- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,165
- Reaction score
- 58,453
This is the interview Steve Kerr talked about the "Code" in the league.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
No, I wouldn't suspend him but yes, it should have been called a flagrant at the time. It wasn't accidental, maybe he legitimately fell there but as he did he drove himself forward so that he could make contact with Poole. But I'm not sure you want to revisit every single play, Memphis frequently goes too far but so do the Warriors.
Huh?Plus Poole shouldn’t have even been playing, since he came off the bench in the prior game
You’re out to lunch. It’s not a touch foul. He reaches out specifically for a leg they know is injured and pulls on it.The stupid thing about the Poole/Ja thing is it’s the SUPER slow-mo that makes it look “nefarious” and deliberate. In real time it’s a touch foul.
The warriors hate here is understandable considering this is a Suns forum, but this Poole conversation has reached ludicrous speed.
You’re out to lunch. It’s not a touch foul. He reaches out specifically for a leg they know is injured and pulls on it.
If Steph was playing with a bum knee and someone did that to him, you and Russ would be crying for a three game suspension.
I don't have any Warriors hate, I usually end up on the side of defending them (except when it involves Pachulia or Green). And I have no particular love for the Grizzlies other than a soft spot for their coach.The stupid thing about the Poole/Ja thing is it’s the SUPER slow-mo that makes it look “nefarious” and deliberate. In real time it’s a touch foul.
The warriors hate here is understandable considering this is a Suns forum, but this Poole conversation has reached ludicrous speed.
I'm not sure what "consistent" would mean here. Morant might be able to play, GP is out for awhile.4 points:
1. Poole was, indeed, initially "going for the ball"
2. while the hand was there, grabbing Ja's knee was Poole's instinctive defensive reaction to impede Ja's mobility on the play.
3. the degree of "pull" is significant, but it most likely aggravated the injury rather than caused it
4. the NBA just reviewed an incident in that series and suspended a player, so they need to be consistent.
Yeah it's two actions, maybe even three if you count the pull as a separate action following the grab. But the bump seems like a normal aggressive basketball play so I don't know why it is brought up.Again, look at the video replay on this tweet. The knee was bumped and then grabbed... two actions not just one.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Yeah it's two actions, maybe even three if you count the pull as a separate action following the grab. But the bump seems like a normal aggressive basketball play so I don't know why it is brought up.
The non-basketball play is the knee grab and pull and there doesn't need to be an injury for Poole to be penalized for the action.
It might have been but to me it looks like the result of normal aggressive play.It's brought up because the knee is pushed in two different directions.
If the knee grab is considered purposeful, why not consider the bump as well.
TBH, I would hope most of us could be fair enough if one of our players did the same.. dirty ish is dirty ish. No excuse for retaliation or however you want to justify it.. if you commit the crime, do the time.You’re out to lunch. It’s not a touch foul. He reaches out specifically for a leg they know is injured and pulls on it.
If Steph was playing with a bum knee and someone did that to him, you and Russ would be crying for a three game suspension.
Again, look at the video replay on this tweet. The knee was bumped and then grabbed... two actions not just one.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Yeah, knees bump during games in normal state of play.It might have been but to me it looks like the result of normal aggressive play.
The knee grab is unusual, the pull even more so. You see players doing that with the opponents arm all the time, trying to get them off balance or to convince the refs to make a bad call. So, I don't know why he did it, I just know he did grab the knee and he did pull the knee outward and that is not a basketball move whether it was intended to injure or not.
To clarify are you suggesting when Poole and Morant bump knees that's a flagrant foul?
I'm only looking at the video and seeing the knee was pushed in two different directions, initially by the bump and then the grab.
OK and I agree but you keep saying 2 actions so are you saying the bump of knees is a flagrant foul? My understanding in the Draymond one is the refs said there were 2 flagrants, the blow to the face, and the pulldown so that equals one flagrant 2. In this case for that to be comparable we need a second flagrant. I don't even agree there's one flagrant but if you concede the knee grab is flagrant, the knee bump would have to be too.
I will accept any ruling by the NBA. I'm simply commenting on what I saw in the video.
If I was going to say it was a flagrant foul, I would have already done so. I'm not shy about it.
I don't see how the grab to the knee alone is sufficient enough to injure it.
That’s the first video of the entire thing I’ve seen. That’s a purposeful grab and pull. From earlier action it seems a purposeful intent to “go at” an injured limb of an opponent (I agree that didn’t cause the initial pain, but it certainly could exacerbate something existing). Don’t think poole is dirty player, but he’s a young guy who may have just let what’s been going on in the series influence doing something dumb.Again, look at the video replay on this tweet. The knee was bumped and then grabbed... two actions not just one.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media