The Bourne Legacy

azsportsfan01

Registered
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Posts
2,199
Reaction score
1
Location
Bristol, CT
http://www.deadline.com/2011/04/universal-chooses-jeremy-renner-for-the-bourne-legacy/

The search is over. Universal Pictures has formally offered Jeremy Renner the lead role in the Tony Gilroy-directed The Bourne Legacy. Renner, who has been nominated for Oscars the past two years for his work in The Hurt Locker and The Town, is expected to sign on quickly to play a new character in the spinoff film that begins production in September. Like the Jason Bourne character played by Matt Damon in the first three The Bourne Identity thrillers, Renner will play an operative from a covert government program that is even more dangerous than the Treadstone brainwashing program that hatched Bourne.

"Legacy" is written and directed by Tony Gilroy (who wrote all three of the "Bourne" screenplays and also wrote and directed "Michael Clayton") and is expected to start filming this September, with a release date around August 2012.

Kinda surprised they chose Renner. He is already taking over the Mission Impossible franchise. Two franchises like this seems like an awful lot for one guy.
 

Gee!

BirdGang
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
26,222
Reaction score
25
Location
Gee From The G
A Bourne movie without Matt Damon as Jason Bourne sounds just as profitable as a Dumb and Dumber sequel without Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels... or a Mask sequel without Jim Carrey... etc., etc.,

That movie sucked with Jim Carrey and whats his face.. and the Mask.. Matter fact.. Anything with Jim Carrey sucks donkey balls..
 

Ghraxx

Newbie
Joined
Apr 3, 2011
Posts
30
Reaction score
0
I heard Leonardo Dicaprio for the role of Jason Bourne, guess they changed it.
 

coyoteshockeyfan

Fool In The Rain
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Posts
8,942
Reaction score
405
So they're saying it's a movie in the same universe as the other three, called The Bourne Legacy, but without Jason Bourne. This makes no sense!
 

Divide Et Impera

Registered User
Joined
Apr 7, 2003
Posts
14,395
Reaction score
2
Location
Maricopa, AZ
It could work. Renner's face is not angular enough, imo, to pull of the high-action spy character, but I think I'd give it a shot....
 

UncleChris

Shocking, I tell you!
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Posts
31,270
Reaction score
15,241
Location
Prescott, AZ
It looks to be pretty high energy. Even though Matt Damon will always be the franchise, I am willing to have an "in-theatre" look at this.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
67,789
Reaction score
35,627
Location
Las Vegas
I enjoyed it. Didn't care for the ending. But overall worth the 13.75 I payed to see it in Xtreme Digital!
 

UncleChris

Shocking, I tell you!
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Posts
31,270
Reaction score
15,241
Location
Prescott, AZ
I enjoyed it. Didn't care for the ending. But overall worth the 13.75 I payed to see it in Xtreme Digital!

In the previews, they seem to have endowed the lead character with some sort of super powers. Please tell me they didn't over do it on that....
 
OP
OP
Brian in Mesa

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
71,850
Reaction score
22,580
Location
Killjoy Central
The Bourne Legacy

Release Date: August 10, 2012
Studio: Universal Pictures
Director: Tony Gilroy
Screenwriter: Tony Gilroy, Dan Gilroy
Genre: Action, Thriller
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for violence and action sequences)
Website: TheBourneLegacy.net

Starring: Jeremy Renner, Rachel Weisz, Edward Norton, Albert Finney, Joan Allen, Scott Glenn, Stacy Keach, Oscar Isaac

Plot Summary: The narrative architect behind the "Bourne" film series, Tony Gilroy, takes the helm in the next chapter of the hugely popular espionage franchise that has earned almost $1 billion at the global box office: "The Bourne Legacy." The writer/director expands the "Bourne" universe created by Robert Ludlum with an original story that introduces us to a new hero (Jeremy Renner) whose life-or-death stakes have been triggered by the events of the first three films.

For "The Bourne Legacy," Renner joins fellow series newcomers Rachel Weisz, Edward Norton, Stacy Keach and Oscar Isaac, while franchise veterans Albert Finney, Joan Allen, David Strathairn and Scott Glenn reprise their roles.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
67,789
Reaction score
35,627
Location
Las Vegas
In the previews, they seem to have endowed the lead character with some sort of super powers. Please tell me they didn't over do it on that....

Not at all
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
45,888
Reaction score
16,178
Location
Round Rock, TX
Review I wrote for my movie review site:

THE BOURNE LEGACY

The 4th film of an already good trilogy is a tall order. Especially when the director and star of said trilogy is nowhere to be seen in this production.

What we have with The Bourne Legacy is two seemingly seperate films. You have the film that attempts to continue the story seen in the trilogy, and a brand new offshoot surrounding another of the drug-enhanced super soldiers.

In order to follow that first of the two movies, it might do well to view The Bourne Ultimatum. It is absolutely a must to have seen at least that last film, if not the whole trilogy, otherwise a good third of the film will make no sense at all. I have seen the whole trilogy, but haven't seen the third film in quite some time, and I had some issues following things surrounding "Treadstone" and "Blackbriar". Characters from the previous films do appear, but only for fleeting moments and usually with huge gaps, thanks to the second piece of the film.

That piece is about Aaron Cross, an agent that seems to be an exact duplicate of Jason Bourne, except in this case, he knows who he is and what he does. He spends the entire movie trying to track down drugs that allow him to operate with enhanced strength and intelligence. That's it.

The problem is that these two halves of The Bourne Legacy whole, only vaguely fit together. Cross simply seems like an excuse to have action sequences amidst all the political and military conspiracy stuff.

Now don't get me wrong, those action sequences are exhilirating, but a little long. There really are only 3 of these sequences, one in Alaska, one in the back roads of Virginia and the last in the crowded streets of Manila, the Philippines. The final sequence ends spectacularly, but it takes a really long time to get to that point.

The cast is uniformly great, especially Renner, Rachel Weisz as the helpful scientist, and Edward Norton as the government agent who will stop at nothing to find Cross and bring him in--effectively destroying the original program that led to the Bourne mess in the earlier films.

Bourne himself is always present, always mentioned, but it seemed to be only to remind the audience that, yes, this is a Bourne movie! We see pictures of Bourne and everyone talks about him. It's certainly anticlimactic that he doesn't actually appear on screen after being the center of everything.

Finally, the ending also is so abrupt that I didn't even realize the film was over until I started hearing the pulsating strings of Moby's Extreme Ways, remixed yet again over the end credits. Not only was it an unsatisfying ending that most certainly leads to a fifth film, but it felt like the entire movie had no ending at all. Even the 3rd and final action set piece didn't feel like an epic ending.

All in all, it was an incomplete film that had some moments and was technically great. Cinematography was actually better than the previous film (no Blair Witch shakiness) and the acting was still of the highest quality. But it's hard to whole-heartedly recommend the film, and I definitely can't recommend it if you haven't seen the previous films.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,293
Reaction score
22,762
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
This was a wholly underwhelming film, and I'm sorry to have broken my vow not to see it. It was too much of a mish-mash, a jumble of the original trilogy (as Chap said, mostly the last one), back story, and setup. I think they made a huge mistake by not really making this a stand-alone movie. It was far too long for what it was--a simple placeholder that did nothing but set the plate for sequels. And, what is worse, they didn't even TRY to make it anything more.

The climax, with Renner infecting himself with the virus, he and Weisz eluding the police and killing the assassin introduced entirely too late into the movie, and hopping on a fishing vessel, was simply terrible.
 

UncleChris

Shocking, I tell you!
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Posts
31,270
Reaction score
15,241
Location
Prescott, AZ
I enjoyed it. Didn't care for the ending. But overall worth the 13.75 I payed to see it in Xtreme Digital!

Gah!!! Once again, DITTO and DITTO, sir! :D


I'll assume there will be sequels, so hopefully they can get beyond the melding of the new and old movies and just do their own thing. The film was in-TENSE, in spots... loved that. But as Shane and others have pointed out the ending was a, "what? Huh?" kind of ending.

p.s. I didn't think much of the way they handled Pamela Landy....
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
547,634
Posts
5,352,333
Members
6,304
Latest member
Dbacks05
Top