- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 91,438
- Reaction score
- 68,646
I don’t really care Russ.#1107 if you want to see for yourself.
I don’t really care Russ.#1107 if you want to see for yourself.
Who is crowning them? I don't see anybody doing that. Not wanting to be in that situation down the stretch and crowing them are two different things. They have experience bringing it home. We don't. So, naturally I would simply just not want to be in that situation. I would much rather see the Suns build the lead and hang on for dear life.A "leg up" is one thing, but to crown them the gods of all basketball is quite another. This board has followed the national narrative that even with our record, the Warriors are the "favorites" to win the title. Sorry, but I don't agree. If you want to make me out to be a homer, that's fine, but I'm not handing them the title just because some schmo at ESPN says we should.
NOTE: I'm using "you" in the general sense, not you personally.
I don’t really care Russ.
You said it wasn’t and I believed you.You asked if it was about you I'm showing you what post I mentioned.
Especially if literally tying your shoe gets blasted
Get what that you don't like the Warriors, don't like Draymond and so if anybody does like the Warriors or defends Draymond it bothers you? I've already conceded with the explanation given by another poster direct from the ref that I'm fine with the ejection. I wanted a better explanation he gave it, 2 flagrant 1's together equalled a 2.Especially if multiple members repeat the same thing over and over but someone still doesn't get it
Nor should it have been.The Flagrant Foul 2 on Draymond Green will not be reduced.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Increase it i say! Only joking @Russ Smith.
The Flagrant Foul 2 on Draymond Green will not be reduced.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Increase it i say! Only joking @Russ Smith.
For each Flagrant foul they receive, a player will rack up points. If a player has more than three Flagrant foul points, they will earn an automatic one-game suspension.
After they serve their suspension, a player's point total doesn't go to zero. So if they pick up another flagrant foul, they will earn more points and will have to then serve an automatic two-game suspension.
Here's how Flagrant foul points breakdown:
- Flagrant 1 = 1 point
- Flagrant 2 = 2 points
Yup - another TGiven the explanation from the ref that makes perfect sense.
I'm actually expecting a fine given how he left after it happened
Yup - another T
That video blows up WarriorFan's lame "he grabbed the jersey to keep him from falling" BS. He did grab up, but only after hitting him in the face and then PULLING HIM DOWN.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
That video blows up WarriorFan's lame "he grabbed the jersey to keep him from falling" BS. He did grab up, but only after hitting him in the face and then PULLING HIM DOWN.
Green is no different than PatBev, and neither should be in the NBA.
Seriously that's what you see?That video blows up WarriorFan's lame "he grabbed the jersey to keep him from falling" BS. He did grab up, but only after hitting him in the face and then PULLING HIM DOWN.
Green is no different than PatBev, and neither should be in the NBA.
He was nowhere close to the ball, wound up, and hit the face. He clearly pulled the jersey down. No other way to honestly view itSeriously that's what you see?
I see a guy that tried to block a shot but instead accidentaly hit the guy in his face, than tried to catch him before he hit hard on the ground.
Maybe you can call that a flagrant 1 - personally I don't even think it should be that, but that is consistent with the way they make calls nowadays.
No way in hell will anyone ever convince me that should be a flagrant 2 though. And I don't like Dramond, but fair is fair.
That's the same thing I saw but I was watching it on my shoe phone, what's your excuse?Seriously that's what you see?
I see a guy that tried to block a shot but instead accidentaly hit the guy in his face, than tried to catch him before he hit hard on the ground.
Maybe you can call that a flagrant 1 - personally I don't even think it should be that, but that is consistent with the way they make calls nowadays.
No way in hell will anyone ever convince me that should be a flagrant 2 though. And I don't like Dramond, but fair is fair.
Wow. I don't really care one way or the other, but that looked like a flagrant to me. He did not try for the ball, and he clearly pulled him down.Seriously that's what you see?
I see a guy that tried to block a shot but instead accidentaly hit the guy in his face, than tried to catch him before he hit hard on the ground.
Maybe you can call that a flagrant 1 - personally I don't even think it should be that, but that is consistent with the way they make calls nowadays.
No way in hell will anyone ever convince me that should be a flagrant 2 though. And I don't like Dramond, but fair is fair.