The Evolution of the Arizona Cardinals

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
What we are starting to see is a striking evolution of what could well be a perennial NFL stalwart in Arizona. Prior to Ken Whisenhunt's arrival, the Cardinals often had some pretty decent talent to work with...and, at times, they would put forth some very aggressive one or two game efforts and would pull off the occasional upset, but, they could never seem to sustain the same intensity from week to week. They could win a big game at home and then easily get blown out the next game. Why was this?

It comes down to strength and conditioning...and the coaching that stresses the two.

The most important two things Ken Whisenhunt did the moment he was hired is convince the Bidwills to build a high-caliber training facility, and then hire strength and conditioning coach extraordinaire, John Lott.

The Cardinal teams of the past could muster up the aggressiveness to play super hard for one game, but stacking such efforts was not going to happen in the old culture because the players were not properly trained to handle the physcial pounding of the game.

We have debated at length over the merits of Ken Whisenhunt's first draft decisions...and, in particular, many have questioned his very first selection in T Levi Brown, a big mauler of a tackle from Penn. St.

However, in retrospect, from a symbolic standpoint, Whiz did a very smart thing...not only by starting to build strength on the offensive line, but then by trading up in the early portion of the second round to draft DT Alan Branch.

Sure, we can argue that both Brown and Branch have taken a while to develop and perhaps that neither one of them is still quite where we would have hoped he'd be, with regard to production and consistency. But, these two players right now epitomize the evolution that has begun to take firm roots in Glendale...because, they are both physical players and because they have helped to make both sides of the Cardinals' lines more physical. Perfect, no. More physcial, yes.

The fact that both lines are more physical is the main reason why this year, despite a 1-2 start, the team finished 10-6, and registered big wins that rarely ever happened before, such as beating up on the Giants in New York and pounding the Vikings at home.

It's very interesting to see how different this year's Cardinal team is from last year's. Last year's team could barely run the ball, it thrived on big plays in the passing game. Quite frankly last year's defense was a poor tackling and pass coverage unit that could not hold up at all on the road, save the stunning upset at Carolina in the second round of the playoffs. In addition, the special teams, which often are an indication of the kind of young talent and depth that a team has on its roster, were subpar at best.

This year's team hasn't needed big play passes to win games. In fact, they really haven't gotten any. Suddenly this offense has more than a modicum of balance, suddenly there is a running game that defensive coordinators have to account for. On the other side of the ball, the play in general has been far more physical, and the tackling and pass coverage have improved significantly. The special teams have---more often than not---been special---really for the first time in eons.

Where we as fans really need to tip our hats is to Whiz, of course, for getting all these wheels in motion...but we also need to heap praise on the coaching staff...and, without question, the unsung hero in all of this is John Lott. He has helped turn these players into tough, hard-minded and strong-bodied competitors---players that can control the line of scrimmage, and thus give the team the best chance to win in any environment.

Look, for example, at Lott's influence on the offense---and let's remember that this off-season last year was five weeks shorter than normal. The interior three of LG Reggie Wells, C Lyle Sendlien and RG Deuce Lutui, have played good, tough, physical football every game this season. They have been about as consistent as the interior of an offensive line can be...and it wasn't too long ago that Wells looked far too overmatched at guard, Sendlein looked a little too small and too far reliant on finesse, and Lutui was too overweight, undisciplined and underconditioned to hold up consistently well.

Look at what Lott did with Beanie Wells...he got him to lose twenty pounds of fat and turned it into muscle and in the process made Wells faster, tougher and more dynamic.

And you can see the fruits of Lott's labor in young players like WR Early Doucet who looks much stronger on his feet and in his play this year.

On the defensive side of the ball, the emergence of Calais Campbell and Alan Branch has been striking...as, to a somewhat lesser degree the improved strength and quickness of Kenny Iwebema, whose progress was delayed by major surgery during a portion of the off-season.

One player who has stood out in terms of strength and conditioning has been LB Clark Haggans. Haggans, a 10 year veteran coming off an injury plagued inaugural season with the team where he ended up on the IR for the last 5 games and all 4 playoffs games, has played with exemplary strength and bounce this season, and has been, by far, the most consistent linebacker on the team. He's also provided for the team an outside pass rushing threat---something this team has desperately needed.

Look at Antrel Rolle...he's never tackled as hard and well as he has this year. For that matter, he has never covered nearly as well either...or shown the same speed and range. Suddenly he is looking like a potential Pro Bowler at FS, a mere year after showing a slow transistion there.

And, the coup de grace really is the recent sentiment from Larry Fitzgerald after he got rolled up in the MNF game at San Francisco...Fitz lauded John Lott afterward when he let everyone know that the doctor examining his leg told him that if his legs weren't so chiseled he would likely have suffered a major injury.

Whiz saw first hand all the reasons why the Steelers are perennial NFL stalwarts. They play tough, hard-nosed football...that all begins and ends with what the players do in the training facility.

Thus, this is what we are seeing evolve before our eyes. Heck, the Steelers were the ones who suffered the Super Bowl hangover, and not the Cardinals. In fact, the way the Cardinals played on the road this year, these Cardinals were significantly better than last year's team, and significantly more physical.

I think the truest test of this evolution came following the Tennessee game, which was one of the more physcial games the Cardinals have played in quite some time. Players were laying it on the line in that game, and quite frankly, from a physcial standpoint---they deserved the win---which could have made them 7-1 on the road this year. I remember feeling very uneasy about the Cardinals' prospects in the next game at home versus Minnesota...were you wondering the same? Plus, the heartbreak factor of losing on the last play of a game that the players fought tooth and nail for was potentially demoralizing.

The toughest thing for a football player is dealing with all the aches and pains especially after putting it all on the ine and yet having to suffer through a loss. The aches and pains are far more tolerable after a win. Either way, it's not easy to dig right back in and take on the next pounding.

Cardinal teams of the past after a heartbreak like the Tennessee would have rolled over for a couple games. Not these Cardinals. They came out and they pounded on the Vikings, and that's when the evolution of this team, under the watchful leadership of Ken Whisenhunt and S&C guru, John Lott, was starting to make itself entirely evident.

As long as Whiz and Lott stay---and I strongly believe they are like Lennon and McCartney---the band won't be the same if they are apart---it looks like we finally do have a winner in Arizona.

The fact that they've done it so quickly (8-8, 9-7 (12-8), 10-6) suggests to me that the best is yet to come.
 
Last edited:

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,053
Reaction score
7,895
Location
Scottsdale
Sorry Mitch... just can't get there when the stench of 2 losses to the 9ers, a smack down to the Colts (at Home), another pounding of a loss to the Panthers (at Home), a squeaker of a win in Detroit and a no-show to end the season against the Packers...

Are we tougher? I dunno... I'm not really sold on that notion at all. Perhaps we can make that arguement from a purely physical point of view... You make solid points about the o-line playing so many games and the fact that we didn't require any big pass plays to win games this year. However, "tough" to me means more than being physically strong. In fact, in the NFL I believe it's more important to be mentally "tough", as anyone who reaches the NFL is a physical specimen... but what lies between the ears is usually the difference maker. And IMHO, this is where the Cards still suffer, greatly...
 

NeverSayDieFan

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Posts
2,864
Reaction score
210
ALWAYS ENJOY your posts, Mitch...

There is NO DOUBT in mind that this team is DRAMATICALLY different from Cardinal teams of the Past. I could make several points BUT I'll sum it up in ONE! After all, sometimes LESS is MORE! ;) We DID NOT lose back-to-back games ALL YEAR!! That to me speaks volumes. The NFL demands resiliency! How do you play AFTER a bad call??; How do you ADJUST if you DON'T have your BIG GUNS for the game??; How do you handle it emotionally if you fumble it away and are suddenly 7 pts. down!. I think TALENT gives you the opportunity to WIN...BUT HEART, DETERMINATION, SACRIFICE...the un-measurables...often decide the out-come! GO CARDS! :D
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,209
Reaction score
14,156
one thing about perennial NFL stalwarts --

they all have had good QB situations.

Pats: Bledsoe to Brady seamlessly
Cots: Manning
Eagles: McNabb
Chargers: Brees to Rivers, seamlessly
Steelers: Ben R

a good coaching staff + a good scouting department+ good QB play year to year means that year in and year out -- the team will have a chance.

i think the Cardinals have the first two.

What happens after Warner retires remains to be seen. I don't think they will go back to 5-11 year after year -- but I am not sure if they will become the team where you are surprised if they don't make the playoffs.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,143
Reaction score
5,201
Location
Nashville TN.
The bounce back win against the Vikes after the Titan game was all of the mental toughness I needed to see.

Don't know how far they will go in the playoffs but these Cardinals are way different from years past.
 

gnomepete

Registered
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
325
Reaction score
0
Location
WV
Mitch,

I don't often post, but I wanted to thank you for your posts. You give insights I don't have the knowledge/experience/time/whatever to come up with myself. Thanks again.

Pete
 

English on tour

Eng-gur-land Eng-gur-land
Joined
Sep 4, 2004
Posts
4,263
Reaction score
49
Location
Whitley Bay, England
Mitch,

I don't often post, but I wanted to thank you for your posts. You give insights I don't have the knowledge/experience/time/whatever to come up with myself. Thanks again.

Pete

hey Mitch, you still got the two accounts ;)

really though Pete, I couldnt agree more mate. Always a good read is Mitch :notworthy
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,297
Reaction score
1,171
Location
SE Valley
Look, for example, at Lott's influence on the offense---and let's remember that this off-season last year was five weeks shorter than normal. The interior three of LG Reggie Wells, C Lyle Sendlien and RG Deuce Lutui, have played good, tough, physical football every game this season. They have been about as consistent as the interior of an offensive line can be...and it wasn't too long ago that Wells looked far too overmatched at guard, Sendlein looked a little too small and too far reliant on finesse, and Lutui was too overweight, undisciplined and underconditioned to hold up consistently well.
Yep. I can't recall seeing an offensive lineman 4 yards into the backfield this year!
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
68,713
Reaction score
37,918
Location
Las Vegas
To many people greatly over rate John Lott. Greatly greatly over rate him. I like him and want to keep him but let's not get carried away he's not even close to irreplaceable.
 
Last edited:

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,327
Reaction score
29,649
Location
Gilbert, AZ
To many people greatly over rate John Lott. Greatly greatly over rate him. I like him and want to keep him but let's not at all irreplaceable.

This.

The Cards have been successful the last two seasons because they've been remarkably healthy. Some of that has to do with John Lott the person. It also has to do with new training equipment that the team invested in. It also has to do with a franchise-wide focus on full participation in the offseason activities, and part of that has to do with veteran leadership that holds players accountable.

Adrian Wilson, Karlos Dansby (who participated in full despite carrying the Franchise tag two seasons running), Larry Fitzgerald, etc. deserve just as much credit as Mr. Lott.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
This.

The Cards have been successful the last two seasons because they've been remarkably healthy. Some of that has to do with John Lott the person. It also has to do with new training equipment that the team invested in. It also has to do with a franchise-wide focus on full participation in the offseason activities, and part of that has to do with veteran leadership that holds players accountable.

Adrian Wilson, Karlos Dansby (who participated in full despite carrying the Franchise tag two seasons running), Larry Fitzgerald, etc. deserve just as much credit as Mr. Lott.

Wait a minute. Dansby is an overrated slacker who only plays in contract years and can't wait to get out of town and is only interested in a huge payday.

;)
 

Hollywood

is part black.
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Posts
8,247
Reaction score
1,015
Location
Mesa, Arizona, USA, Planet Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
This.

The Cards have been successful the last two seasons because they've been remarkably healthy. Some of that has to do with John Lott the person. It also has to do with new training equipment that the team invested in. It also has to do with a franchise-wide focus on full participation in the offseason activities, and part of that has to do with veteran leadership that holds players accountable.

Adrian Wilson, Karlos Dansby (who participated in full despite carrying the Franchise tag two seasons running), Larry Fitzgerald, etc. deserve just as much credit as Mr. Lott.
I don't know about this. I think Lott is directly responsible for getting the players to ute the equipment to the fullest. And that in turn is not only keeping players from getting hurt it is speeding the recovery time of those that do get hurt.
 

vince56

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
9,068
Reaction score
2,258
Location
Arizona
Mitch, I have to be honest I'm usually not a fan of what you write, but this is a good piece with a fresh and original opinion. Kudos to a great article I actually really enjoyed reading.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,297
Reaction score
1,171
Location
SE Valley
Huh?? Do the names Gandy and Brown ring a bell??
:rolleyes: It's obvious that as a function of technique the offensive tackles riding the defender around the pocket will be 4 yards or more behind the line of scrimmage.

Perhaps I should have made myself clearer...

Interior lineman - due to being knocked back by a defender.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,053
Reaction score
7,895
Location
Scottsdale
:rolleyes: It's obvious that as a function of technique the offensive tackles riding the defender around the pocket will be 4 yards or more behind the line of scrimmage.

Perhaps I should have made myself clearer...

Interior lineman - due to being knocked back by a defender.


Brown and Gandy were in the backfield many times not because of technique... sadly.
But toally agree with you regarding the interior linemen. ;)
 

SoCal Cardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
6,056
Reaction score
1,296
Ok, I have heard enough people talk about how great Lott is (including more than a few players) So I'm not doubting his worth at all.

My question is.. WHAT is it that makes him the talk of the town?
Is he a great motivator?
Does he have really effective routines that no one else in the business is privy to?

Unless it's mostly the first of the two, I really don't see any reason a disciple of his couldn't accomplish the same things.
 

mrbyte

Be careful what you wish for.
Joined
Sep 5, 2008
Posts
649
Reaction score
18
Location
Coventry, England
Great post Mitch,
Though you hale the lack of the big play as a positive thing. I see it as a negative thing because we will really need it in the playoffs and as we have seemingly lost the big play so teams have become that little less fearful of our offence.
I think what i'm saying is I would like to see the spectacular back in the offence along with the newly found running game. We seemed to have paid for the run with the loss of the long play.
 

Hollywood

is part black.
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Posts
8,247
Reaction score
1,015
Location
Mesa, Arizona, USA, Planet Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Ok, I have heard enough people talk about how great Lott is (including more than a few players) So I'm not doubting his worth at all.

My question is.. WHAT is it that makes him the talk of the town?
Is he a great motivator?
Does he have really effective routines that no one else in the business is privy to?

Unless it's mostly the first of the two, I really don't see any reason a disciple of his couldn't accomplish the same things.
I think it was his first year here that Lott was picked to be the weight coach at the combine. Many of the players there increased their 'max' that week and credited it to Lott. He is an incredable motivator. I think that Fitz was reciently quoted in an article as saying that it is not possible for players to skip out on the weight training because Lott will hunt them down.

Years ago I remember talking to a friend that was trying to use "we have been hit hard by injuries" as a reason for that seasons failure. I asked why we always seem to be hit hard by injuries. It was a yearly occurance. We decided that it wasn't bad luck, it couldn't be. Nobody's luck is that bad that long. We figured that other teams are physically better prepared for the meat grinder that is the NFL. And THAT is coaching. Specifically the strength and conditioning coach.

That is why I say losing Lott would be a big blow to the team.
 

Vermont Maverick

Registered
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
1,861
Reaction score
181
Location
Williston, Vermont
Huh?? Do the names Gandy and Brown ring a bell??

I've watched Levi get beat bad in the pass game but he is a damn good run blocker. You name ONE running play where Brown is 4 yards into the backfield. ONE. (That is what "4 yards into the backfield" implies)

Good to have guys like you around to either find negatives, or if you need to support your case, simply manufacture them.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,297
Reaction score
1,171
Location
SE Valley
I've watched Levi get beat bad in the pass game but he is a damn good run blocker. You name ONE running play where Brown is 4 yards into the backfield. ONE. (That is what "4 yards into the backfield" implies)

Good to have guys like you around to either find negatives, or if you need to support your case, simply manufacture them.
:thumbup: Good post Mav.
 

DemsMyBoys

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Posts
12,375
Reaction score
4,656
Location
Cave Creek
Thanks Mitch. I'm always trying to learn more about the game so you know I appreciate what you have to say.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,241
Posts
5,396,818
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top