First off, happy holidays to everyone. I've been away and missed chattin with you all about the Glaus trade.
As for old news, I've read through most the posts and it still seems that some people were dissapointed after the Javy trade (because they thought we could have got either Garland or McCarthy). IMO, the Garland extension is a sign that he was untouchable as the Sox were prob trying to extend him before or during the Javy trade. As for McCarthy, if Byrnes could have got him he would have. There's no logical way Chicago would trade us McCarthy (who's cheap, effective, and young) for Javy. We have to remember that Javy really isn't that good and he will serve up a lot of home runs in Cellular Field. We got a great CF prospect, immediate bullpen help, and one year SP solution in El Duque. I think Byrnes did great
.
The Glaus trade I'm still a little skeptical about but it addressed one of our major needs for the '06 offseason- MONEY! It's hard to tell if we could have got a better trade elsewhere but I'm thinking we couldn't. If we could have got Clement or Arroyo, you have to think Byrnes would have done it.
The positives of this trade are:
1) There's 33.5 million of them
2) We didn't have to throw in any money (I'm pretty sure but could be wrong).
3) Our defense got a major boost up middle (plus he's very cheap)
4) We added a decent bat who will only get better with good coaching and more discipline.
5) A decent arm in Batista, whether it's in the pen or the rotation. Plus, he's a great clubhouse guy and will provide great veteran presence.
6) We'll be able to sign Tracy to an extension
7) We can cancel our Upton Fund- WE NOW HAVE MORE MONEY TO SIGN UPTON!!!!
-We can sign 1 or 2 frontline SP's next offseason by the likes of Zito or Schmidt.
Negatives:
1) We lose major power in our lineup coupled with not bringing in a above avg starting pitcher.
2) We had to trade a top-10 prospect in Santos- I'm all for trading him as he has no role in our system anymore but I think we could have used him in another trade to address some of our other needs.
Overall, I don't mind this trade because of the financial reasons but I think we could have done a little better (Clement or Arroyo). There have been some posts saying we could have got Clement and Papylbon or Lester which is absurd. Or saying Glaus has similar trade value to that of Manny or Tejada is borderline insane. Those guys are 1st ballot HOFers and Glaus won't ever sniff striking out less than 100 times while barely batting his weight. Glaus, just like Javy, are not that good and are very expensive. Byrnes did a great job getting teams to take on those contracts (with little money thrown in) while getting decent value in return