cheaply. Which frankly is the smart thing to do because we can't give real minutes to a 2 way player or the 15th guy on our roster.The same here. I was too focused on Miles McBride until I saw more of Shamet.
Shamet fills a lot of needs at shooting guard and some point guard. I like what he brings to the table.
Promise me if McBride gets waived we sign him to a two-way contract.
I wish I could but until we once again have our own G League team, it's highly unlikely that we will be able to add a 2 way prospect that has potential. More likely, we'll just use it to fill out our roster cheaply. Which frankly is the smart thing to do because we can't give real minutes to a 2 way player or the 15th guy on our roster.
Sure but those guys want minutes and money so they can show they deserve more minutes and money. We can't develop a player at the G League level for the obvious reasons so a talented player is going to look elsewhere for a 2 way contract. I'm not saying we'd turn away a quality prospect, I'm saying they'd likely have no interest in us.It would be more about keeping his rights if a two contract can do this.
Sure but those guys want minutes and money so they can show they deserve more minutes and money. We can't develop a player at the G League level for the obvious reasons so a talented player is going to look elsewhere for a 2 way contract. I'm not saying we'd turn away a quality prospect, I'm saying they'd likely have no interest in us.
And remember, a 2 way player can't be up with the big club for more than 45 days per season. So we're better off looking for an older veteran willing to play irregular minutes to fill our last spot.
I wish I could but until we once again have our own G League team, it's highly unlikely that we will be able to add a 2 way prospect that has potential. More likely, we'll just use it to fill out our roster cheaply. Which frankly is the smart thing to do because we can't give real minutes to a 2 way player or the 15th guy on our roster.
Sure but those guys want minutes and money so they can show they deserve more minutes and money. We can't develop a player at the G League level for the obvious reasons so a talented player is going to look elsewhere for a 2 way contract. I'm not saying we'd turn away a quality prospect, I'm saying they'd likely have no interest in us.
And remember, a 2 way player can't be up with the big club for more than 45 days per season. So we're better off looking for an older veteran willing to play irregular minutes to fill our last spot.
You're right, it was brought up here when it happened and I completely forgot about it. I guess that might give us a chance at a player with potential but minutes will still be an issue especially if the player needs PT to develop.That has changed quite a bit. Last year it was thrown out entirely because of Covid and I read they were trying to eliminate restrictions this also. A player has to spend some time with the G League team but it's minimal at this point. Two-way players aren't playoff eligible either.
Edit - Source https://nba.nbcsports.com/2021/07/1...relaxed-two-way-player-rules-for-next-season/
If the Suns can wrap up Ayton and Shamet what an off season it would be with room and assets to make another move later on.
I meant to comment about Shamet's extension the other day. Money wise I've heard they're trying to get him to sign to a similar deal as Cam Payne. I'm glad they view him as a piece of the future and not just a rental. I know I disputed the claims his trade was made for salary purposes and extending him should prove that narrative was false.
He's impressed this preseason and I expect him to only be prove himself more valuable as the season continues.
Signing Shamet as a rental is what I most feared. From what I have seen he has bright future if the Suns can sign him to a multi-year contract. He gives the Suns a lot of versatility at guard and makes a nice backup for Booker.
I really don't see how some believe that trade was only made for financial reasons now that we've seen what Shamet can do as a Sun. I know its preseason but that's where role players shine brightest because they're featured more. Examining financials it doesnt really add up either since the savings were really negligible. It's like $2 million in savings next season IF Shamet is allowed to walk but that ignores how he will most definitely provide more this year than the #29 pick and Carter would have.
It's easy to revert to a blame Sarver mentality when something doesn't go as you want and there was some early history as a Suns owner to support it. However, that's more of a knee jerk reaction in recent years.
As for me, I invested more time than I should have in studying players in the 2021 draft. When the 29th pick was traded away for a player I hardly knew (other than name recognition) it's easy to think the worst. After watching Shamet play that trade is looking like a steal.
Personally I do enjoy watching young players develop so there will always be a part of me that wants that. Now that Stix has shown some signs of developing, I'm hoping the Suns can keep him and add a veteran later on to fill out the roster.
I didn't intend to single you out or for it to seem I was calling you specifically. I know you spend more time analyzing end of the bench youngsters than any other fan I know, which is appreciated because I don't have the time to research them myself but I'll check out the people you're high on.
It's a lot of fun seeing players grow and develop, whether it's Devin Booker or Dragan Bender. Of course you want to see all of them make it but that's unrealistic. Seeing some go from being a Cam Payne type of castoff to what he is today is one of my favorite parts of following the NBA. It's not just the development but the hard work and perseverance that makes it more enthralling.
But yes, it's easy to blame Sarver for being penny wise and pound foolish. He has a deserved history of being meddlesome that earned his reputation. It shouldnt be the first response to a move that actually makes sense on paper though and the Shamet trade made sense. He's a better player than Carter, who was my favorite Sun outside of Booker for most of last season. I didn't want to see him go but it makes us a better team adding Shamet in his place and whoever we could have added at #29. #29 could have been good but the odds of them being more impactful than Shamet this season are virtually nonexistent and a team with Chris Paul at the helm needs to think about this season more than 2-3 years down the road.
A little off topic, I've never seen so many young point guards not on 15 man rosters that can potentially help a team later on if a team is patient