The Dark Knight

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
We aren't talking about the main character, we are talking about a supporting character.
Shouldn't that make it more acceptable rather than less?


You don't always change just because someone does it better. That can be one of the reasons, but it breaks up continuity. I didn't think KH was bad enough to warrant a change.
I disagree on both counts.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,782
Reaction score
15,887
Location
Arizona
If you are out to make the best movie you can possibly make, you have to accept that there may be changes. It could have been something where KH decided not to be in the movie, or Nolan decided he didn't want her. There could be any number of reasons.

And Katie Holmes being "good" in the first movie is definitely subjective. I personally don't think she was very "good" at all in the first movie. Certainly not believable as an assistant DA.

:thumbup: She wasn't bad either. Just not believable as an assistant DA. If they had kept her as just the ex-girlfriend and not tried to make her an assistant DA, I could have bought that much more.

Its a movie Chap and she was just as believable as Gyllenhal. And my point was besides the continuity of the first film, KH is believable as an assistant DA that a rich powerful guy WOULD ACTUALLY BE IN LOVE WITH! Not some half ass kind of sort off decent looking girl, why the hell can't the Assistant DA be a hot girl? Really?

That's the problem. KH was nowhere near as believable as MG. Katie came off like some ex-high school girlfriend with a crush. Not an assistant DA by any stretch. She had known Bruce since they were kids. So you didn't need to make her an Assistant DA to establish the connection between characters.

There is nothing wrong with finding a hot girl was some really strong acting skills. There are very few and KH is not one of them. Given a choice, I would take a less attractive character with strong acting skills then the other way around. If Rachel's character was really about eye candy then they would have had her parading around in underwear or a swimsuit for a scene or two.

I don't know. I think George Clooney, er, Val Kilmer...I mean Michael Keaton, oh, sorry, Adam West...yeah, Adam West might not really fit the part anymore.

If you can get someone better, you do. They did.

:thumbup:

You don't always change just because someone does it better. That can be one of the reasons, but it breaks up continuity. I didn't think KH was bad enough to warrant a change.

You don't have to but you can. If you can, then I don't see why not. KH wasn't awful but MG was better. It doesn't break up continuity when actors change. It breaks up continuity for me if the character goes through a radical change.
 
Last edited:

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,924
You don't have to but you can. If you can, then I don't see why not. KH wasn't awful but MG was better. It doesn't break up continuity when actors change. It breaks up continuity for me if the character goes through a radical change.

Maybe not to you. I think actors break up continuity.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
It's not a TV show. There are years in between films.

I don't think the actors make much of a difference as long as they do it well.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,782
Reaction score
15,887
Location
Arizona
Maybe not to you. I think actors break up continuity.

I am glad I don't see it that way. I would have had to stop watching James Bond, Doctor Who, the previous Batman films (though the writing should have stopped me) and some other examples I can't think of off the top of my head.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,924
She chose not to be in the movie so this is pointless.

Actors choice or directors choice doesn't matter to me, it doesn't mean that there isn't a continuty change...


I am glad I don't see it that way. I would have had to stop watching James Bond, Doctor Who, the previous Batman films (though the writing should have stopped me) and some other examples I can't think of off the top of my head.

Continuity changes alone won't stop me from seeing movies. I love all of the Bond movies for example. I love The Dark Knight. I would have just rathered KH than MG because of that continuity.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,782
Reaction score
15,887
Location
Arizona
Actors choice or directors choice doesn't matter to me, it doesn't mean that there isn't a continuty change...

Continuity changes alone won't stop me from seeing movies. I love all of the Bond movies for example. I love The Dark Knight. I would have just rathered KH than MG because of that continuity.

It would for me depending on the depth of the change. In this case I didn't miss KH at all and thought MG was great. When I find myself being into the character regardless of who the actor is, there is no continuity issue.

I guess it all depends on ones point of view on continuity.
 

nashman

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 3, 2007
Posts
10,982
Reaction score
8,162
Location
Queen Creek, AZ
Wow DCR you can disagree with Pariah and he doesn't call you a shallow cornholio! Mods that was totally uncalled for from Pariah I think a BAN is in order for such childish name calling because he disagrees with someone. Anyway you can all agree or disagree its a freaking messageboard for opinions, do you GET that Pariah? Or when someone you don't agree with says something you have to turn into a child and start spouting off insults? If you want Pariah you can PM me and we could arrange to see how big an cornholio I am tuffguy.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,782
Reaction score
15,887
Location
Arizona
Wow DCR you can disagree with Pariah and he doesn't call you a shallow cornholio! Mods that was totally uncalled for from Pariah I think a BAN is in order for such childish name calling because he disagrees with someone. Anyway you can all agree or disagree its a freaking messageboard for opinions, do you GET that Pariah? Or when someone you don't agree with says something you have to turn into a child and start spouting off insults? If you want Pariah you can PM me and we could arrange to see how big an cornholio I am tuffguy.

Hey nashman. Way to rise above it man! Regardless of anybody else's actions you probably just guaranteed a ban for yourself too.

:mulli:
 

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
How did this guy NOT get the vacated seat on At the Movies?
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,924
What did I say? I did not insult him I just said if he wanted to PM me we could arrange something?

Come on nashman, it was a classic internet threat.

Besides, people that meet me think I am an cornholio, so I'm ok with being called one. :D
 

nashman

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 3, 2007
Posts
10,982
Reaction score
8,162
Location
Queen Creek, AZ
Whatever I have been banned for calling names it pisses me off that a few can do whatever they want it seems without any reprocussions. Pariah is entitled to his opinion as am I and lots of people would agree with both, no reason for him to call someone a shallow cornholio. I think most people can see who the cornholio is by his childish actions!
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
If you want Pariah you can PM me and we could arrange to see how big an cornholio I am tuffguy.
lol. "tuff guy." I'm not the one making threats.

Look me up next time you're in Denver.

And, for the record, I'm all for people having different opinions. But most people don't come across as abrasive as you do when they talk about them. You're talking in absolutes again, leaving no room for others to have their opinion. Plus, by capping the shallow portion of your offending post (seriously, how could someone with money like a girl that looks like MG...yukkers), you didn't do yourself any favors in the nice-guy department.

So, if it's a banning, I'm cool with that. But don't foist it all on me (but I'm a "tuffguy," I can take it). Take a look in the mirror and ask yourself why you invoke these reactions on the board.
 
Last edited:

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
Also Katie Holmes was offerred to reprise her role and she declined.
 

nashman

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 3, 2007
Posts
10,982
Reaction score
8,162
Location
Queen Creek, AZ
Pariah
Look me up next time you're in Denver.

No problem cornholio I will keep that in mind!

And you are seemingly one of the very few that I envoke apparently because I have had NO problems in along time. But you seem to like to be a jerk so go ahead and do your thing. As far as me being a nice guy what the heck does that have to do with anything. I can say someone is not attractive compared to someone else it doesn't make me shallow its once again called an OPINION, that word really must be hard for you to grasp. I am not sure how my opinion on the KH and MG subject envoked you but you seem to have some issues.
 
Last edited:

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,107
Posts
5,433,280
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top