The Garnett Breakdown - Is it Worth an extra 15 - 30 Million Dollars?

hsandhu

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
2,485
Reaction score
197
I would like to first say I realize there is a next to zero percent chance of
what I'm proposing actually happening, but there has been a lot of discussion about it, and I've done quite a bit of thinking, so let me share my thoughts.

Ok, so I've been thinking the last couple of days of all possible scenarios of how to make the garnett puzzle work, in terms of a trade that works for all parties, and more importantly a financial situation that works for the suns. The latter is the difficult part, but I've broken it down to the following question:

Is a possible dynasty worth 15 - 30 million dollars?

I will detail the premise behind the above question in the following post.


Trade Proposal: Shawn Marion, James Jones (dump
some salary), both number ones this year, atlanta's future number one for Kevin
Garnett.

Thoughts

1)The suns are in a unique postion where they have enough assets in terms of players, picks to make a deal happen, and still have a tremendous team after the deal.


2) I'm not sure what would be more valuable to minny, next years atlanta pick or barbosa. Ultimately if it takes barbosa in place of the atlanta pick, the suns
should still do it but push to keep barbosa vs. the pick. Thus when the window for this title run closes the stoudemire/diaw/barbosa (the YOUNG core) window will open, allowing sustained excellence.

2) Why would minny do this deal? Maybe they can turn around as part of a three way, move marion to toronto/chicago (i know toronto is under the cap so that trade will work) for the number one/two pick, players or a combination. I think BC would take marion over the 1, since there isn't a can't miss prospect. Minny ends up w/ possible 1, 6, 21, 27 in this years draft, and around 6-8 (lets be nice to atlanta, although they may lose harrington) and 6-8 (their own pick) in next years draft. Assuming they get only picks and no young players. That added to mccants is a hell of a way to start rebuilding a dying franchise.

3) From the suns standpoint, garnett makes the suns better, period. His freakish length makes him a more versatile defender than marion, plus he is just a better defender. He doesn't contain people, he can shut people down. He can board as well as shawn. And most importantly, his offensive game is light years ahead of shawn's. He can create his own shot, and if the team dumps the ball to kg in a half court set and says "get us a score" he can do it. Something marion can't do (which is my biggest gripe with him, despite the fact i appreciate all he does).

And garnett will have no problem deffering, he got criticized for deferring to guys like wally, he'll have no issue doing it to superstars like amare if it means winning.

The Following is the Big Issue

4) The big problem is the suns financial situation. This upcoming year will be ok, as the payroll in my scenario is around 65. This is with everybody picking up their player option, kurt on the roster, and resigning tt on the very cheap (2 mill). If pressed, kurt can be moved to up tt to something more reasonable (4 million), keeping you at or below the luxury threshold. So next year the team is below the threshold, and is (knock on wood, pray to god barring injury) a ridiculous favorite to take the whole thing.

The following two years get dicey. (I'm assuming kurt is moved after 06/07. )Assuming Boris extends for 5/49 (8 million first year base, with 10.5% increment raise), and barbosa extends for 5/30, the payroll for 06/07 will be 64 and 07/08 70 for the core 6 players (kg, amare,diaw, bell, nash, barbosa). Those core 6 should be good enough to be title favorites for those two years as well. Lets assume you can fill out the
remaining 6 spots on the cheap, for 5 million, that leaves you at 69 for 06/07
75 for 07/08.

This is where I think the garnett idea gets in trouble, as you are around 5 million over the luxury threshold in 06/07, 10 million in 07/08 (let's assume the threshold raises a million each year).

However, i personally believe this 2 year hit, is definitely worth it (easy to say, not my money). I don't know that sarver is the type of guy who believes it is, but we don't even know if the tax will kick in those years, and if it does/doesn't isn't a two year financial hit worth a three year run built around a deadly core 6 where you will be a very strong favorite to win a title each of those 3 years.

Also an aside, if minny insists on barbosa instead of next year's atlanta it
will be cheaper, as leandro will be on an extension, the rook will be on a
rookie contract.

5) After 07/08, kg comes off the books, will be 33, and hopefully after winning
a couple titles with the suns and already having made 200 million + in career
salary, wont mind something like a three year 24 million contract. Thus in 08/09 that core 6 will be around 57 million, the following year nash/raja come off the books (maybe nash retires, maybe comes back on the cheap), anyway the core 4/5/6 then goes to around 42/48/54 million. And after kg/nash/bell retire/move on, amare/diaw/barbosa will be the core you build around.

That is a 5-7 year run where you have a core of nash/bell/diaw/amare/kg/leandro,
and 4-5 years following where you have amare/diaw/leandro. Again, knock on wood
(because it always happens to the suns), the team will win how many titles
during that run? The big cost for that run is the two financial hits you take
in 06/07 and 07/08, I think it's worth it. If the suns want to remain no higher
than the luxury threshold, those two years may cost you anywhere from 15-30
(assuming a tax) million dollars more than that luxury threshold.

The ultimate question is, is 15-30 million something you'll want to pay for a
strong chance to win multiple titles.

p.s.: if you are just moving marion out, and bringing kg in, i think the great
chemistry we saw with this years team on and specifically off the court will
stay in tact.
 
Last edited:

asudevil83

Registered User
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Posts
2,061
Reaction score
1
let me just first say that this is the second time writing this out because the board made me relogin after hitting submit.:devil:

so i'm just going to make this quick. its technically possible to get Garnett and not be killed cap wise too bad for the next couple of years.

1.) trade Marion/Barbosa/Atlanta's pick for Garnett
2.) trade KT and Jones and get PJ Brown and Steven Blake in return.

we could then resign TT to a 3 year $12mil contract ($3.5, $4, $4.5), draft Collins with the #21 and a big man (Sene, Armstrong, Davis) with the #27. use the remaining part of the MLE to get a backup SF. i dont have one off hand, and i'm not in the mood to look.

Amare/Brown/Grant
Diaw/TT
Garnett/Skita
Bell/Collins
Nash/Blake

House isnt coming back, and i would hope that we could buy out Burke, and even trade or buy out Grant.

06/07 payroll - $64.2mil and 11 players
07/08 payroll - $67.5mil and 9 players
 

Chris_Sanders

Arizona Sports Simp
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
41,017
Reaction score
33,415
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Minnesota isn't going to trade Garnett for a salary albatross (though a very good one), a bit roleplayer, two bad picks in a bad draft, and the potential of one good pick.

If you want to talk Garnett, you have to think Marion + Diaw with Diaw being what Minnesota would actually want in the trade. If they are going to get rid of Garnett and rebuild, I can't see them taking Marion's salary without getting something REALLY valuable out of it.
 

NastyOne

Suns 4 Life...Probably...Maybe
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
520
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte
Chris_Sanders said:
Minnesota isn't going to trade Garnett for a salary albatross (though a very good one), a bit roleplayer, two bad picks in a bad draft, and the potential of one good pick.

If you want to talk Garnett, you have to think Marion + Diaw with Diaw being what Minnesota would actually want in the trade. If they are going to get rid of Garnett and rebuild, I can't see them taking Marion's salary without getting something REALLY valuable out of it.

If they move KG i don't think they want any big contracts at all.

Minnesota would want to rebuild, and you can't do that by moving KG for a max player.

Suns and Wolves would have to get a third team with caproom involved where that third team would send young good players to minny and we would send them Marion in return.

Only teams that come to mind are Chicago and Toronto.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
H

hsandhu

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
2,485
Reaction score
197
Yeah, that's exactly what I stated in my post, as I too don't believe minnesota would want marion. I threw the idea of toronto and the #1 pick, chicago and the #2/and or players.

Minnesota is going nowhere, they need to tear down and get lots of young players/picks which they can start something with.
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
17,100
Reaction score
7,858
Chris_Sanders said:
Minnesota isn't going to trade Garnett for a salary albatross (though a very good one), a bit roleplayer, two bad picks in a bad draft, and the potential of one good pick.

If you want to talk Garnett, you have to think Marion + Diaw with Diaw being what Minnesota would actually want in the trade. If they are going to get rid of Garnett and rebuild, I can't see them taking Marion's salary without getting something REALLY valuable out of it.

I totally agree Chris. Minnesota is going to want a bright young star to go along with Marion.
 

asudevil83

Registered User
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Posts
2,061
Reaction score
1
NastyOne said:
If they move KG i don't think they want any big contracts at all.

Minnesota would want to rebuild, and you can't do that by moving KG for a max player.

Suns and Wolves would have to get a third team with caproom involved where that third team would send young good players to minny and we would send them Marion in return.

Only teams that come to mind are Chicago and Toronto.

in all honesty i would rather just cut Minny out of the deal then. if a team like Chicago or Toronto would be willing to part with young cheap players and a pick for Marion and send those young players to Minny, well i'd like to have them instead. we would be stockpiling more young talent to go with our young core.
 

boisesuns

Standing Tall And Traded
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Posts
4,092
Reaction score
359
Location
Boise, ID
If it's Marion and Diaw thats a BIG NO. But KG would help this team in so many ways, that if you can get him for marion, and barbs I think it's worth it. We need half court D and size to put us over the top.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
MaoTosiFanClub said:
Garnett means Diaw or Amare. Fantasy combinations of Marion and scrubs is purely a pipe dream.

No offense, but I find it funny when it's assumed other teams now value Diaw more than Marion. Diaw has a lot of value to the Suns as a 6-8 center. No other team in the league wants a 6-8 center. No other team even wants a 6-8 power forward, and Diaw has yet to show any real value playing 1, 2, or 3.

Trust me when I say any team not being run by a crack-pipe smoking GM will want Marion -- salary and all -- more than Diaw. In fact, Marion might have more value to some other team than what he produces per dollar as a Sun. In some cases, a lot more. If the Heat had anything to offer the Suns in return, think they'd give up pretty much anything short of Dwayne Wade to get an athlete like Marion in their system?

I remain in the camp that Marion costs too much on this specific team, but in no way should he be traded for the sake of cutting costs. The only reasonable Marion trade is one that makes us better right now, and I will be satisfied if that trade never comes along.

I also think any trade that allows the Suns to keep Nash and Stoudemire while acquiring KG is totally worth it.
 
OP
OP
H

hsandhu

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
2,485
Reaction score
197
Yeah any inclusion of Diaw ends talks.
You also have to look at what other teams can offer. Can anyone offer a better deal than the suns? Their combination of talent (maybe talent like marion that minny doesnt want but others do which can be parlayed to minny), and the high pick next year put them in a good spot.

Minnesota needs to learn from orlando, and not wait to get an "all-star" name like steve francis, they need to get the greatest combination of picks/young (23-24 year old) talent that they can get. They aren't going anywhere for 5 years no matter what they do, so get a lot of 20-24 year olds and see if they can gel into something decent. After a few years keep the ones who have broken out as stars.

If minnesota does pull the trigger, i believe the suns can put the package together, the question is will they be willing to take the financial hit in 07/08 08/09?
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
17,100
Reaction score
7,858
asudevil83 said:
in all honesty i would rather just cut Minny out of the deal then. if a team like Chicago or Toronto would be willing to part with young cheap players and a pick for Marion and send those young players to Minny, well i'd like to have them instead. we would be stockpiling more young talent to go with our young core.

Good idea. If we have to trade Marion let's get some cap relief and future prospects. Marion to Chicago for the #2 and solid young talent? I'll leave the details to someone with cap knowledge. I think Chicago is under the cap so they could swallow Marion's contract. With the #2 we could take Bargnani. A combo involving a couple of the following (Deng, Duhon, Hinrich, or Nocioni) would be ideal.
 

NastyOne

Suns 4 Life...Probably...Maybe
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
520
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte
hsandhu said:
If minnesota does pull the trigger, i believe the suns can put the package together, the question is will they be willing to take the financial hit in 07/08 08/09?

Sarver better, Cause Amare/Nash/Garnett/Diaw isnt just a championship squad, thats a potential dynasty on his hands.

A team like that can win multiple titles and might dominate for the next 3-5 years.
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
17,100
Reaction score
7,858
Minnesota needs to learn from orlando, and not wait to get an "all-star" name like steve francis, they need to get the greatest combination of picks/young (23-24 year old) talent that they can get. They aren't going anywhere for 5 years no matter what they do, so get a lot of 20-24 year olds and see if they can gel into something decent. After a few years keep the ones who have broken out as stars.

Great minds think alike. I was just about to post something similar regarding the McGrady deal.
 

NastyOne

Suns 4 Life...Probably...Maybe
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
520
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte
Folster said:
Good idea. If we have to trade Marion let's get some cap relief and future prospects. Marion to Chicago for the #2 and solid young talent? I'll leave the details to someone with cap knowledge. I think Chicago is under the cap so they could swallow Marion's contract. With the #2 we could take Bargnani. A combo involving a couple of the following (Deng, Duhon, Hinrich, or Nocioni) would be ideal.

We're so close to our first title, now isnt the time to be talking about moving allstars for cap relief and young unproven players.

We might not ever be this close to a title again, can't blow it just to save some cash.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,886
Reaction score
7,102
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Gaddabout said:
No offense, but I find it funny when it's assumed other teams now value Diaw more than Marion. Diaw has a lot of value to the Suns as a 6-8 center. No other team in the league wants a 6-8 center. No other team even wants a 6-8 power forward, and Diaw has yet to show any real value playing 1, 2, or 3.
I never said that Diaw's a better player than Marion. I said Diaw on his rookie contract is more valuable than Marion at a max contract.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
MaoTosiFanClub said:
I never said that Diaw's a better player than Marion. I said Diaw on his rookie contract is more valuable than Marion at a max contract.
I still respectfully disagree, at least in terms of how other GMs will look at it. Diaw has one year left on his rookie contract, and will be due a substantial upgrade. Will his new contract be more affordable than Marion's? In terms of actual dollars, of course, but perhaps not in production. The fact that Diaw at present is a one-year wonder playing in a position where, defensively, he is a major liability, and in an offense nobody else in the league runs, substantially impacts Diaw's trade value to the negative. Marion, on the other hand, is a known quantity who has shown he can produce in pretty much any environment.

Whatever team that might acquire Marion will be relatively assured they will get ~ 20/10 most nights without running a play for him, in addition to getting one of the top 5 athletes in the league. They would have very little idea what they're getting in Diaw, with relative assurance they won't have a clue how to maximize his best features without substantially altering what they do on offense.
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
17,100
Reaction score
7,858
NastyOne said:
We're so close to our first title, now isnt the time to be talking about moving allstars for cap relief and young unproven players.

We might not ever be this close to a title again, can't blow it just to save some cash.

I agree thats why I said, "if we have to trade Marion." I want to give this team a chance, but I realize the financial limitations and Sarver's reluctance to pay the luxury tax might make a trade a reality.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
Folster said:
I agree thats why I said, "if we have to trade Marion." I want to give this team a chance, but I realize the financial limitations and Sarver's reluctance to pay the luxury tax might make a trade a reality.

But it's pretty clear a money decision won't come this summer. The Suns don't have to clear cap space until next year.
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
17,100
Reaction score
7,858
Gaddabout said:
But it's pretty clear a money decision won't come this summer. The Suns don't have to clear cap space until next year.

True, but that's not taking into account TT and our draft picks.
 

Treesquid PhD

Pardon my Engrish
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
4,844
Reaction score
105
Location
Gilbert
Gaddabout said:
I still respectfully disagree, at least in terms of how other GMs will look at it. Diaw has one year left on his rookie contract, and will be due a substantial upgrade. Will his new contract be more affordable than Marion's? In terms of actual dollars, of course, but perhaps not in production. The fact that Diaw at present is a one-year wonder playing in a position where, defensively, he is a major liability, and in an offense nobody else in the league runs, substantially impacts Diaw's trade value to the negative. Marion, on the other hand, is a known quantity who has shown he can produce in pretty much any environment.

Whatever team that might acquire Marion will be relatively assured they will get ~ 20/10 most nights without running a play for him, in addition to getting one of the top 5 athletes in the league. They would have very little idea what they're getting in Diaw, with relative assurance they won't have a clue how to maximize his best features without substantially altering what they do on offense.
And that's one of the differnce between fans and real NBA GM's. Fans tend to value players relative to their expectations of that player. Diaw is a great young talent but surely the fans overvalue him (at least here) based on what they expected and what the result was. I look at the hate from some fans on Amare and it's totally evident, the expectations are so large he can't win and they want him gone yet some loser like Pat Burke scores a lucky bucket in garbage time and every mental giant wants him to get significant PT in the WCF.

Marion surely has much more real leaugue value than Diaw..Two-three years years from now this might be different but it isn't now.
 

MastersofCombat

Basketball Junkie
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Posts
720
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
The problem about moving Garnett is he is called the BIG TICKET means it would take an Amare for Garnett to be moved and we wouldnt do it.
 

NastyOne

Suns 4 Life...Probably...Maybe
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
520
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte
MastersofCombat said:
The problem about moving Garnett is he is called the BIG TICKET means it would take an Amare for Garnett to be moved and we wouldnt do it.

No it wouldnt, we have other trade pieces that we can move for KG.

A healthy Amare has more trade value than KG because of his age and dominance when healthy.
 
Top