Originally posted by PhiLLmattiC
Penny through a mean alley to Marion in the forth. Sportscenter Top Ten...He makes it look easy. I wonder if he does taht once a game.
Actually, he does. And most of the people on this board know that.
I agree. I really do not remember any of the lazy passes we have harped about entering last night. I thought Hardaway played a very nice game.
Well, the box score gave Penny 0 turnovers. They probably figured that Jake Voskhul caught the ball and then just turned it over himself. It didn't really happen like that, but it was Jake's fault nonetheless. So, let's all agree that Penny DID NOT HAVE HIS LAZY PASS OF THE NIGHT.
I do think D'Antoni is going to start playing him down the stretch. He seems to catch on much more quickly than Frank Johnson.
You would hope so, but nothing he has done seems to point that out. After having a superb 1st 4 quarters against Seattle, Mike D'Antoni decided it was best for the team if Penny did not play in the fourth quarter. That almost cost us the game. Luckily, Penny was allowed to inbound the ball and win the game for us with his pass, but that doesn't reflect too well on D'Antoni. Then, last night Penny comes in and more or less dominates the game. With Stephon Marbury passing so well and Penny shooting so well, it should normally make sense that the two could've worked well together last night. Instead, he played Penny 19 minutes! And a good portion of those minutes were without Stephon even in the game. How could you play Penny who was definately one of our best offensive players last night just 19 minutes, and then play JJ for 40??
Moreover, I understand that you want to rest Stephon Marbury, but D'Antoni has to do a better job of managing the time when he's out. You can't rest him for like 8 minutes straight like he did last night and hope to win a close game. Maybe he should rest more in the first half, or maybe, since we're riddled with injuries, you just can't rest him as much as you'd like. But last night's management of Stephon's minutes was piss-poor.
I don't know about this D'Antoni character. He wants us to be an uptempo, high scoring team. He wants us to play a brand of basketball that fans want to see. He has an infatuation with Joe Johnson. Hmm, don't his "wants" sound an awful lot like the Colangelo's wants? And let's not forget, we're 1-5 with him at the helm. I understand he hasn't had Amare, but in his goal to score more points, we've ended up scoring just 2 more ppg than with Frank Johnson, but allowing our opponent to score 10 more. That's not a winning formula. His plays out of the timeout have been noticeably better, and I'm not just talking about the game-winner against Seattle, but other than that, this team has been worse than under Frank Johnson.