Yuma
Suns are my Kryptonite!
Len signed with Toronto
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Silver would have to void this.
Translation; Wall definitely wants out, ASAP.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
If that happens I think I’m just finally out on the nba.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Silver would have to void this.
Borgoh my god. I will stop watching the NBA if that happens.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Silver would have to void this.
Yeah. Me too. I would not have a problem wishing the Lakers all the bad karma in the world.If that happens I think I’m just finally out on the nba.
Would you want it voided if the Suns were the team? Please don’t be so short sighted and biased.He absolutely would have to void it. That cannot be allowed to happen.
Yeah. Me too. I would not have a problem wishing the Lakers all the bad karma in the world.
Would you want it voided if the Suns were the team? Please don’t be so short sighted and biased.
The Lakers should have had that dirty little Chris Paul years ago, but the league stepped in. Lakers only team to be punished for tampering when the league does it all the time. I get so tired of teams fans with lousy ownership cry foul.
oh my god. I will stop watching the NBA if that happens.
I would not care about the long-term health of the league. I would just check out. If fans cannot see the conflict of interest in a player, who is also an owner in a sports agency and also building his own team, I just do not know what to say. Sports leagues are built on competition, and if competition does not exist, then the league dies. Its that simple.Okay I get why some Laker fans would whine if Silver voided this kind of move and I get why some short sighted Laker fans might consider that a league outcry over the signing would be "biased" but how does "short sighted" enter the picture from your perspective?
From our perspective, calling your perspective short sighted is accurate. Whether we're right or wrong is mostly inconsequential. From the perspective of many fans, super teams, especially super teams created by the players themselves, are bad for the long term health of the league.
Okay I get why some Laker fans would whine if Silver voided this kind of move and I get why some short sighted Laker fans might consider that a league outcry over the signing would be "biased" but how does "short sighted" enter the picture from your perspective?
From our perspective, calling your perspective short sighted is accurate. Whether we're right or wrong is mostly inconsequential. From the perspective of many fans, super teams, especially super teams created by the players themselves, are bad for the long term health of the league.
This has nothing to do with race. That's insulting.The record since 2010 is clear: super teams lead to higher ratings, more league revenue, and higher team valuations, so—from a financial perspective if a few white folks get sad that black folks are determining their destinies in a country that told them they couldn’t for hundreds of years and still bristles when they have the gall to do so—I don’t think the league should or would care to “stop” it.
What makes it more interesting to me is the NBAPA side of this: LeBron and AD taking knowingly less money is not something I would think the union would necessarily condone (although it does show player empowerment). Of course this is exactly what other stars have done in multiple sports for decades (Duncan and Tom Brady are the most noteworthy examples), so it would be interesting to see the reactions leaguewide at every level.
Of course, the remedy to getting your ass beat by bigger stronger better people isn’t to call Adam Silver and ask for him to intervene. It’s to, you know, lobby for new clauses in the CBA to deter perceived “anti-competitive” activity like team-building. Good luck with that!
Also, the Paul trade to LAL that was nixed was materially different:
1. The NBA owned the Hornets and had a fiduciary obligation to protect its best interests in not making a bad decision in a way that is totally inapt here.
2. It was a trade, not a freely made decision by a unrestricted free agent.
This has nothing to do with race. That's insulting.
Would you want it voided if the Suns were the team? Please don’t be so short sighted and biased.
The Lakers should have had that dirty little Chris Paul years ago, but the league stepped in. Lakers only team to be punished for tampering when the league does it all the time. I get so tired of teams fans with lousy ownership cry foul.
Okay I get why some Laker fans would whine if Silver voided this kind of move and I get why some short sighted Laker fans might consider that a league outcry over the signing would be "biased" but how does "short sighted" enter the picture from your perspective?
From our perspective, calling your perspective short sighted is accurate. Whether we're right or wrong is mostly inconsequential. From the perspective of many fans, super teams, especially super teams created by the players themselves, are bad for the long term health of the league.
The NFL has a system in place that protects small market teams from losing their star players. The NBA does not. Also, there are not player orchestrated dynasties in the NFL. Find an NBA comparison and I will let you know, but this race-baiting thing is insulting and tiresome.Were you mad when Tom Brady took less money so the Pats could sign expensive FAs for their dynasty?
No, none of us did. Many here thought the announcement was crass, and that the move would hurt the competitive balance of the league (which it did for a short period). At the end of the day, for me, it’s not so much sour grapes as is the fact that the league just becomes less enjoyable when players are constantly super teaming. I don’t begrudge them doing so. They’re adults who can make the beat decisions for themselves. But unlike football or baseball, one player’s departure from a team can crush that team and their addition to another team with two superstars just makes the team near unbeatable. It’s just not fun to watch the nba as a result. I guess there’s a reason my interest in the nba waned during the Miami heat and golden state (other than their first championship) runs. Not saying anyone else has to adopt my perspective.You have said that after LeBron’s Decision and several times after it as well, haven’t you?
The record since 2010 is clear: super teams lead to higher ratings, more league revenue, and higher team valuations, so—from a financial perspective if a few white folks get sad that black folks are determining their destinies in a country that told them they couldn’t for hundreds of years and still bristles when they have the gall to do so—I don’t think the league should or would care to “stop” it.
What makes it more interesting to me is the NBAPA side of this: LeBron and AD taking knowingly less money is not something I would think the union would necessarily condone (although it does show player empowerment). Of course this is exactly what other stars have done in multiple sports for decades (Duncan and Tom Brady are the most noteworthy examples), so it would be interesting to see the reactions leaguewide at every level.
Of course, the remedy to getting your ass beat by bigger stronger better people isn’t to call Adam Silver and ask for him to intervene. It’s to, you know, lobby for new clauses in the CBA to deter perceived “anti-competitive” activity like team-building. Good luck with that!
Also, the Paul trade to LAL that was nixed was materially different:
1. The NBA owned the Hornets and had a fiduciary obligation to protect its best interests in not making a bad decision in a way that is totally inapt here.
2. It was a trade, not a freely made decision by a unrestricted free agent.
That may be true and it’s why I only comment on my actions. I would just lose interest. It’s why, for the most part, I’ve lost interest in baseball. Dodgers have such a competitive advantage compared to the dbacks that entering every season I say “what’s the point?” I’m not saying I check out completely. For instance if the dbacks have a good season I’ll start following them, but my season-to-season fandom is close to nil due to the uncompetitive nature of the division.What’s funny is that many many many more fans would watch a super team than would check out.
The league wins if Giannis goes to LA.
Frankly, I don’t want to see it because I’m a butthurt Suns fan who hates the Fakers and only wants bad things to happen to them.