An erratic offense leads to turnovers, which frequently turns into easy fast break points going the other way. This is part of the Suns defensive woes.
They are not a good passing team. Too much one-on-one stuff. The idea of two combo guards running the offense has not worked with Beal out.
Beal's ball handling is significantly better than Gordon's.And I don't see it working with Beal back. Beal and Gordon are similar players in terms of skill set. At Gordon's best, back when we tried to get him as a RFA a decade ago, he was a lot like Beal is now. Maybe not as good of a volume scorer but definitely 90% of Beal. As a 3rd option in 2023 though Beal isn't going to be much more than Gordon at his best now. I thought having Gordon would allow us to keep up if/when either Beal or Booker was out. So long as we had 2 of those 3, we'd be fine. We haven't seen that. Booker and Gordon are the 2 best combo guards we've had most of this season and our offense isn't much better than if only 1 of them plays.
And I don't see it working with Beal back. Beal and Gordon are similar players in terms of skill set. At Gordon's best, back when we tried to get him as a RFA a decade ago, he was a lot like Beal is now. Maybe not as good of a volume scorer but definitely 90% of Beal. As a 3rd option in 2023 though Beal isn't going to be much more than Gordon at his best now. I thought having Gordon would allow us to keep up if/when either Beal or Booker was out. So long as we had 2 of those 3, we'd be fine. We haven't seen that. Booker and Gordon are the 2 best combo guards we've had most of this season and our offense isn't much better than if only 1 of them plays.
Beal's ball handling is significantly better than Gordon's.
I do think that part of the problem may be solved if both Booker and Beal are available, however how likely is that to be a regular occurrence?
It is a recipe for disaster but it's all we have to cook with. Last year's playoff roster clearly wasn't going to be be enough to win it all. Right now, our offseason trades seem like a failed experiment but riding with it is about our only option until we're ready to sell off all our assets and start anew.Relying on all three to be healthy at the right time is a recipe for disaster. I'm really down on Beal's back, backs - like hammies, can reoccur almost at random.
Beal's ball handling is significantly better than Gordon's.
I do think that part of the problem may be solved if both Booker and Beal are available, however how likely is that to be a regular occurrence?
As a secondary playmaker/ball handler, possibly and probably third behind Durant, will the slight increase in Beal's ball handling to Gordon's be what makes this offense hum? I don't think so.
Beal will be guarded as the third option about the same as Gordon is now behind the 3pt line and teams will send help a little more when he attacks the rim. That's the primary difference, as far as I'd imagine. Our offense is a mess much higher up the chain than changing our 3rd option will fix.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Nah. Our problem is we now have TWO Superstar front runners. Booker’s been the architect of back to back 2-0 leads, failing to show up at all in those closeout games and falling off a cliff once the team was punched back.We've got a superstar front runner and it ain't Booker.
Nah. Our problem is we now have TWO Superstar front runners. Booker’s been the architect of back to back 2-0 leads, failing to show up at all in those closeout games and falling off a cliff once the team was punched back.
And he was flat out horrific in back to back 30 point home losses to end back to back seasons.
He dropped 40 points twice in the finals after we were up 2-0.
He didn't play well in the elimination disasters in 22 and 23 but no one did, and he was playing out of his mind last year up until Jeff Green did him dirty.
If he were a true front runner he would have left ages ago, or twice bailed on his teams to join whoever had the best record the year before.
He dropped 40 points twice in the finals after we were up 2-0.
He didn't play well in the elimination disasters in 22 and 23 but no one did, and he was playing out of his mind last year up until Jeff Green did him dirty.
If he were a true front runner he would have left ages ago, or twice bailed on his teams to join whoever had the best record the year before.
In Books era we've been good since the 20-21 Finals season. This is year 4 of Book's good era. Pulling the carpet out from Book's legacy seems a bit premature. These next two years will determine whether prime Book is good enough to get us back to the finals or win it all.
And I don't see it working with Beal back. Beal and Gordon are similar players in terms of skill set. At Gordon's best, back when we tried to get him as a RFA a decade ago, he was a lot like Beal is now. Maybe not as good of a volume scorer but definitely 90% of Beal. As a 3rd option in 2023 though Beal isn't going to be much more than Gordon at his best now. I thought having Gordon would allow us to keep up if/when either Beal or Booker was out. So long as we had 2 of those 3, we'd be fine. We haven't seen that. Booker and Gordon are the 2 best combo guards we've had most of this season and our offense isn't much better than if only 1 of them plays.
Yeah, I don't know any way to take that comment other than as a shot at Booker. Different coach, completely different roster, Booker is the only real constant. I don't consider him a "quitter" but we've had some embarrassing collapses during his time here.